Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This means actually "I CAN go to the store" in terms of being in a position to do so -- physically up to it, getting in the time, the money, transport etc"
うーん・・・
僕はお店に行かれます。?
母は僕にお店に行かれます。?
That means "I'm going to go dive," if there's no typos.Did I translate this right? (from a manga)
chotto moguttekuru ne?
Won't you come diving for a little bit?
Also I did read the "Typing in Japanese" topic but couldn't get it to work, so please excuse the romaji
P.S. I'm new here, so Kon'ichiwa and all that stuff
mogutte = I will divedoumo arigatou gozaimasu![]()
Hi Folks,
I've got this picture, and would really like to know what's written there. I'm guessing that it's something like "this points to an idiot", but since google translate doesn't do OCR yet, I'm not sure.
Take it to a site that does Japanese vulgarities along with porn phrases...Here's the image, although I myself don't know what it means
![]()
Take it to a site that does Japanese vulgarities along with porn phrases...![]()
It's not hard core or anything. But the large print says something about a recent obsession with well endowed women, so someone here may be offended. It should probably be taken down. Although there could be a more indirect meaning I'm not getting either....hmmm... thanks Jericho, and sorry for the vulgarities.
it was taken from bokeru-com, which as far as I can see is no porn site (at least no nudity, can judge its textual content).
are the vulgarities addressed to whoever the arrow is pointing too?
たき様が我儘をおっしゃられたのはあれが初めてだったんだ。
Is this basically: "It was the first time anyone spoke to Taki-sama's willfullness", i.e. "It was the first time anyone talked back to Taki-sama [but he needed it]"?
The first half of the sentence is in the indirect passive voice, right? And Taki-sama is the subject but his behavior is the direct object? And then the whole first half is nominalized by のは? Is that all correct?
Hmm, actually, there's no actor in there, so the actor could be an abstract person or it could be the other character they're discussing- i.e. "anyone talked back" or "he talked back". Is that right?
おっしゃられる is so-called 二重敬語[nijuu-keigo; double honorific.] This expression is considered grammatically incorrect at least in modern Japanese. (It was used basically for Imperial families/high-class nobles in archaic Japanese.)Hi everyone!
So the grammar in this sentence is pretty hard for me, and I was hoping someone could check it for me. It's from a manga.
たき様が我儘をおっしゃられたのはあれが初めてだったんだ。
Is this basically: "It was the first time anyone spoke to Taki-sama's willfullness", i.e. "It was the first time anyone talked back to Taki-sama [but he needed it]"?
The first half of the sentence is in the indirect passive voice, right? And Taki-sama is the subject but his behavior is the direct object? And then the whole first half is nominalized by のは? Is that all correct?
Hmm, actually, there's no actor in there, so the actor could be an abstract person or it could be the other character they're discussing- i.e. "anyone talked back" or "he talked back". Is that right?
Thanks!
おっしゃられる is so-called 二重敬語[nijuu-keigo; double honorific.] This expression is considered grammatically incorrect at least in modern Japanese.
Thank you both! The context made it obvious it wasn't a common speech pattern (and it's set more or less in WWII, so it being archaic isn't surprising either). I'm happy that I figured out correctly that Taki is the one who was being selfish/willful- I think that was my primary question. I thought that his subordinates were extremely politely criticizing him behind his back- which seems correct from what you write here.As you know, おっしゃる is a polite form of 言う. Now, おっしゃられる goes another step higher on the politeness ladder. It is not a passive form. It is Taki who is being selfish/willful. It is not a speech often heard in casual conversations.
I simply need the romanji spelling for this kanji because it's not showing up on any of the dictionaries I own.
窶敘。窶愿サ
(P.S. Hey long time no see old forum.)
...But if it's not really passive, does that mean Taki was also the one doing the action of the verb (Taki spoke selfishly)? Or did someone else do the action like in a normal passive sentence (Taki was selfish and he was spoken to)?
It's not showing up on your dictionaries because it is a made-up word.
It is read BAKU-NYUU, and it means "a set of ginormous breasts".
(Wow that was fast) so basically it was Japanese Slang of some sort?
(P.S. Thanks for the quick response)
It was Taki who "said" (言った/おっしゃった/おっしゃられた) something that was unreasonable and selfish (わがまま).
Uh, the term "archaic" I mentioned above refers to almost "ancient," Heian Era, Nara Era , the era when the expression such like あれが初めてだったんだ never existed.The context made it obvious it wasn't a common speech pattern (and it's set more or less in WWII, so it being archaic isn't surprising either).