ツ催ー窶愿コ窶堙娯?嗄窶喩窶嗚ニ停?ーニ淡ニ棚窶堙娯?ーp窶ーテッヒ彙窶敕披?枠窶堙 窶堋ス窶堙懌?堋ス窶堙慊、"be + (窶ーテ溪?ケナス窶「ツェナスナ?" 窶堙 "get + (窶ーテ溪?ケナス窶「ツェナスナ?" 窶堙戸?。窶堋「窶堙俄?堙や?堋「窶堙?静?窶督セ窶堋オ窶堙??堋「窶堙懌?堋オ窶堋スツ。窶堋サ窶堙ェ窶堙俄?堙ヲ窶堙ゥ窶堙?、"be + (窶ーテ溪?ケナス窶「ツェナスナ?" 窶堙坂?儕窶堙嫁ス窶毒ステ?窶堙ー窶彖窶堋ヲ窶堙ゥ窶堙娯?堙俄?佚寂?堋オ窶堙?、"get + (窶ーテ溪?ケナス窶「ツェナスナ?" 窶堙哉辰ニ停?愴稚ニ辿ツーニ筑ニ停?ケ窶堙?、窶ーツス窶堋ゥ窶堙可「窶堙「窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥツ」窶堙??堋「窶堋、ナ?'窶堋カ窶堋ェ窶堋?窶堙ゥ窶堙??堙娯?堋ア窶堙??堙??堋キツ。
In the yesterday lesson of NHK radio english program, there happened to be a explanation of the differece between "be + (past participle)" and "get + (past participle)". According to that, "get+" is rather informal and has a feeling of unexpectedly being forced by something, whereas "be+" conveys facts simply.
窶堋ア窶堙ェ窶堙坂?ーpナ津ェ窶堙 "窶「テ??堙個湘ェツ坂?。" 窶堙俄?堙?窶懌?凪?堙??堙坂?堙懌?堙ゥ窶堙娯?堙??堋オ窶堙・窶堋、窶堋ゥツ?
Does this go for the "rice case" in English ?