- 15 Oct 2004
- 8
- 0
from the web said:Comparison with Japanese
I didn't find Japanese too difficult while studying it at Defense Language Institute, but when I arrived in Japan, I found that I had a lot of trouble communicating. This was very different from my experience with Mandarin. When I arrived in Taiwan, I could pretty much discuss any topic. On the other hand, I spent a total of 7.5 years in Japan, much of it associating with people who spoke little or no English, yet I never felt confident in the language. It's not so much the syntax--the conjugation of verbs and adjectives is quite regular--but the way the language is used. In many respects, it seems to be as much a problem of culture as of language per se.
Japanese syntax, as usually taught in schools, covers about 25 percent of the syntax. Even Defense Language Institute probably wasn't able to cover more than about 60 percent. It's not that it's so difficult--there's just so much of it. Compared with conversational Mandarin, there seem to be many more common ways of expressing any particular idea. The Japanese seem to be more fond of synonyms, too, leading to the need for more vocabulary items. Japanese culture adds to the burden. The Japanese don't like to just come right out and make blunt statements. They talk around the subject. By comparison, Chinese speakers and English speakers are very much alike. They tend to be direct and precise. Although this is a matter of culture, it has a big impact on the ease or difficulty of learning the language of a particular culture.
So, I'd say that what made Japanese difficult for me (and for all of my fellow Defense Language Institute graduates) is that there seems to be so much of it, and that it's spoken by people who are living in the Japanese culture.
Many of my friends had similar experiences, including one who graduated from the Japanese course with a 98 average--the highest on record. He was quite angry when he arrived in Japan and found that he couldn't get around in the language as he had been able to do with Mandarin in Taiwan.
Sousuke-Sagara said:Well, while the US is expending its resources to primarily train linguists in Arabic, Chinese, and Korean, there still is a need for Japanese linguists. There are tens of thousands of American servicemen stationed on bases in Japan right now. These bases aren't entirely isolated from the surrounding areas, and interactions between the bases and local municipalities are regular.
Plus, many of the American soldiers who are sent to Japan are not the top-shelf guys. Most of the soldiers who demonstrate excellence and get first choice of units wind up on bases in Hawaii or in the continental US. Because many servicemen sent to Japan are not of exceptionally high caliber, they have a propensity to misbehave (usually only minor stuff, but this type of behavior creates disturbances nonetheless). From what I've gathered from a discussion with a former Japanese linguist in the Navy, they spend a considerable portion of their time helping to sort out these problems.
So, as long there are US bases in Japan and the US Overseas Screening process remains lax, there will still be a considerable demand for Japanese linguists in the military. Odds are that if one demonstrates proficiency in the language by scoring well on his DLPT and qualifies for a job in intelligence via the ASVAB, one can certainly become a Japanese linguist.
Sousuke-Sagara said:Also, I should note that my assertion about the quality of American soldiers in Japan is based on what other former and current servicemen have told me; I lack concrete empirical data to support my statement. However, determining which soldiers get stationed where isn't random. If you complete training for your MOS in the top tier of your class, you have more of a say in deciding where you get stationed than the dregs. And from what I've been told, the most skilled soldiers generally do not opt to spend their years in Japan.
Sousuke-Sagara said:Ah, some excellent advice! I'm glad I can get the low-down from an actual marine, the guys I've been talking to have all been air force and navy. I figured all the branches did things the same way (I thought wrong I guess). I'm still going to be a marine anyway (you just can't beat the Marine Corps College Fund), but I appreciate your clearing this matter up for me! Thanks a ton for your help, I really appreciate it!