Is Romanji point less to the japanese?
if not, how usefull is it?
I ask these questions because I am translating a game and since my computer shows "???" when inputting japanese I was thinking about putting it in Romanji.
If you are still a beginner with Japanese yourself, why not just use English, as it will appeal to the widest audience, and you'll have a better chance of the audience understanding what you write.
My vote would be for no. I can see where the Japanese folks are coming from with their not wanting to read lots of rōmaji. I've been studying for a litter while now and rōmaji is already difficult and awkward to read. It's just so much easier to read real Japanese.
If you're doing this for Japanese practice (I didn't notice whether or not you said you were fluent), I'd say do it on a personal level. But if you can't release the game in any non-rōmaji form, then I say don't bother. Even if there are some folks interested in learning Japanese, rōmaji is a terrible way to get your bearings in Japanese. (A bit at the very beginning, I think, is fine. But a whole game of it would likely be detrimental to their education because that's not quite Japanese.)
Well, I'm insane, so when I first started romanizing Japanese, I wanted to properly emulate katakana's extended vowels and so I copied the characters from Windows's Character Map and saved them to a text file. (I just don't like how "romaji" looks, really.) I don't think that Windows can do this sort of thing easily.
Here are the vowels I got:
ascii A's [ À Á Â Ã Ä Å à á â ã ä å ]
ascii E's [ È É Ê Ë è é ê ë ]
ascii I's [ Ì Í Î Ï ì í î ï ]
ascii O's [ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö ó ô ò õ ö ]
ascii U's [ Ù Ú Û Ü ù ú û ü ]
vowels with macrons [ Ā ā Ē ē Ī ī Ō ō Ū ū ]
Most accents I would want aren't a problem and they're even easier if I have my computer set up for English-International input, but macrons aren't part of ascii and so they're hard to find. Thanks for supplying them.