The IMF said Japan should avoid reducing the consumption tax as it would "erode fiscal space and add to fiscal risks." Rather, the administration's proposed temporary suspension of the food levy would help contain fiscal costs, Anand said, adding the IMF can better assess the effect on Japan's finances once there is more clarity on how the move will be funded. "Near-term fiscal policy should refrain from further loosening," the IMF said in the statement, calling for a credible medium-term fiscal framework with a "clearly defined fiscal anchor."
Is it any of the IMF's business?
The IMF's austerity policies have had a catastrophic effect on many African countries, leading to huge cuts in education and welfare spending, and they have a clear dogma: fiscal discipline above everything else, regardless of a country's circumstances.Given the Japanese government's tendency to react to overseas criticism, this should serve as a reminder that suspending the food tax is not such a good idea. Any financial windfall for consumers will soon be eaten up by inflation, while public debt will continue to skyrocket.
Takaichi is probably well aware of that. Her reaction to expected criticism: shorten the budget deliberations in the Diet.
Japan PM Takaichi set to speed up submission of consumption tax bills to Diet
She could also fake an injury to her other hand and skip deliberations altogether.
Here's what ChatGPT said on the role of the IMF:
The International Monetary Fund was created to monitor global economic stability. Under its Articles of Agreement (Article IV), it conducts regular consultations with member countries, including Japan, and issues policy assessments. These often cover fiscal policy, taxation, debt sustainability and monetary conditions.
Japan is a member state and one of the IMF's largest shareholders. That means the Fund is formally mandated to review Japan's economic policies and publish recommendations. When the IMF comments on suspending a food tax, it is doing so within its surveillance role, particularly given Japan's very high public debt and the global spillover risks of major fiscal shifts.
However, the IMF cannot compel Japan to change policy. Its role is advisory. Governments may accept, modify or ignore its recommendations.
Two-thirds of Japanese firms are concerned about the government's fiscal discipline, a Reuters survey showed on Thursday, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi plans a temporary suspension of sales tax on food and steps up investment to spur growth.
Previous tax cuts overseas may offer some lessons for Japan, according to experts. A 14 percentage point cut in value-added tax for hairdressing services in Finland had only a limited impact between 2007 and 2011, while the suspension of Argentina's 21 percent tax on food products led to an average price drop of 10 percent. In Portugal, however, the suspension in 2023 of 6 percent tax on some food products was directly reflected in retail prices, according to the experts. Makoto Hasegawa, an associate professor of finance at Kyoto University, said prices in Portugal were already deflationary at the stage of production and businesses were facing pressure from consumer groups and the media to lower prices. It remains unclear whether Japan will also see similar results if the tax suspension is implemented, according to Hasegawa.
Price hikes for food and beverage items in March will total 684 products, down 70%from a year earlier, a sign that food prices are rising more slowly though the weak yen could still push them up, a research institute said Friday.
According to the officials, hearings held by the council with major system developers revealed that a year of overhauls would be needed to reduce the consumption tax rate on food from the current 8 percent to zero. But a cut to a non-zero rate, like 1 percent, could be implemented in about six months, they said. The Takaichi administration had previously emphasized its commitment to the zero-tax goal, wary of criticism for breaking a campaign promise. However, support for the 1 percent proposal grew within the government and ruling coalition after the logistics hurdle was pointed out.
The proposal to lower Japan's food consumption tax has highlighted several problems facing Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and her administration. One major issue is technical. Retailers and system companies say it could take around a year to update cash registers, payment systems, and accounting software to handle a full 0% tax rate on food. Because of that, the government is now leaning towards a temporary 1% rate instead, which would be easier to introduce quickly.
There are also concerns over cost. Cutting the food tax would reduce government revenue by trillions of yen at a time when Japan already faces heavy public debt and pressure over its finances.
Politically, the move is awkward for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, which had promised during the election campaign to push for a zero-per-cent food tax. Moving to 1% instead risks criticism that the government is backing away from a key pledge.
Officials are also worried about what happens later. Even if the reduced tax only lasts two years, raising it back to 8% afterwards could prove politically difficult once consumers become used to lower prices.
When asked to choose one or more reasons for raising prices, 92.5 percent of companies cited higher raw materials costs, 71.9 percent selected logistics expenses and 69.8 percent pointed to packaging and other materials. These factors are all susceptible to higher crude oil prices, indicating that companies are reflecting increased costs stemming from the Middle East conflict in product prices. By category, processed foods, such as frozen foods, accounted for the largest number of planned price hikes at 5,780 items. They were followed by seasonings at 3,467 items and alcoholic beverages and soft drinks at 2,913 items. Calbee Inc. will begin raising prices in stages for products such as potato chips on deliveries from Oct. 1, with retail prices expected to rise by around 3-15 percent. NH Foods Ltd., which changed its name from Nippon Meat Packers Inc. in 2014, will raise prices for its flagship Schau Essen sausages, while Kirin Beverage Co. is increasing prices for Nama Cha green tea and Gogo no Kocha black tea drinks.
chocolate bars at 7-11 now are at 217 yen. Forget that price and the bars are wafer thin too.Assuming that prices will fall if consumption tax is removed is fatally flawed, as companies charge what they think the market will bear. There was certainly no reduction in the prices of imports when the yen rose to almost twice its current level 15 years ago (apart from the occasional half-hearted 円高還元感謝セール in Kaldi).
Let's take chocolate in Japan as an example, the price of which has roughly doubled as a result of a price spike in the bean.
Except, as you can see from the graph below, the price spike is over (despite the very recent news stories about how manufacturers are being forced to pass on higher cocoa prices to consumers through more expensive Valentine's chocolates). Prices are back at their long-term levels, but I would be very surprised if manufacturers lower their prices now that people have got used to more expensive chocolate.
The fact that prices of different companies' products are often identical (beer in convenience stores) suggests that manufacturers collude, and it is highly likely they will agree to maintain current prices despite the reduction in tax. It may even hurt consumers in the long term, as companies 'regretfully' have to increase prices by 8% when sales tax is reimposed when the 2-year exemption ends.
View attachment 135411
The govt should leave the consumption tax alone, and do it solely by handouts/vouchers.low- and medium-income households via cash handouts
Woo hoo! Now you can splurge on that wagyu.It looks like the drop in consumption tax is happening after all. The expected rate is going to be 1% for two years, starting in April 2027, with the equivalent of the remaining 1% given to low- and medium-income households via cash handouts.
PM intends to cut consumption tax on food to 1% from April 2027
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Thursday expressed her intention to seek a cut in the consumption tax rate on food and beverages to 1 percent from the current 8 percent for two years starting next April, according to an official of her party, as households continue to struggle with…japantoday.com
Although parliament was in recess, many lawmakers traveled from their home districts to Tokyo that morning, expressing their backing for Takaichi. The process demonstrated the overwhelming influence that Takaichi exercises over the party. But now she will have to raise the tax back to 8% in two years. "If approval ratings cannot be maintained, raising the tax later on will be difficult," said a LDP member who has served as party secretary-general.
The tax cut plan was approved at the LDP's decision-making General Council earlier on Wednesday, although some veteran lawmakers such as former Foreign Minister Taro Kono and former Defense Minister Gen Nakatani had expressed their opposition.