This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Economy Japan to cut consumption tax on food to 1% from April 2027

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,091
Reaction score
18,981
The IMF is calling on Japan to keep raising interest rates and to avoid further fiscal loosening, arguing that a cut to the consumption tax would leave the government with less room to respond in a downturn.

The recommendation comes just after PM Takaichi's election win, which has stirred speculation in financial markets about how firmly she will back the central bank's further moves. She has already promised a 2-year suspension of the 8% food consumption tax. In a preliminary policy paper issued Wednesday, the IMF pointed to the Bank of Japan's independence as a factor anchoring inflation expectations. The institution said the bank is rolling back monetary stimulus. It indicated that step-by-step rate increases should continue until the policy rate reaches a neutral setting, and it warned against political pressure on monetary decisions.


 
Is it any of the IMF's business?

Given the Japanese government's tendency to react to overseas criticism, this should serve as a reminder that suspending the food tax is not such a good idea. Any financial windfall for consumers will soon be eaten up by inflation, while public debt will continue to skyrocket.

Takaichi is probably well aware of that. Her reaction to expected criticism: shorten the budget deliberations in the Diet.

Japan PM Takaichi set to speed up submission of consumption tax bills to Diet

She could also fake an injury to her other hand and skip deliberations altogether.

Here's what ChatGPT said on the role of the IMF:

The International Monetary Fund was created to monitor global economic stability. Under its Articles of Agreement (Article IV), it conducts regular consultations with member countries, including Japan, and issues policy assessments. These often cover fiscal policy, taxation, debt sustainability and monetary conditions.

Japan is a member state and one of the IMF's largest shareholders. That means the Fund is formally mandated to review Japan's economic policies and publish recommendations. When the IMF comments on suspending a food tax, it is doing so within its surveillance role, particularly given Japan's very high public debt and the global spillover risks of major fiscal shifts.

However, the IMF cannot compel Japan to change policy. Its role is advisory. Governments may accept, modify or ignore its recommendations.
 
The IMF's austerity policies have had a catastrophic effect on many African countries, leading to huge cuts in education and welfare spending, and they have a clear dogma: fiscal discipline above everything else, regardless of a country's circumstances.


I don't think the organisation has any credibility, which is why I made the comment.
 
I don't deny that the IMF's role has been detrimental to many economies, but I believe they are right to suggest further austerity for the Japanese government. I'm all for supporting those in need, but a blanket tax cut on consumables for two years is a political, not a fiscal measure. The IMF actually suggested targeted, time-limited support for lower-income households (cash transfers, benefit top-ups, food vouchers, etc.).

And it's not just the IMF that's expressed concerns:

Two-thirds of Japanese firms are concerned about the government's fiscal discipline, a Reuters survey showed on Thursday, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi plans a temporary suspension of sales tax on food and steps up investment to spur growth.

 
On the subject of targeted support, a German friend of mine volunteers at a food bank in Hachioji every week. I hadn't even realised there were food banks in Tokyo! He says they run out of stock in less than an hour, and most of the people coming in are retirees relying on it. Many feel ashamed to be there. Provisions are provided by the municipality and local supermarkets.
 
Yeah, don't expect too much:

PM Takaichi plans to suspend Japan's consumption tax on food to ease inflationary pressure, though some economists question whether the move would lower consumer prices. Analysts point to overseas examples suggesting tax cuts do not always translate into lower retail prices. Some businesses that have absorbed higher import costs linked to the weak yen may instead use the suspension to raise prices they had previously held back. After its landslide victory in the 8 February general election, the ruling coalition is seeking to remove the current 8% tax on food for two years.

Cross-party discussions began on Friday to work out the details of the proposal. Takaichi aims to submit legislation as early as this autumn to implement the measure. Japan raised the overall consumption tax to 10% in 2019 while keeping food at a reduced 8% rate. A government survey that year found that prices increased for 31 of 40 items surveyed, including goods subject to the lower rate.



In related news, Kyodo won the contest for Weirdest Headline (below reprinted by Mainichi).

No. of price hikes among food items in Japan to fall 70% in March to 684 items


So the prices of only 684 products will increase in March. Pop the champagne bottles.

Price hikes for food and beverage items in March will total 684 products, down 70%from a year earlier, a sign that food prices are rising more slowly though the weak yen could still push them up, a research institute said Friday.

 
Assuming that prices will fall if consumption tax is removed is fatally flawed, as companies charge what they think the market will bear. There was certainly no reduction in the prices of imports when the yen rose to almost twice its current level 15 years ago (apart from the occasional half-hearted 円高還元感謝セール in Kaldi).

Let's take chocolate in Japan as an example, the price of which has roughly doubled as a result of a price spike in the bean.

Except, as you can see from the graph below, the price spike is over (despite the very recent news stories about how manufacturers are being forced to pass on higher cocoa prices to consumers through more expensive Valentine's chocolates). Prices are back at their long-term levels, but I would be very surprised if manufacturers lower their prices now that people have got used to more expensive chocolate.

The fact that prices of different companies' products are often identical (beer in convenience stores) suggests that manufacturers collude, and it is highly likely they will agree to maintain current prices despite the reduction in tax. It may even hurt consumers in the long term, as companies 'regretfully' have to increase prices by 8% when sales tax is reimposed when the 2-year exemption ends.

 
Don't they mean the 税込み price? That should go down.
 
The Japanese government aims to cut the consumption tax on groceries to 1% for two years from next April, officials said on 2 June, stepping back from an earlier promise to make food entirely tax-free. The LDP had pledged during the February Lower House election campaign to expedite consideration of a zero-per-cent tax on food. PM Takaichi had also expressed hopes of implementing such a policy during fiscal 2026.

That plan is now being shelved because retailers and businesses would need about a year to update cash registers and payment systems to handle the change. The government had decided to prioritise speed instead. A reduced 1% rate was seen as easier to implement within the available timeframe.



I asked AI why this system update is so terribly complicated:

Several things have to be updated at once:
  • cash registers and POS systems
  • accounting software
  • barcode databases and product tax classifications
  • receipt formats compliant with the invoice system (インボイス制度)
  • payment terminals linked to credit cards and e-money
  • back-office tax reporting systems
A temporary 0% rate is especially awkward because retailers would suddenly have three categories instead of the current two:
  • standard 10%
  • reduced 8% food tax
  • temporary 0% food tax
Many older systems used by small shops, supermarkets, restaurants, and franchise chains in Japan are not centrally managed and still rely on customised software or hardware that has to be manually reconfigured.
 
The price of populism. This is quickly turning into a nightmare for Takaichi.


 
Price rises for food and drink products in Japan are on course to reach 20,000 items this year, for the second year in a row, largely due to higher material costs linked to the Middle East crisis. The weaker yen is adding more pressure. Teikoku Databank said on 30 June that companies were expected to keep passing higher costs on to consumers through product prices.

Its survey of 195 major manufacturers found that price increases had either been introduced or scheduled for 14,902 products between January and November. By month, price hikes are planned for 2,566 items in July, 1,898 in August and 3,029 in September.


 
chocolate bars at 7-11 now are at 217 yen. Forget that price and the bars are wafer thin too.
 
It seems to be dawning on bureaucrats that Takaichi's consumption tax cuts are economic nonsense.

A basic question is beginning to emerge as a bipartisan national conference on social security prepares an interim report: Is PM Takaichi's flagship consumption tax cut actually needed?

The government and ruling parties plan to introduce the tax cut in April 2027 as a temporary measure until a refundable tax credit is in place. Takaichi has described the tax credit as the "core of reform", with full implementation targeted for fiscal 2029 through a simplified system that does not offset tax liabilities. Yet a scheme that is expected to be almost identical is now likely to begin as early as autumn 2027, raising fresh questions about whether the interim tax cut serves any real purpose.

 
It looks like the drop in consumption tax is happening after all. The expected rate is going to be 1% for two years, starting in April 2027, with the equivalent of the remaining 1% given to low- and medium-income households via cash handouts.

 
low- and medium-income households via cash handouts
The govt should leave the consumption tax alone, and do it solely by handouts/vouchers.

Instead of guaranteeing a two-year loss of tax revenue, do one cycle of handouts and revisit those the following year.

(And lean on the BOJ to raise interest rates.)
 
Woo hoo! Now you can splurge on that wagyu.
 
The funding is still unclear, but opposition within the LDP ranks has largely been silenced. Takaichi seems intent on keeping her election promise, whatever the cost:

PM Takaichi's cabinet has approved a cut to Japan's consumption tax on food, overcoming resistance from more cautious lawmakers within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party by arguing that the measure was a key campaign pledge in the general election, which delivered the party a historic victory.

The move marks a break with the LDP's long-standing emphasis on securing stable funding for Japan's growing social security costs. Takaichi's success in pushing the policy through underscored her authority within the party, but some observers believe the forceful approach could create tensions within the LDP in the future.


Paywall alert:

The tax cut plan was approved at the LDP's decision-making General Council earlier on Wednesday, although some veteran lawmakers such as former Foreign Minister Taro Kono and former Defense Minister Gen Nakatani had expressed their opposition.


 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…