centrajapan
先輩
- 16 Sep 2007
- 715
- 11
I'm glad the new Australian prime minister is against whaling. This will probably get some changes made.
Australia harvests four species of Kangaroo, all of which are harvested by licensed catchers, from the wild (a very sustainable method I'm sure you will agree) these kangaroos are used for either human food consumption or pet food. No food is left to rot. Australian gun license law allows a certain amount of animals to be hunted (pigs, deers, foxes, goats, rabbits and kangaroos) to name a few. These are hunted inside the law and have certain bag limits as with fishing in Australian waters, no endangered or venerable species is hunted.
Whales and dolphins are mammals, which makes them different from other fish like tuna and salmon. They're actually not fish.
Here in the US, kids are playing in the petting zoo with cows and lambs one morning and eating hamburgers for lunch. I guess there are no kangaroos or crocs in Australian zoos? The anti-whaling hysteria is a bit too much coming from a country where people shoot wild kangaroos for fun.
Whie he OKs millions of kangaroos to get slaughterd because of pest control. And dingos too which are critically endngered but still regarded as pests. This double standard, a lack of understanding to people who eat a certain type of meat will get him the label and rightfully so the ignorant simple racist.
The point is...Fake blood smeared on Japanese Consulate
ANTI-WHALING protesters have vandalised the Japanese Consulate in Melbourne with fake blood.
...
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22977156-5006785,00.html
Meanwhile, Victorian police were not investigating.
The point is...
I am lucky enough to live in a police state where the police arrests people no matter what political orientation you have.
Government experts have increased the numbers allowed to be shot by commercial hunters from over five-and-a-half million every year to seven-million.
Nearly 6 million kangaroos are slaughtered yearly, making the massacres the largest butchery of wild animals in the world. Almost six million Australians died in 1999... Now there's a bulletin that would make quite a stir on the nightly news. The Australians in question are kangaroos, not humans, however, so the true story of Australia's war on wildlife wouldn't likely make your local news.
Each night in remote areas of the Australian outback thousands of kangaroos graze peacefully, stand up on hearing an approaching vehicle, stare into a blinding spotlight, and are shot for their meat and skins.
The commercial kangaroo kill ツ'quota' for 2007 (the number permitted to be killed) is just over 3.6 million kangaroos. In the past several years the full quota of kangaroos have been killed in several States; just recently kangaroo shooters have taken to ツ'camping' on the doorstep of NSW wildlife authorities to secure their ツ'tag' allocation
Rose.
I get it you guys believe whales are the greatest animals on this planet and you are hell bent on shoving your religion down people's throats.
When people stop eating whles what animal is next on yur agenda?
Not really. I am not trying to impose my eating habits down people's throats like you do and other anti whaling racist fanatics.I think it's you trying to push your opinion on everyone else.
Kame -
You seem to be constantly missing the point as does Centrajapan.
I am speaking for myself, my own opinions, NOT the Australian governement.
Most Japanese (and I would assume other whaling peoples) would find it very hypocritical, to say the least, to argue that eating whales is bad because they are somehow superior to fishes or other marine creatures.
I'm against causing pain for any animal or human. I can accept a hunter killing an animal quickly more than I can accept how animals are kept in cages to be eaten or for their fur.
What is the quick way of killing whales? It seems that because of their size, killing them would take a lot of work, and therefore take time, drawing out their suffering.
I think this is an assumption that people are against whaling because of thinking of them as superior to other animals. This is a "whaling" subforum, so we're discussing whales, not other animals. I'm against causing pain for any animal or human.
Are you saying that you wouldn't be against hunting whales if they can be killed quickly enough to minimize their suffering?
Or would you have other excuses to argue against sustainable whaling even if whales can be killed humanely?
I am still at a loss as to why you had to mention the obvious fact that whales are mammals and fishes are not?