This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Islam the beacon of light in Japan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Master X
  • Start date Start date
Jesus is mentioned in the quran more than mohamed...now why would'nt I listen to the gospels which were written 100 years after Jesus's death and reserection..at the end of all the oral preachers (who followed Jesus) lives.....

and listen to mohamed in the quran which was written 800 years after Jesus...and is drenched with gnostic teachings?

???????????
 
jarvis said:
the quran is completly different, completely...it mixes majic, hebrew, christain, zorestrian, all together to fit mohameds agenda...
Sounds similar to the OT mixing Sumerian, Egyptian & other MidEast myths to fit a Jewish agenda.
 
jarvis said:
says the germen...

That was something of a cheap shot and rather low blow, was it not !

Also .... Bossel may be German, but his English spelling skills are certainly superior to your own, sir/madam ! (I don't know which ...... your anonymity is total !)

Cordially,

ニ淡ニ停?。ニ停?
 
jarvis said:
says the germen...
What an eloquent reply.
Sadly not eloquent enough to enlighten me, I can't see your point.
 
Religion has caused more problems than its fixed, and continues to be a cause of death and sadness for many
 
The only religion we need in Japan is Shinto.That's why we have the Yasakuni shrine.

Strange my post yesterday was removed I guess by a PC moderater.All I said was that we don't need religious CRACKPOTS in Japan.

We already have enough of our own
 
That would be me. Your comment towards muslims in general was less than complimentary... Let's try to post in a constructive manner without resorting to insults and name-calling at the drop of a hat. Thanks.
 
Iron Chef said:
That would be me. Your comment towards muslims in general was less than complimentary... Let's try to post in a constructive manner without resorting to insults and name-calling at the drop of a hat. Thanks.

Compliments have to be earned. I really can't find anything to compliment on
 
Syncretism, is anyone free from it ?

Originally Posted by jarvis:
the quran is completly different, completely...it mixes majic, hebrew, christain, zorestrian, all together to fit mohameds agenda...

Originally Posted by Bossel:
Sounds similar to the OT mixing Sumerian, Egyptian & other MidEast myths to fit a Jewish agenda.

Originally Posted by Luther:
Sounds similar to Catholicism mixing Judaism, Christianity, Mysteries of Adonis and Demeter, and the Celtic deities.

Originally Posted by Anon.:
Sounds similar to Protestantism mixing Catholicism, the Winter Solstice, May Queen, and Children of the Corn

Originally Posted by Anon2.:
Sounds similar to New Age mixing Evangelism, Hindu, Buddhism, and Pot
 
Rule of Thumb in talking about other religion:

"Insulting a religion you don't even know makes you are a complete idiot"
 
bossel said:
:? What about? Still can't see the point. (maybe because of my lack of humour)
Then you must get yourself to one of your laughter clubs and be told to laugh
 
lifutushi said:
Rule of Thumb in talking about other religion:

"Insulting a religion you don't even know makes you are a complete idiot"
In spirit I agree. If I may add, 'insulting' anyone or anything would be idiotic if one were serious. But taken with either a bit of humor, or a bit of respect, which presupposes at least some knowledge of what one is talking about, very few comments would turn out to be genuine insults. And to add one more comment, ignorance really makes any 'insult' meaningless although it may be a little difficult to prove that people shouldn't get insulted by it.

A preacher once said saying someone is ignorant is not an insult because it only means that person doesn't know. It's surprising to hear that coming from a Christian teacher when Christ is supposed to have said, 'Anyone who calls a brother a raga (Aramaic for 'fool' ?) deserves to be punished.' (paraphrase) If that preacher wasn't trying to be contradictory with the sayings, I would assume then that calling someone ignorant isn't really an insult at all.

Perhaps we can start asking, 'Did you mean to be insulting with a good understanding of what you were talking about ? Do you know enough to make a disparaging statement ? Why do you sound angry at so-and-so ?' I wonder if it would be too cumbersome to ask ? Or would saying so also offend ?
 
Last edited:
Japanese as muslims?

Hi, being an asian chinese. i don't think many japanese would be interested in becoming muslims. becoming christians would be more probable.

the main reason is that it is inconceivable for most non muslim asians to give up pork. And true muslims can't even eat in places where pork and alcohol are served. Most japanese love their food and alcohol, so it is unthinkable to claim that there are more and more japanese muslims.

Halah food is virtually impossible to find in japan and korea.

Most families would also object their members converting to a religion where they no longer can eat with their families and friends. Most asians esp those with cultures influenced by china love their food and food culture is an inseperable part of their family ties.

I believe this would be interesting for you to prove how japanese muslims live in japan.

In my country, non muslims convert mainly through marriage to a muslim lady and most just convert in name only.
 
"Right now as I speak there are more than 200,000 japanese muslims in the streets of Tokyo, thats still too small in a population of 126,000,000."

No offence but why go to a country if you dont like their religion, why is it too small? I would not go to an islamic contry and espect everyone in that country to change their religion, I would not complain there were too few christians I would I would already know that it was not a christian country I was going to (if that makes sence).

Yeah lol, shinto and budists. I cant really see how islam would apeal to japanese people, but then I cant see how any religion could apeal to people.

Lol turns out paganisum is the fastest growing religion in britan, how weird is that!
 
Islam is a religion of peace and justice, many people are stereotypical and look at the right wing extremists.

THAT'S INCREDIBLE!
 
Most religions preach peace and tolerance towards others. It is a pity that the lunatics come into it and then pervert it to their own ends. Unfortunately it has been done since the birth of religious belief and will continue until we have either got beyond such petty power struggles or we manage to wipe ourselves out.
 
Many good points made here. I would agree that religion, especially the 'living' religions--since we can really see, study, and rather understand their platforms--have done good for humankind as well as bad. It may actually the the animal that we are that is the root of it rather than the religions that we come up with.

Now, folks, and some of you well know, I may be able to talk about the databases for Judism and Christiantiy, but cannot for Islam, basically, so I will noe even try to talk about that here. Just loved reading the posting. (I sometimes feel I wish there were a tid-bit more of a tendency to be true to the known facts, rather than be swayed by emotions.)
 
Religion in japan is rarely held so fantically and with all seriousness as in most of the world, a japanese could call themselves muslim and you'd be hard pressed to notice this religious affiliation in their day to day life.

Religion in japan is primarily buddhism and shinto, and really only because the japanese hold a high regard for tradition so, though i dont doubt a few are muslim, the number you claim to be is somewhat.....hard to believe as stated before, and those who do claim to be most likely wont follow it in the more serious manner which being a proper muslim may require.

As for worrying about this negetive image of muslims, you need not worry, christians have done bad things to, but that doesnt make all christians as baddies, so it doesnt make all muslims bad just because a bunch of nutjobs who DONT follow the proper teachings of islam go about killing.
 

Let me get this straight. You are saying that Militants and their behaviors give bad meaning to the fath of Islam, but in the very next paragraph you are asking why is the prime minister is siding with america and their war on these militants? Are think you are confused on your views

Personaly I feel that the Islam faith and it's people need to step up to the plate and get rid if the militants and the fanatisism.
 

What's the difference between the religion and people who follow it. Are practitioners what makes a religion what it is ? (Catholic) Christianity 1000 years ago was not at all like it is now. Without believers, a religion becomes extinct. Whatever one believes that religion is man-made or divine, it is a fact that religious practices, rules and believes evolve with the society and people in which they exist.

My point is that you cannot blame followers of a religion without blaming the religion itself, as this religion would not exist or be alive without them.

Regarding Islam and terrorism (or jihad), I think it's too easy for other Muslims to dismiss these actions as deviant Islam or "not the true Islam". Aren't those terrorists taught about religion by other Muslims ? Do not they grow up in typically entirely Muslim environment and families ? So, how could one not blame their family, environment and religious education (at the mosque) for what they have become ? Isn't it the duty of their parents or educators to inculcate them the "true values of Islam" ? If they are misled or confused, then there are people responsible for that. I always say "if you can't take care of your children's education, don't make them in the first place, as you are responsible for what they become". Being a parent is one of the most difficult jobs in the world. The more children one has, and the hardest it becomes.
 

I am not sure if you remember, but after 9/11, there were celebrations in the streets of some Muslim countries. I think it is normal that people raised in such environment (e.g. where the US is seen as an enemy and a terrorist attack on US soil is seen as a "victory") with strong religious beliefs should become terrorists. It is also the responsibility of Islamist government (e.g. Iran, Saudi Arabia...) to teach the so-called 'true values of Islam" such as peace and non-violence. If they fail, then it is their responsability as leaders of their religious community. Who says 'carrying responsability' means 'accepting punishment'. I have no sympathy for those governments. Saudi Arabia is by far the worst (but the US won't "punish" them as they were bribed to the bone with black gold).
 
Good afternoon there Maciamo san !! Hope's all well with you today. I haven't come back along this way in a while, and it seems as though maybe our visitor hasn't either, but I enjoyed your last two posts. I couldn't quite tell whether you were using the quote in post #148 to support what you were pointing out, or whether you were making counter point. But, which ever, I had intended to make the same point in that earlier post of mine. The animal--the homo sapien--makes the religion, and although the religion, in one sense could be seen as a distinct entity, it is the aggregate of human nature. In otherwords, it's the people themselves. I think that was basically the very same point you were making there, right? Or did I somehow miss that?

It's just that I have come to understand that we are just as animal as the tiger in the zoo. The 'Abrahamic' faiths, for now, have tried too hard to put humans above that; and it's a fallicy. Religion is as much a result of the type of animal we are, as it is a creation of the animal we are. I agree with the conclusions you reached from that observation. I think I understood you correctly. Talk to you later !!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…