Sukotto said:I don't really like the term 'western'. For one thing it and others like it are just more labels to keep us divided. What does the term mean? And who defines it? People in the US? Japan? W Europe? China? Africa? South America? Are S. American countries 'western'? African countries?
Although I never did get around to reading it, the late Edward Said's "Orientalism" written in the 70s is supposed to take on the idea of 'the orient'. An idea constructed by the colonial west to define 'the other', i.e. Asia. According to Said, the Middle East as well as East Asia have historically been considered 'the orient'. Because of his background being of Palestinian descent he focuses mainly on the M.E. with this cultural construct of the 'orient'.
Maybe Said can help us?
nurizeko said:I always figured "Western" refers to majority white culture and parts of the world.
Like, you can be black and born and raised westerner, but you live in a majority white country.
so basically western is Europe and all its white majority former possessions.
That was my take on it.
So no, Japan wouldnt be western by that criteria.
Arabic cultures invented the concept of zero and much else.
Wow ! What a biased view of world history. You'd better check the thread Which country invented what ?. Nurizeko already corrected you about zero. I don't see much contribution of the Arabic culture into my daily life though.Sukotto said:China invented gun powder, noodles, the compass, whatever else.
Arabic cultures invented the concept of zero and much else.
"Western" culture invented the modern form of rascism and atomic bombs.
I hate that kind of Christian-inspired political correctness and hypocritical statement. In the same way as no two indviduals can be equal, no culture or country in the world are equal. East Asians are much less reluctant than Westerners to admit it because Confucianism (still strong in Japan and South Korea) teaches them that in social relations, when two people meet there is always a person hierarchically higher than the other, based on their age, gender, status, etc. I think that this is a very old-fashioned, sexist and agist (toward younger people) way of seeing the world. But I agree that people are different, in experience, knowledge, intelligence, kindness, mental and physical strength, physical appearance, resistance to diseases, flexibility and a multitude of other things. Societies and cultures are also different, and although it is even more difficult to make the sum of all factors or rate the importance of each factor for cultures than individuals, as we humans cannot help but have values and thus judge, it is inevitable that given a good knowledge of two individuals or two cultures, we will have a preference for one over the other.Whatever. No one culture, nor group of cultures is superior to another/others. period.
Sukotto said:China invented gun powder, noodles, the compass, whatever else.
Arabic cultures invented the concept of zero and much else.
"Western" culture invented the modern form of rascism and atomic bombs.
Whatever. No one culture, nor group of cultures is superior to another/others. period.
Wow ! What a biased view of world history. You'd better check the thread Which country invented what ?. Nurizeko already corrected you about zero. I don't see much contribution of the Arabic culture into my daily life though.
As for China, we discussed some time ago about Chinese inventions, and said at the time, after close scrutiny, that China had not made any major invention since the Antiquity. Even then major (non-cultural) inventions can be summarised in a 3 words : paper, block printing, black powder (although not gun powder as they did not invent guns). We are not sure whether the compass was really invented in China.
I hate that kind of Christian-inspired political correctness and hypocritical statement. In the same way as no two indviduals can be equal, no culture or country in the world are equal. East Asians are much less reluctant than Westerners to admit it because Confucianism (still strong in Japan and South Korea) teaches them that in social relations, when two people meet there is always a person hierarchically higher than the other, based on their age, gender, status, etc. I think that this is a very old-fashioned, sexist and agist (toward younger people) way of seeing the world. But I agree that people are different, in experience, knowledge, intelligence, kindness, mental and physical strength, physical appearance, resistance to diseases, flexibility and a multitude of other things. Societies and cultures are also different, and although it is even more difficult to make the sum of all factors or rate the importance of each factor for cultures than individuals, as we humans cannot help but have values and thus judge, it is inevitable that given a good knowledge of two individuals or two cultures, we will have a preference for one over the other.
It is probably better to compare achievements rather than personal cultural preferences in juding cultures/countries. The fairest way to do it would be to rate the importance of achievements for human kind in general all over the world. For instance, Westerners can live well without cultural Chinese inventions like the accupuncture, arched bridges or traditional Chinese clothes. Likewise the Chinese can live well without Renaissance European garments, medieval armours or Roman acqueducts.
The most difficult thing in comparing cultures is to set a geographic limit to the boundaries of the culture. Should we compare China to England, the UK, Western Europe or all Europe ? I think that Europe is the adequate level, as China also has lots of languages and smaller regional variations in culture, like Europe. Then both are about the same land area (again depending where Europe and China stop geographically - e.g. shall we include Tibet into China and Russia into Europe or not ?).
It's easy, Japan is Japan.
Neither Western, nor Asian. Just Japan, so let it be
I know that USA and AUS ect are also western but that more defined by the state of wealth.
This may have been true 10 or 15 years ago, but things have changed a lot since then. Japan now only ranks 14th for GDP per capita (nominal) and 16th for GDP per capita at PPP, after almost only Western countries (+ Qatar). Japan ranks 18th for GDP per capita per hour, a better indicator of productivity.Japan has a higher Gross National Product per person than most European countries.
The terms "Western" or "Eastern" refer mainly to a country's culture and ethnicity, not its economic level. Otherwise Hong Kong would not be Eastern while being part of China, and Eastern Europe, Greece or Portugal wouldn't be Western, which is nonsensical.So this point counters what Carlos tries to argue.
I suppose he meant "East Asian". Obviously Japan share little 'Asianness' with Iraq or Bangladesh.As a person who newer went to Japan Carlos argues that the architecture in Japan is asian.
So do China or Korea. But tall glass and concrete towers are certainly more a feature of modern East Asian culture than European ones.It is certainly true if we are talking about traditional architecture, but modern japanese architects are today extremely modern and part of the global community of architects.
Again, same for Korea and China, and even Thailand and Malaysia, which kind of proves Carlos' point.Those of us who actually went to Japan are facinated with the mix of traditional and modern - eastern and western which is appearent all over in Japan today.
....First, the geographical opposition between Europe and Asia, but that alone has turned out to be a too simple definition, as Australia or New Zealand are more East than Asia, but definitely Western. So is it a cultural or ethnic distinction rather purely geographical ?
Secondly, Western used to refer to the Capitalist world during the cold war. The East-West opposition was especially valid for Europe, but on a global point of view, America the NATO countries laid West, while the communist world (not only the USSR, but also China and North Korea) laid East.
Finally (I think), most Europeans consider that a Western country is about the same as an industrialised/developped one.
The 2 latter points, Japan is definitely Western.
Japan is as asian as it gets.They will have shared many things with other asian countries.
Japan is real asian
Carlos argues that the architecture in Japan is asian. It is certainly true if we are talking about traditional architecture, but modern japanese architects are today extremely modern and part of the global community of architects. Many of them were educated in Europe and USA and many are also working in these countries.
There are NON-Japanese Asians world class engineers and whatnots,do you ever regard them closer to Western Club ?
S Korea,Singapore,Malaysia,and Hong Kong have many visible modern architectures with a few are designed by native sons and educated in Europe and USA.Do you ever include these NON-Japan Asian nations,a part of so-called Western Architecture Cultural Club ?
The bottom line is who you rather FANCY,as often reflect this view in your posts.
It's the subservient Asian-mentality traditional culturally-Oriental Japanese girls Western men romanticize.Where is the Western-ness,entertain us please ?
And yes, I am a man from the "west", but I do certainly not fit into the stereotype of "romantizicing the subservient Asian-mentality traditional culturally-Oriental Japanese girls". Actually I think you either confuse me with someone else or you are merely trying to provoke me?
When starting this thread Maciamo wrote:
....and today in response to my statement:
...
Does this mean that you changed your mind regarding Japan beeing a industrialised/developped country?
As Japan ranks close to UK and Germany I would still regard it as very wealthy.
There are so many European countries below this level, but still you would not argue that Portugal or Poland is Eastern. Or would you?