This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

How could they solve this problem?

Davey

先輩
Contributor
Joined
5 Feb 2005
Messages
7,694
Reaction score
627
Everyoe knowns it is a big problem in Japan, and also in other countries! so any idea on how they could solve this problem?
1. Maybe they can give more money to parents that get a second child
2. Mothers can take 1 year off without they have to quit their jobs

any other ideas?


 
I don't think money is the biggest issue for Japanese to not to have kids. Therefore, rewarding couples with 2nd child probably won't be very effective. I think the only way to solve Japan's declining population problem is immigration. However, it will take Japanese society some time to adopt the idea of mass immigration.
 
Dave,
I believe a lot of the problem with less children is less marriages! Have you noticed how many men/women in Japan are into their mid to late 30's and still single? They enjoy their freedom too much to tie themselves down with a family. This seems more true for the women then the men. While single and working, they can spend all of their money on themselves and whatever they like. If they had a family, they would have to make sacrifices that they are not yet mature enough to make.
 
I think that plays indeed an important role CC1, btw, congrats with your 1000th post !!!
 
The rate of Japan's aging population is suprising...are japanese people really that un-interested in family?.
 
? ? ?

Any chance LESS population might be a good thing for Japan's future?

UFSI

:?
 
More living space is the only good thing I can think of...
 
eee for immigration maybe... for the rest, less population is not always bad, but 25 years declining??
 
I think there would be problems with the economy if the population gets dramatically smaller in a short period of time. They'll have lots of jobs with no one to work them. Of course, it seems like that would just mean a smaller economy for a smaller country, but I've been given the impression that it's a major problem.
 

UFSI said:
Any chance LESS population might be a good thing for Japan's future?
UFSI
:?

The important thing is the dependancy ratio. If there are no kids going into work but people are still living a long time then a larger number of people will need to live of a smaller number of jobs. - everybody gets a lot poorer. That is the major problem, not the population level.
 
Riiiiight. That makes sense. Yeah, there won't be enough workers to support the retirees. Thanks for pointing that out, Kat.
 
Glenn said:
Riiiiight. That makes sense. Yeah, there won't be enough workers to support the retirees. Thanks for pointing that out, Kat.
I think, it's a bit more complicated regarding the dependency ratio. Whether the age pyramid is A- (more kids) or V- (more pensioners) shaped doesn't seem to make that much of a difference. When other factors come into play (eg. unemployment), it may get really interesting.
 
Oh...haven't been 'round these parts lately...

Yeah, KrazyKat got that information correct--and to think, the government has known about it for a while basically. I recall seeing posters down at the village hall way back in '98 explaining the number of workers that would be supporting the over 62 age group in 2015 (or so...I can't recall that exact year given) and it was something like 4.5 to 10.

Another matter that appears (and I emphasize 'appears') to be coming package and parcel with this enigma is a widening of whatever gap there had been between the haves and the have-nots.

So, in order to help support the aging, with all that insurance stuff, why wouldn't Japan invite immigration? Perhaps it boils down to the old 'Samurai spirit' of saving face by self-destruction? Perhaps a sense of distrust on behalf of the geater powers within the government? I can't say.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…