Isnt the acting subject of both the experimenter?別の実験では同じ形で同じ大きさの箱を2つ持ってもら って、どちらの箱が重いか尋ねました。
My translation: "In another experiment, (people) were given (lit. received) two boxes of the same shape and size to hold, and (we) asked them which was heavier."
Is it right that the subject of 尋ねました is the person performing the experiment, and yet the subject of 持ってもらって is the person on whom the experiment is performed? If so, does this unannounced switch of subject seem at all awkward in Japanese, or is it fine?
I'm going to guess its the same as "あめがふりだしそうだ"2. 雨が降り出そうだ。
Translation given: "It looks like it's going to start raining any second now."
Is 出そう simply the volitional form of 出す, or does it have something to do with そうだ as in "seems/looks like"?
Hrm, it reminds me of the word "~といわんばかり" which is something like "everything just short of saying ~" . In that case, its the negative plain for verb + ばかり meaning "just shy of "Hiya,
1. 雨が降り出さんばかりだ。
Translation given: "It looks like it's going to start raining any second now."
What is 降り出さん? Presumably derived from 降り出す, but I don't understand the さん (or is it さ + ん?) ending. I seem to remember that ~ん can be short for ~ない, but would that make sense here?
Actually, I think you're right. It just occurred to me that もら って means that the experimenters received the favour of someone doing sth. for them (i.e. "we had people hold two boxes"), not that the subjects of the experiment received the boxes. I think I've made this mistake several times. I should remember by now!Isnt the acting subject of both the experimenter?
Right. It's 降り出さ(the pre -nai form of 降り出す) + ん. This ん is the n-euphonic change of む; the adjectival form(連体形) of a classical auxiliary verb む, which expresses the speaker's guess.1. 雨が降り出さんばかりだ。
Translation given: "It looks like it's going to start raining any second now."
What is 降り出さん? Presumably derived from 降り出す, but I don't understand the さん (or is it さ + ん?) ending. I seem to remember that ~ん can be short for ~ない, but would that make sense here?
I think it's simply a typo of 雨が降り出しそうだ.2. 雨が降り出そうだ。
Translation given: "It looks like it's going to start raining any second now."
Is 出そう simply the volitional form of 出す, or does it have something to do with そうだ as in "seems/looks like"?
Yes. It's 怒る+たい+なる; to be tempted to get angry (literally, to become to be a state of getting angry).3.
A: 「はらが立つ」って、どういうことですか。
B: 「おこりたくなる」ということですよ。
Translation given:
A: What does it mean, 「はらが立つ」?
B: It means to get angry.
What is おこりたくなる? I know おこる means "to get angry", but I don't understand the -たく- part. It looks like it's something do do with wanting to get angry??
As srintuar-san pointed out, the subjent of 持ってもらう is "we", the person(s) performing the experiment.4. Another verb-て question. I apologise if it's similar to any I've asked before.
別の実験では同じ形で同じ大きさの箱を2つ持ってもらって、どちらの箱が重いか尋ねました。
My translation: "In another experiment, (people) were given (lit. received) two boxes of the same shape and size to hold, and (we) asked them which was heavier."
Is it right that the subject of 尋ねました is the person performing the experiment, and yet the subject of 持ってもらって is the person on whom the experiment is performed? If so, does this unannounced switch of subject seem at all awkward in Japanese, or is it fine?
Thanks Toritoribe. You mention classical Japanese; could I confirm which of the above forms are used in modern Japanese? Well, I know that ~しそう and ~さない are, of course. And I assume that ~さん in the first sense above is in current use, since it was in my example sentence? What about ~さむ, ~さぬ and ~さん in the second sense above? All old-fashioned?降り出さむ → 降り出さん = 降り出しそう
降り出さぬ → 降り出さん = 降り出さない
ばかり【許り】[副助]の意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書4 (動詞の連体形または助動詞「ぬ(ん)」を受けて)ある動作が今にも行われようとする状態を表す。「いつでも出発できる―になっている」「泣き出さん―の顔」
ぬ[助動]の意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書(「ねばならぬ(ん)」「ねばなるまい」の形で)当然・義務の意を表す。「明日は会社に八時までに行かねばならぬ」/行かねばならん(= 行かなければならない)
む(ム)とは - コトバンク現代語でも文語調の文章の中に「ん」の形で用いられる。「幸多からんことを祈る」「政治家たらんとする者は」「あらん限りの力」「まさに出発せんとする時」
So, going back to the original sentence, are you saying that 雨が降り出さんばかりだ = 雨が降り出さぬばかりだ = 雨が降り出さないばかりだ?Sorry, I apparently misinterpreted about ん.It actually is the n-euphonic change of ぬ(the negation auxiliary verb), and not む.
This is how i made sense of it:I must admit I'm still confused about this one. As I understand it from your post, ん in 雨が降り出さんばかりだ is "the n-euphonic change of ぬ (the negation auxiliary verb)". With ばかり meaning "to be about to do/to be just going to do", the sentence would therefore appear to mean "It's about to not start raining", which is the exact opposite of the translation given. Does ん/ぬ somehow lose its negative sense in this particular context?
Oh, my! I mistook again!!I must admit I'm still confused about this one. As I understand it from your post, ん in 雨が降り出さんばかりだ is "the n-euphonic change of ぬ (the negation auxiliary verb)". With ばかり meaning "to be about to do/to be just going to do", the sentence would therefore appear to mean "It's about to not start raining", which is the exact opposite of the translation given. Does ん/ぬ somehow lose its negative sense in this particular context?
ぬばかりの意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書《完了の助動詞「ぬ」の終止形+副助詞「ばかり」》動詞の連用形に付く。今にも…してしまいそうに。…しただけ。
ぬ[助動]の意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書[助動][な|に|ぬ|ぬる|ぬれ|ね]
ぬ[助動]の意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書[助動][〇|ず(ん)|ぬ(ん)|ぬ(ん)|ね|〇]
ぬばかりの意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書《打消しの助動詞「ず」の連体形+副助詞「ばかり」》動詞の未然形に付く。…ないだけ。…ないほど。
《完了の助動詞「ぬ」の終止形+副助詞「ばかり」》動詞の連用形に付く。今にも…してしまいそうに。…しただけ。
Oh! In English, the perfect tense would be "It looks like it's about to have started raining". Is it the same idea in Japanese? (As it happens, this usage isn't very natural in English.)It's not the ぬ of the nagation but the ぬ of the perfect tense.
Yes, I think so.Oh! In English, the perfect tense would be "It looks like it's about to have started raining". Is it the same idea in Japanese? (As it happens, this usage isn't very natural in English.)
Yeah, we can easily differentiate the usages 雨が降り出さんばかりだ(be about to), 彼が来ないばかりに(because), 雨ばかりか雪まで降ってきた(besides) and so on.Also, can I just check: Is the sentence 雨が降り出さんばかりだ standard modern Japanese that you can read and understand perfectly easily, and all the difficulties we've had simply result from unravelling the etymological origin of this ん in old Japanese?
I think "the perfect tense ぬ" makes sense.EDIT: what do you think of Srintuar's interpretation in his latest post?
ぬ(ヌ)とは - コトバンク(2)本来、古語の推量の助動詞「む」から生じたと考えられる「あらん限り」「泣かんばかり 」の「ん」との混同から、「あらぬ限り」「泣かぬばかり」などの言い方が みられる。「あら〈ぬ〉限りの力を振りしぼって頑張っ た」「それは当然の事だと言は〈ぬ〉ばかりの顔をした 」
ぬばかり(ヌバカリ)とは - コトバンク〔2〕 〔補説〕 完了の助動詞「ぬ」の終止形「ぬ」に副助詞「ばかり」 の付いたもの
[1] 文末に用いられる場合。…してしまうだけ。…してしま うくらい。
消えはててやみ―か年をへて君を思ひのしるしなければ 〔出典: 後撰(恋一)〕
[2] 文中に用いられる場合。…してしまいそうなくらい。
かきくらし思ひ乱れて、枕も浮き―人やりならず流しそ へつつ〔出典: 源氏(柏木)〕