declarative sentenceIs もらう for when someone did something for you without asking, and くれる is for when you asked?
1a. E.g what's the difference between 読んでくれないか and 読んでもらえないか? Or 助けてもらった and 助けてくれた? (first is politeness levels, second is of someones own accord, and because I asked them.)
気持ちだけで、じゅうぶんだから。1b. 気持ちだけで、じゅうぶんだから。(やってもらえるこ とも、ないし) does this mean, for the meaning, "It's the thought that counts, after all. (and It's not like she can do anything else for me)" In a positive, grateful sense because the adresse can't do much in her current situation. Could it have been やってくれられること?
& is relatively common. It means "and" as same as in English, and pronounced アンド or occasionally と.3.切ない&可愛い&綺麗!How often is "&" used like that? Does it mean "and" in the same English sense? Is it pronouned? One time I saw in a song 夢&夢 and it looked like the & just seperated it for ease because it was just ゆめ、ゆめ。
I see. Yes, that does make sense.I would say 読んでくれないか is 'Won't you read this for me?' (Asking listener to give to speaker) and 読んでもらえないか? is 'Couldn't I have you read this for me?' (Wondering aloud if the speaker is able to receive a favor from the listener). Politeness follows because the second is more indirect, but the grammatical difference of 'will you give' and 'can I have' is pretty substantial.
Thanks for the definition!mostly it means 'hooked on' like a... a song or musician, a tv show, a game, or so forth. This is recent use so only in newer and thorough dictionaries.
Thanks for writing all of that information, it was helpful. So with the subjects being different, it's like:Thus, a) 読んでくれないか and 読んでもらえないか? are almost the same, b) the subject of 助けてもらった and the subject of 助けてくれた are different.
気持ちだけで、じゅうぶんだから。
That thought is enough for me. / I appreciate the thought.
やってもらえることも、ないし
There is nothing you/he/she can do for me.
やってくれられること doesn't make sense.
Thanks. I've only seen it twice. I should look around more.& is relatively common. It means "and" as same as in English, and pronounced アンド or occasionally と.
Your interpretation is basically correct, but the difference is subtle, as SomeCallMeChris-san already pointed out. See the following examples. One of the reasons to switch the subject is to unify the subjects of the two clauses. In these cases, ~てくれる and ~てもらう are not interchangeable.If this is the case, does てくれる focus more on the person who did the favour? They both have different subjects, so in Japanese what is the nuance of the two? What effect does switching the subject have linguistically?
Your translation is fine.Yeah, these were what I thought of when I read the sentences, but I thought translation wise, I would write what I did Are my translations far from what should be felt?
I can't tell, either. It depends on the character of the lowyer.Just one thing, about(やってもらえることも、ないし) In what sense is it meant?
It's a joke, of course!Also, whilst I'm here, "冗談に決まってるじゃないか!" I probaly get the overall meaning but not how 冗談に決まってる works depsite knowing what boths the words mean. Mainly how 決まってる is used here, I would like to know.
きまる【決(ま)る/極まる】の意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書3 (「…にきまっている」の形で)疑う余地がなく、当然である。きっとそうである。また、必ずそうなる。「冬は寒いに―・っている」「そんなことを言われれば、だれだって怒るに―・っている」
くれる doesn't have the potential form. So, the answer is no. できることもないし can be an alternative.Does やって"any version of くれる"こと make sense? Or is it just wrong?
Because literally what もらう is saying is that you are getting someone to do something
助けてくれた He helped me
助けてもらった I got him to help
してくれる? Will you do this for me?
してもらえる? Can I get you to do this?
読んでくれた He read it for me
読んでもらった I got him to read it
Even if it doesn't always translate that way, the underlying meaning will be that you are getting someone to do something.
So:Your interpretation is basically correct, but the difference is subtle, as SomeCallMeChris-san already pointed out. See the following examples. One of the reasons to switch the subject is to unify the subjects of the two clauses. In these cases, ~てくれる and ~てもらう are not interchangeable.
私は助けてもらおうと大声を上げた。
彼は私を助けてくれようとしてかなり無理をした。
It's similar to a function of the passive voice.
ツ貢ナ陳」窶堙ー窶戳窶堙溪?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙 / ヒ?ク窶堋ォ窶堙や?堋ッ窶堋ス / ツ催?彙 / 窶佚・窶堋ォ窶堋ュ窶「ツェ窶堋ッ窶堙??愿ア窶堙 | Japan Forum
Oh okay, thanks for that tooYour translation is fine.I just gave a literal translation.
Oh, so it depends. Well I found the official translation it happens to be "(And there really isn'tI can't tell, either. It depends on the character of the lowyer.
Thanks!It's a joke, of course!
~に決まっている
It's no doubt~. / It must be~. / It's ~ of course.
きまる【決(ま)る/極まる】の意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書
くれる doesn't have the potential form. So, the answer is no. できることもないし can be an alternative.
Added to the explanations above くれるis usually more casual than もらう。
~てくれませんか
~てもらいませんか
of the two ~てくれませんか is the one you would use with friends or for casual situations.
助けてもらおうとした
tried to have someone help
大声を上げようとした
tried to cry out
彼は私を助けてくれようと(して)大声を上げた。 = 彼は私を助けてくれるために大声を上げた。
He cried out to help me.
The most important difference between くれる and もらう other than the subjects is that くれる can be used ONLY WHEN the recipient of the favor is the speaker or an in-group member of the speaker. For instance, you can use 彼は彼女を助けてあげた or 彼女は彼に助けてもらった whoever 彼女 is, whereas 彼は彼女を助けてくれた can be used only when 彼女 is your in-group member.
~てもらいませんか = ~てもらったらどうですか
How about you ask someone to do for you?
~てもらえませんか
Can I ask you to do for me?
~てくれませんか and ~てもらえませんか is a polite expression, so these are not casual and not used between friends. Instead, ~てくれる?, ~てくれない? or ~てくれ is used for the case.
~ていただけませんか, ~てくださいませんか, ~をお願いできませんか or like that is more common in formal situation.
An in-group member, as in, someone who is in the conversation? Not someone who would normally be referred to in the third person?
Yes,that's right. You can use ~てもらえる? or ~てもらえない? in almost the same meaning.Again I suppose. Subtle though right?
in-group is those people that you would use humble speech in reference to if you were being polite, and out-group is everyone else. It changes with context, and is roughly the set of people that you would mean if you said 'we' in English in the same context, but in Japanese it's important for choosing verbs. (Edit: That is, a 'we' not meaning 'you and me' with the person you're speaking to, but rather 'we' meaning 'my family and me' 'my company and me' 'my friends and me' or whatever. Maybe the parallel isn't so good after all. )
The concept should be discussed in any decent textbook, usually when giving-receiving words are first discussed, though terminology might vary.
Yes,that's right. You can use ~てもらえる? or ~てもらえない? in almost the same meaning.
An in-group member usually refers to someone who is more close to you than the one you are talking to, e.g., family members, relatives or colleagues. くれる is used only when the recipient of the favor is more close to you than the giver of the favor. For instance, in a sentence 彼は妹に花を買ってくれた, 妹 refers to your(= the speaker's) sister, whereas as for 彼は妹に花を買ってあげた/やった, 妹 would refer to his sister. The recipient of the favor of くれる is the speaker themselves in most cases, though.