Culture Why Japan is quick to tear down its modern architectural masterpieces

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,050
Reaction score
18,903
The NYT explains why Japan does not preserve much of its modern architecture.

Razed:

Old Hotel Okura
Old Hotel Okura


Nakagin Capsule Tower
Nakagin Capsule Tower

To be razed:

Kagawa Prefectural Gymnasium by Kenzo Tange
Kagawa Prefectural Gymnasium

Administered by the Agency for Cultural Affairs, various levels of historic preservation do exist. But midcentury buildings have yet to benefit in a big way. Treasured for their enduring beauty, cultural value and link to the past, traditional timber temples and teahouses or Meiji era (1868-1912) red brick edifices are regularly protected. By contrast, buildings made of glass, steel and concrete seldom stick around long enough to acquire a comparable patina. In 1996, the government extended the scope of its preservation program to 50-year-old buildings. However, this coverage is neither ironclad nor irretractable. Buildings can still be altered or delisted and then torn down. And the expense of refurbishing and maintaining these properties is borne mostly by owners.

Gift article:
 
Back
Top Bottom