Protesters held on Japanese whaling ship

Here is an interesting article from the last days, about Inwood:

A Maori voice for a Japanese cause

Not that much new, but all together there.
Yet the writer also is not blind, one has to read all the way through!

I did not know the reason for his former (resignment) case, but had my guesses alright, as I can read now.

Plus:

But hunting whales also provides Mr Inwood with his own bread and butter.

plus:

The New Zealand Herald reported in 2006 that he has worked as a consultant for Te Ohu Kaimoana, an organisation devoted to advancing Maori fishing interests. It is also reportedly the sole voting shareholder in Aotearoa Fisheries, which in turn owns half of the major New Zealand seafood company Sealord. The other half is owned by a Japanese company, Nissui, which is also a shareholder in Japan's whaling fleet.

An experienced public relations agent, Michael Smith, whose former company took on a contract for Japanese whalers nine years ago, likened Mr Inwood's role to "representing seal clubbers".

Mr Smith's firm, Shandwick International, ran into trouble running a campaign on behalf of the Japanese Whaling Association. The company also had a contract with the International Fund for Animal Welfare to run a campaign in Britain against fox hunting - a deal which Shandwick lost when its whaling work became known to the animal-welfare activists.

In retrospect, it had probably been a mistake to take the brief, Mr Smith said. "It was just a case of the Japanese were sick of coming to Australia and getting ambushed everywhere, they wanted to get their own story out."

Mr Smith, who is not pro-whaling, said Mr Inwood would continue to face an uphill battle to sell his message, but that it would be unlikely to affect the whales themselves.

"I don't think the Japanese really care that much about public opinion in Australia."

Bob Burton, author of Inside Spin and an observer of the whaling industry's twists and turns, said Mr Inwood was a valuable asset for the Institution of Cetacean Research but the public relations battle could not be won.
"It's a bit like the asbestos industry - they are defending the indefensible, and the strategy is to keep on stalling. In the long term, though, it's hard to see anything other than the strategy unravelling."

My say. . .its too obvious for what it really is.

Not, that I have anything against Maoris either, but its a much more personal domination/recognition fight after all.
Maybe I should ask him to have some drink together and then paint something, that includes his maori style on equal level? I would not mind.

He seems to have a lack in attention for more than just the whales-case, but lives it out on them . . . .in an "I will show them" way. . .
Somewhat more than familiar to mums(and psychologists, by the way), right?


Bambi-factor?
Very cheap excuse indeed. . .right, Sarapva. Just watch out when that comes, and it will.
 
http://rokdrop.com/2008/01/16/japanese-whaling-update/

It's very one-sided, but also a very interesting read IMHO.

After you read this article you might think I am pro-whaling. This is not true, however. I am simply anti-Sea Shepherd.

Its your right, to put something on the scales, and it was also interesting.
Thanks for posting!
As said, I am not necessarily pro Watson etc., although I can understand them somehow.
After all, they are not the only ones at all, who have reasons against such whalings (as one can additionally read in the other article, as facts), and it should not all be thrown into one pot.
I personally would be happy, if it all could be somehow balanced and come back to honesty.

But as for the last forbidden ship for refuelling, the others are not better at all, nor anywhere near that, in contrary. Against such illegal methods, Watson is just a little mosquito after all, sorry to say.

Yet, very welcome, Half-n-Half, you'll have all chances to see things from all sides in these times. Be proud about this and stay awake! :-)
 
Yes - it's good to have both sides here. Some funny parts in that article, Half-n-Half.
 

Caster 51:

No offence intended but I don't think it's important who or what the Sea Sheapard is or what they do.

It's more important to focus on the whalers and what they are doing, pros and cons, etc., after all, that's wht the thread is about.

I think we can all be sure that all members of the Shepard have their heads screwed on and have a clear motive for what they believe in.

On the other hand, it's difficult to get a grasp on the whalers, who they are, what they have to say publicly, etc.

It may indeed be that some members on board do not agree with killing the whales.. Who knows?

I'm not sure, but would hazard a strong guess that they have been censored from media interviews by Japanese law, possibly because of what they might say..

Let's wait and see.
 
The good thing of this forum is, one can get the informations from different sides, from all over the world, which makes it much more easy to compare and find out, what is nothing but PR and whats not. :-)
 
The good thing of this forum is, one can get the informations from different sides, from all over the world, which makes it much more easy to compare and find out, what is nothing but PR and whats not. :-)

Indeed... Very much a multi say nation forum
 
What is the true purpose of SeaShepherd's activity? SeaShepherd is always conscious of their image on camera. SeaShepherd never play an active role without camera sneakingly. The true purpose of SeaShepherd's antiwhaling activity is, by showing their battle for life against Japanese whaling research ships to the world, to collect contributions from the world. SeaShepherd is no longer environmental organization. SeaShepherd is just "Money-mad" to obtain money from the world by tricks.
SeaShepherd's propaganda for antiwhaling has been appealing focused on barbarousness of Japanese whaling to viewer's emotions with videos repeatedly and sneakingly even though farmanimal's slaughterhouse is as brutal as whaling. As a result, anti-whalers have strong hatred for not only Japanese whaling but also Japanese people even though they can eat meat without hesitation because they don't know the reality of farmanimal's slaughterhouse. Australians must watch them!
Australians enjoy watching SeaShepherd's antiwhaling activity wages a fearlessly courageous battle against Japanese whaling research ships on TV for entertainment. Videos of SeaShepherd's antiwhaling activity seems that "white-hat" SeaShepherd's warriors fight a battle against "black hat" Japanese research ship. This is SeaShepherd just set Japan up as "the villain" like Hollywood action movie. Kevin Rudd who is famous for "Earwax Eater" noted the fact and used for political purposes.
The backroom fixer of Anti-whaling movement is International meat-industry organization (America and Australia). SeaShepherd has been getting vast contribution of money from International meat-industry organization and has been promoting unnecessary Anti-whaling movement. SeaShepherd' is not environmental group but TERRORISTS. SeaShepherd' has become just "Money-mad" that we Japanese should hate. SeaShepherd has been arousing strong hatred against Japanese people!
Ecologic Terrorists. "TERRORISTS" posing as a environmental group is SeaShepherd...this is the common perception of the world. We Japanese have strong resentment against SeaShepherd who has been taking destructive activities by brute force sneakingly and repeatedly. We Japanese who have made a declaration of fighting against "TERRORISM" never forgive SeaShepherd up to eradicate members of SeaShepherd.
Now, Australia is genuine terrorism-supporting state. Australia stands up for SeaShepherd who violates International Law of the Sea and takes destructive activities in name of antiwhaling. Australia encourages SeaShepherd's destructive activities, SeaShepherd is well-known for "Ecologic terrorists" not only in Japan but also rest of the world. We Japanese never forgive Australia.


 
Japan is not the only one, who has to say something, esp. not obviously flamings.

See the new UN thread...
 
I don't leave here terrorist said 。。LOL



Australian media and gervenment faked ...?
 
Lol, but they did not show, which sauce they ordered with the Tempura, as one requested to know before, hehe.
They could have force fed them with toxic whale meat though, to make them leave. . .right
 
I don't leave here terrorist said ツ。ツ。窶嗅窶嗜窶嗅



Australian media and gervenment faked ...?


Hehehe..

Did you report it?

I think the "terrorist" was working for the government and fish'n'chip chop in the iivaning..
 
Back
Top Bottom