- 4 Sep 2015
- 2,306
- 1,906
its new, but they are already saying its 70% more contagious . something doesn't sound right. is it because of the political EU Brexit: UK-EU trade talks enter critical 48-hour period - BBC News
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it's new, but they are already saying its 70% more contagious. something doesn't sound right. is it because of the political EU Brexit: UK-EU trade talks enter critical 48-hour period - BBC News.
It's over my head, I don't care that much about the science to try to understand it either, but: the main COVID strain had a transmission of 0.7, and this new strain is 1.1, that is, approximately 70% more. Thing is, the 0.7 and 1.1 numbers don't mean much to laypeople (and I have read what it means, I just completely forgot, partly because I'm a layperson) so they use the terminology of 70%.its new, but they are already saying its 70% more contagious . something doesn't sound right. is it because of the political EU Brexit: UK-EU trade talks enter critical 48-hour period - BBC News
Actually, it's quite easy - less than 1 is good and more than 1 is bad! I wasn't making a political comment, I was just expressing sympathy for my fellow Brits for having to deal with the Brexit transition (admittedly an entirely self-imposed problem) in a country with poor organization skills (because the politicians farm off the tasks to their mates - sorry, I am being political now!) at the same time as a pandemic, then having the bad luck to experience a mutation that makes the problem even worse.It's over my head, I don't care that much about the science to try to understand it either, but: the main COVID strain had a transmission of 0.7, and this new strain is 1.1, that is, approximately 70% more. Thing is, the 0.7 and 1.1 numbers don't mean much to laypeople (and I have read what it means, I just completely forgot, partly because I'm a layperson) so they use the terminology of 70%.
I don't think there's anything political about it, it's just that the new strain is appearing and spreading at a higher rate than the main one. No blame on UK either, anymore than a Chinese person is to blame for the original strain.
Actually, it's quite easy - less than 1 is good and more than 1 is bad! I wasn't making a political comment, I was just expressing sympathy for my fellow Brits for having to deal with the Brexit transition (admittedly an entirely self-imposed problem) in a country with poor organization skills (because the politicians farm off the tasks to their mates - sorry, I am being political now!) at the same time as a pandemic, then having the bad luck to experience a mutation that makes the problem even worse.
Yes, it's been a real blow to British people, who feel that "Christmas has been cancelled". There's also the worry in Britain about it officially leaving the EU customs zone at the end of the year and the effect that this will have on the smooth flow of goods (there are already delays and are likely to be shortages of some goods soon). It feels like a bleak place when I read the news and phone my family there.
Good question. Not traditionally because of the lack of natural disasters in the country. However, with Britain nearly crashing out of Europe without a deal a year ago, which would have suddenly massively slowed down imports from the EU and created chaos, and people, especially older people, practising social distancing, British people are much better prepared than they would have been five years ago.Do British people believe in storing food for at least a months supply?
The 70% is purely a back of the envelope calculation i.e. conjecture. They really don't know if it's more transmissible or if a few superspreaders happened to boost that strain into prominence. But they don't have time to wait a few weeks for the boffins to figure it out hence the high alert and warnings.It's over my head, I don't care that much about the science to try to understand it either, but: the main COVID strain had a transmission of 0.7, and this new strain is 1.1, that is, approximately 70% more. Thing is, the 0.7 and 1.1 numbers don't mean much to laypeople (and I have read what it means, I just completely forgot, partly because I'm a layperson) so they use the terminology of 70%.
Well if I were in Britain I'd be stocking up on Camembert cheese and macaroons and champagne at this very moment. At least enough to get me through new years.Good question. Not traditionally because of the lack of natural disasters in the country. However, with Britain nearly crashing out of Europe without a deal a year ago, which would have suddenly massively slowed down imports from the EU and created chaos, and people, especially older people, practising social distancing, British people are much better prepared than they would have been five years ago.
www.forbes.com
I got tested once and the nurse just wiggled the swab around in my nose a little bit. Just ticklish, not painful at all but I was doubtful about how reliable her method was considering everything I had read about. Since we were confident we weren't sick and were only getting tested in order to travel it didn't really concern me at the time.I have never been tested for the coronavirus, but judging by what I have heard from my family in Europe those nose swabs are really painful.
![]()
China Deploys Anal Swab Tests To Detect High-Risk Covid-19 Cases
Experts say the test, rolled out before millions are expected to travel for the Lunar New Year, could be more accurate than throat and nose swabs.www.forbes.com
I took my mom for her first shot (Moderna) last weekend. Next one in four weeks. She had no reaction or ill effects but they say the second shot you're more likely to feel some symptoms (such as chills, headache, fever) so I'm planning to stay the night with her next time. She's 88 and lives alone.I was shocked to get a call a few days ago that I get my first shot today. When I signed up just 2 weeks ago , they said they had no clue when the shots might be available. I thought it was interesting that you get the second shot 28 days after the first instead of 2 weeks. I must be a bit worried about a reaction ; I had a bad nightmare about everyone who got the shot was laying on the floor dying. If I do have any reaction to it , Ill post here about it. Now all we have to do is get my wife set up for her shot and I'll be happy.
On the bright side, we know your body is getting primed to fight this virus. Make sure you get the second shot and you should be well protected. Did your wife have any symptoms?WOW! The first covid shot kicked my butt. Been in bed for 2 days , sick as a dog. Like having a weeks worth of a bad flu in just 2 days. Got up today and it was gone. They say it's the second shot that makes you sick , so now I'm nervous about getting that one.