- 21 May 2003
- 13,076
- 2,915
- 334
Please....
leave me off the list, I'm TOOOOOOO crazy,daisy,hazy,krazy,lazy,racey.
Uncle Frank
leave me off the list, I'm TOOOOOOO crazy,daisy,hazy,krazy,lazy,racey.
Uncle Frank
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mike Cash said:Not very likely to happen.
Take a look at the number of people logged onto JREF at any given time.
For example, when I came it it was:
Currently Active Users: 366 (15 members and 351 guests) - Total users last 1hrs : 576 (25 members and 551 guests)
As you can see, those of us who actually open our mouths on any given topic and actively participate are a distinct minority.
Maciamo said:Please keep in mind that no one will be selected as moderator if at least an admin (or a moderator if their opinion is requested) has a serious objection.
I disagree all the time.CC1 said:or someone who disagreed with management
Well, if anyone does come on they are going to be naturally suspect as part of the Establishment....not that anyone in their right mind would particularly want the job now.CC1 said:Basically no matter how qualified the individual may be, if they are not 100% a "yes man" to Maciamo there is no chance of them being selected. God forbid there was a well rounded staff, or someone who disagreed with management, but thought of the greater good of the forum.
Maciamo said:CC1, we have almost 19,000 members on this board. I am sure that hundreds if not thousands could qualify to become moderators, but we only need a dozen of them. So it is only fair to select them according to the Team's own preferences.
CC1, we have almost 19,000 members on this board. I am sure that hundreds if not thousands could qualify to become moderators, but we only need a dozen of them. So it is only fair to select them according to the Team's own preferences.
Dutch Baka said:Because Eupedia used to be a part of Jref, the members were the same.
then there was the split. Do you take all the users with you, or do you let everybody make a new members acount? So I think there should be no problem with this, and I don`t understand why you guys want to make Eupedia look bad, in this way... Searching for everything that is wrong with it.. come one. (if I am wrong sorry about it, but I don`t get the feeling that I am wrong with this.)
Just do your thing here, have fun posting, and stop searching for bad all the time.
Dutch Baka said:Because Eupedia used to be a part of Jref, the members were the same.
.
We will need to import all current users into the new Eupedia database, however, we will comply with any requests to be removed from the new forum. Current members will be able to post at both fora.
thomas said:We have informed our members at the Japan Forum several times that they may request to be removed from the Eupedia database:
=> JREF Roadmap
Mike Cash said:That's very nice and thanks for pointing that out to us.
I would like to be removed, if I'm on the Eupedia database.
And while the option to request removal is gracious and appreciated, shouldn't this have been an "opt-in" rather than an "opt-out" deal?
Mike Cash said:That's very nice and thanks for pointing that out to us.
I would like to be removed, if I'm on the Eupedia database.
And while the option to request removal is gracious and appreciated, shouldn't this have been an "opt-in" rather than an "opt-out" deal?
Hachiro said:What about people that "joined" the board after the split or the thread regarding the "opt-out"?
Well, members who joined any of our fora after the split are either JREF or Eupedia members. There is no automatic membership at both fora.
I have removed you too, Mr. Hachiro.
Mike Cash said:I think you mean you joined on February 5th. They use the screwy European convention for the date, which throws me every time I see it.
I think this is starting to get a tad off-topic...
thomas said:Better now?