I would use (hontou no or chanto) kimochi in this sentence, but perhaps either is OK. At least there is no くれられる though so that part is a mistake.nice gaijin said:I'm coming down with something awful, but here's a shot
僕はちゃんと気分を表してくれる(くれられる)女性が好きです。
I like women who (can) properly express their feelings to me.
彼女を知っている人誰でもと話した。
I have spoken to everyone who knew her.
たとえば: Is this correct?
この仕事のタイプを前した人誰でもと聞きましたか?
Have you asked anybody who has done this type of work before?
Another example. Probably wrong too:
私に彼女の本当の気分を教えている女の子が大好きと思います。
I like a girl who can tell me her true feelings.
or
君(~さん)みる女の子がすきと思います。
I like a girl like(similar to) you.
彼女を知っている人皆(みんな)と話した。
The second sentence should be 誰か and not 誰でも
Other changes that must be made in the second one:
このタイプの仕事を前にした人誰かに[
私に自分の本当の気持ちを教えてくれる女の子が大好きです。
HTH
面白いなああとおもいます。 この文について聞いた日本人友達は英訳なしで、何が言いたかったのこのタイプの仕事を前にした人誰かに聞きましたか?
うむ~本当は全面改訂が必要ですか、そこまでして、いいかどうか、私には判断しかねますね。そうすると学習の意味がなくなると思いますが?Elizabeth said:面白いなああとおもいます。 この文について聞いた日本人友達は英訳なしで、何が言いたかったの
か良くわからないって言いました。「人」か「誰か」かなのか、ニュアンスがつかめないのは
問題になりますか?
It depends on what you want to say.Damicci said:Could you say:
このタイプの仕事を前にした人誰もに聞きませんでしたか?
がを入れたほうが正しいです。Damicci said:そして、またこの文正のタイプを作ろうしていましたが、恋人は文正を分かりませんでした。
前に比べて日本語の勉強に熱心ではないと言う事ですか?Damicci said:Yeah, Maybe I should take a short break.
Damicci said:この旅行会社から切符を前買った人誰もに聞きませんで したか?
Both Mae ni and dare ni mo are fine I think -- just make it fit the pattern of Epigene's first example (unless hito is also necessary hereGlenn said:Also, I'm pretty sure 文正 should be 文章. 文正 refers to a span of time from Feb 28, 1466 to March 5, 1467.
Drop the 前. 買った will show that the people have already bought the tickets. If you want someone who has bought tickets from the company then you can say この旅行会社から切符を買ったことが(の)ある人. I think the use of この is a bit strange here, though, unless you're standing in the store or something. As for the 誰にも I would probably not say it, but I'm not sure what the exact nuance and grammaticality of it are.
Really? My first instinct upon seeing this sentence was to parse it as:Elizabeth said:Still another closely worded variation...
このタイプの仕事を前にしたのは誰か聞きましたか?
これはまったく意味が違ってきますね。One possible translation I can conjure up for this one would be "Did someone hear that this type of work has been done before?"
Yeah, it took me a lot of effort to come up with my interpretation too.jt_ said:Really? My first instinct upon seeing this sentence was to parse it as:
"Did you ask who did this type of work before?"
As in, we know that there's someone who has done this type of work before, and we're trying to find out the identity of that person. Was it Mr. Tanaka? Was it Mr. Smith? Did you ask (some other, unspecified person) who it was that did the work?
It would take a lot of effort for me to interpret it the way you did. I have some ideas as to why this is, but I should probably wait for a native speaker (or someone more native than me) to confirm that my reading is okay.
The distinction between someone and "who" is correct, but this is the sentence in your original post. The translation that jt_suggested for のは誰か is not just someone in general, in this case think of 誰 か as two separate words, asking the particular person who did the work.JT_ looking at Elizabeth's example I can understand why you would read it that way. At first glance I see it as "Did/Have you asked "someone" who has done this type of work before?" Only saying "someone" because in class we learned the dare+ka becomes and unknown someone and dare alone is "who".
I'm thinking also, perhaps this is a mistake and should be dare da ka kikimashitaka? :?jt_ said:Really? My first instinct upon seeing this sentence was to parse it as:
"Did you ask who did this type of work before?"
As in, we know that there's someone who has done this type of work before, and we're trying to find out the identity of that person. Was it Mr. Tanaka? Was it Mr. Smith? Did you ask (some other, unspecified person) who it was that did the work?
It would take a lot of effort for me to interpret it the way you did. I have some ideas as to why this is, but I should probably wait for a native speaker (or someone more native than me) to confirm that my reading is okay.