Jent said:I probably put this is the wrong place... :?
The question I really want to ask, is, is racism as prevalent in other countries as it is here in the states? I'm sure it's everywhere, I was just curious. And especially in Japan I'm asking. It seems like there is quite a bit of it in the states, and that could just be because where I live, I don't know. Fill me in.
I have no first hands experience living in Japan. But the last part of your question is interesting. With some criticism that the US is deeply biased against non-WASP ethnic groups, isn't the US at the forefront of abolishing racial discrimination in comparison ? Actively discussing racial issues might make the US appear to have more racism; but the truth might be that the US has been dealing with the problem and is working on the unsolved remainders of it whereas some other country that might seem quiet on racism might be very racist in reality, just never discussing it because the problem is never challenged. (Try the search function on the top menu bar with the keyword *discrimination* and you might find older discussions on it.)Jent said:Is racism as prevalent in other countries as it is here in the states ?
Bramicus said:On the other hand, countries that have very few racial or ethnic minorities may seem to have very little racism because there is very little opportunity for conflict -- precisely because there is such little mixing of ethnicities. When there is little occasion for people to discuss or even deal with their xenophobic feelings, there is no conflict and therefore the people of those countries can consider themselves quite "enlightened" and look down their noses at countries where there is racial conflict. These countries may have very little of that second component, because there is little mixing of ethnicities and therefore little occasion for conflict or anger, yet the first component -- innate feelings of superiority or inferiority assigned to race or ethnicity -- may be the strongest there. And as we have seen, once these countries start accruing sizable "immigrant" communities of different racial and/or ethnic backgrounds, they suddenly discover that enlightenment can be much easier in theory than in practice.
Lexico said:...whereas some other country that might seem quiet on racism might be very racist in reality, just never discussing it because the problem is never challenged.
You lost me here, Jent. There are some basic assumptions not stated which you assume that I know, but I really don't. What do you mean by your concluding question ? Given thatJent said:I can see where that might explain some things about how racist it seems that Americans are. I never really hear about it in other countries, but like you said, it's just doesn't really come up there.
So then, Japanese really aren't racist towards gaijin, it's more of a prejudice?
Your two definitions are in close parallel to Merriam-Webster's definitions in paraphrase;Bramicus said:It's not accurate to call America a racist country, but it really depends on what you mean by the word racism. Racism actually has two components. The first is the feeling or belief that people of different ethnicities have innate differences (B1). The second is the actual dislike, anger, and conflict that occurs when different ethnicities clash (B2).
Although 'racism' is defined at an EAS scale of 2 (classical) or 3 (scientific), and certain parts of US society may have achieved level 4 (nominal) on the EAS scale, certain parts of it may still be dwelling on level 1 (potential) or 2-3 (classical-scientific).America, precisely because it comprises hundreds of different cultures and dozens of different ethnicities, is probably the country in the entire world where the first component of racism, the feeling of any innate difference, is the least. By that measure, Americans are the least racist, because they are the most likely to consider people of different ethnicities equal because they're the most used to dealing with them on a daily basis. Americans may be more vocal and express their opinions if they think there are differences, but that is a different matter.
Non-US countries without many foreign peoples where racism may not be a widely debated topic may very well fall on the EAS scale 0. (absence) or 1. (potential) and might very easily fall into racism at level 2. (classical)-3. (scientific) on the EAS scale when little or biased understanding takes root. As Bramicus points out, such a country may conceive itself as non-racist due to no or little ethnic contact. But such a country may be only waiting for a variety of racism of EAS scale 2. (classical)-3. (scientific) to emerge if ethnic knowledge and education are not provided. In conclusion, Japan, with only a dash of foreign population, may very well be considered either without much ethnic perception/potentially racist (scale 0-1) or classical racist (scale 2). The same could go for many countries with categorically similar ethnic composition with little ethnic awareness/education.On the other hand, countries that have very few racial or ethnic minorities may seem to have very little racism because there is very little opportunity for conflict -- precisely because there is such little mixing of ethnicities. When there is little occasion for people to discuss or even deal with their xenophobic feelings, there is no conflict and therefore the people of those countries can consider themselves quite "enlightened" and look down their noses at countries where there is racial conflict. These countries may have very little of that second component because there is little mixing of ethnicities and therefore little occasion for conflict or anger, yet the first component -- innate feelings of superiority or inferiority assigned to race or ethnicity -- may be the strongest there. And as we have seen, once these countries start accruing sizable "immigrant" communities of different racial and/or ethnic backgrounds, they suddenly discover that enlightenment can be much easier in theory than in practice.
Jent said:The question I really want to ask, is, is racism as prevalent in other countries as it is here in the states?
Silverbackman said:Hmmm I am a bit offended by this statement. Are you implying that Americans are racists? I have lived in both large towns and grew up in a small town, and let me tell you racism does not exist to the same extent that it might around the world. You want to see real racism go to Sudan, if you are a Black Christian in Sudan you will be targeted instantly by Arab Muslims. Or why not go to India, if your skin is too dark some people in favor of the caste system won't hire you because of it.
In any case, racism exists all over the world, sad but true. You can't say that Americans are any more racist as Europeans. As far as I have heard Japanese don't distinguish on looks but on nationality. I heard they are particularly racist toward Chinese because of the large amount of Chinese criminals in Japan.
Ma Cherie said:Racism in Japan, well I don't think racism is the right word for it. However, it seems to me that Japan is infamous for discrimintaing against foriengners. I don't know if this has answered your question. :?
Karani said:Also, think about the way japanese so-called "discriminate" in this way:For example, there is a bubble. Anyone or thing inside this bubble is considered clean. Anything outside would be dirty. That's probably why there are still "japanese only" signs in japan.
Mercedes said:Well, all I know is that some people in Japan don't quite like gaijin.
As for where I'm from, the USVI, a lot of people are blatantly racist against each other. It's almost like the people here want the cycle of racism to continue; they teach their children to hate people with certain skin colors. It's disgusting, but I suppose that's what happens when people live on an island.
Oh, it is. It's absolutely horrible. And, with all due respect to your father, I hope you defied his wishes.Jent said:That sounds pretty bad. I think my dad wanted me to be that way.