Split from this thread
http://www.mafamily.org/Statutory Rape Report.pdf
"In 1993, 1,572 births in California were to mothers 14 years old or younger."
http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/NewHist_E-4.XLS
Population of California, Jan 1 1993: 31,150,000
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html
California, 2000: 7.3% under 5, 27.3% under 18
I'll have to take a few liberties with the calculation - such as assuming
those '14 years or under' only go as far down as 12 and assuming the age
distribution is even between 5 years and 17 years old and the same in 2000
as it was in 1993
= 20% (5 to 17 inclusive)
~= 4.6% (12 to 14 inclusive)
~= 2.3% (12 to 14 inclusive and female)
= 716,450
= 23 girls from 12 to 14 pregnant out of every 10,000 in California in 1993.
One out of 10,000? Maybe. But this is the sort of thing you can check.Maciamo said:Err, no sorry, but where I come from this is extremely rare, like one person out of 10,000. I'd call them extreme cases...
http://www.mafamily.org/Statutory Rape Report.pdf
"In 1993, 1,572 births in California were to mothers 14 years old or younger."
http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/NewHist_E-4.XLS
Population of California, Jan 1 1993: 31,150,000
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html
California, 2000: 7.3% under 5, 27.3% under 18
I'll have to take a few liberties with the calculation - such as assuming
those '14 years or under' only go as far down as 12 and assuming the age
distribution is even between 5 years and 17 years old and the same in 2000
as it was in 1993
= 20% (5 to 17 inclusive)
~= 4.6% (12 to 14 inclusive)
~= 2.3% (12 to 14 inclusive and female)
= 716,450
= 23 girls from 12 to 14 pregnant out of every 10,000 in California in 1993.
Last edited by a moderator: