Help Oral comprehension problem

[huiarnviu]

1-first question
I have trouble understanding a part of a sentence with a word/structure that seems completely unexpected to me
the video is here:



The transcript of the very beginning for me is :
Hades no aniki to ha ie [the part i cannot identity] shinde morau
meikai san kyotou no chikara, misete morau ka

what do you hear for the [the part I cannot identify]
Thanks for your help

2-second question in this video



starting at 0:22, we have the following script
kono tenyuu-sei garuda no aiacos ga aite da
watashi ni ano yo no koushaku-suru tsumori ka

Did I get right the word koushaku as 講釈 ? because the translation says, "you plan to send me to the other world" while I understand "are you trying to lecture me about the other world" ... which is completely different

Thanks for your help!

 

[mdchachi]

The transcript of the very beginning for me is :
Hades no aniki to ha ie [the part i cannot identity] shinde morau
meikai san kyotou no chikara, misete morau ka

I hear Hadesama for the first word. For the unidentified part it sounds to me something like
tanmaru shingo or tanmade shingo or yattan maru sengo

Did I get right the word koushaku as 講釈 ? because the translation says, "you plan to send me to the other world" while I understand "are you trying to lecture me about the other world" ... which is completely different

This is my best guess.
watashi ni ano you no kousha-wo-suru tsumori ka

I'm really bad at this so probably all wrong.

 

[Majestic]

1. ハーデス様の兄貴とはいえ、貴様自身は単なる聖闘士。死んでもらう！
2. 私にあの世の講釈をするともりか？

1. I got from an online wiki kind of thing here PS2 ¹"¬Žm¯–î –»‰¤ƒn[ƒfƒX\"ñ‹{•Ò 'Ü'Æ'ß(‰¼). In your video the dialogue seems abbreviated, and is very hard to make out. Maybe the sound files were somehow compressed or corrupted. In the Japanese version, the whole line is included.
2. Couldn't verify with any online source, but it sounds like you have it right. It's not uncommon for western localizations to become slightly altered, as I'm sure you are aware. In this case the original Japanese could be faithfully translated into English, without any weird, unintended meaning coming in. So I don't know why they chose to make such a big change. Maybe they felt the original Japanese was too subtle. Anyway, I think you got it right.

 

[huiarnviu]

thank you for your answers, i will have many more of these oral comprehension quizz to submit so be prepared

 

[Majestic]

Typo: 2. 私にあの世の講釈をするつもりか？