"This is a big chance" is the main clause and the rest part is modifying 大チャンス.Working on amateur-translation.
「誰もが知ってる有名なアート作品を驚きの大特価で手に入れる、大チャンスですよ!」
My translation will definitely not be accurate but this is what I get when I try: "I procured famous works of art that everyone knows for surprisingly big bargain prices, this is a big chance!"
I highly recommend to delite his friend code.EDIT: Moreso than wanting that translated, I got a message from a Japanese friend on a 3DS forum, and would appreciate full comprehension on what he's saying!
「オレの周りに日本語話せるヤツは妹しかいないから、全然いいよw 上手いし
日本語最高だろw
よかったらフレンドコード交換しない?
どうぶつの森を買うなら、一緒にやりたいし
オレのは:****
Reiさんのをもう登録しました~」
Best guess for honyaku:
"Since the only one in my area who can speak Japanese is my little sister, [your Japanese is] totally fine, haha. Probably the best Japanese [I've heard] haha.
If it's all right will you share your friend code? If you buy Animal Crossing, I want to play together. Mine is: **** I've already registered yours!"
That's not みち but どう, as in 柔道, 剣道, 茶道, 花道... Your understanding regarding the concept of どう is correct, though.Thanks. I wasn't sure if it was this summarizing つまり or not because the expression following it was unknown to me. So I didn't exclude the possibility of a つまり道 noun for this reason, until I recieved clarification. This is the entire text. I've been trying to figure out what 道 represents based on the information in it, but I am no wiser still. Only thing I can think of is that it's maybe something related to forward movement and development, or a continuous cultural journey because of self improvement, and this is why the word 道 is used to describe a culture which actively supports this process.
~しかいない: there is no one/nothing other than~Thank you Toritoribe!If I may ask, in that sentence, what exactly is 「しかいない」? I used logical inference to construct the honyaku but I'm not sure what shikainai is. Otherwise, thank you!
That's a question to the speaker themselves, so the former interpretation is correct. There indeed is no だろう or か, but it's the same as 何がいけなかった? 何がいけなかったのだ has more strong nuance than 何がいけなかったのだろう or 何がいけなかったのか, with implying anger or regret.There's a sentence in this text which eludes me.
地下より吹き出した溶岩は野原を焼きつくし、我々はその中で逃げ惑った。
何がいけなかったのだ。恵み多き国の光は突然閉ざされ、混乱の中で闇が世界を支配した。
Possibly I'm completely off on this one but reading it in the context of someone recounting for the events of a great disaster, I can speculate. There is no だろう or か etc so I don't read it as a question, but either it must be a question like roughly "what was wrong/bad?" ("why on earth have we deserved this?", or possibly "what was the forbidden action we took to cause this?") or the 何 must have a negative meaning and it turns into something like "everything was wrong" but this should require a も particle I think.
新たなる is a classical way of saying 新しい. That 's not 新たになる.As for this sentence, is it a way of saying " for the new light of hope" or is it " for the light of hope (which comes/becomes) anew" or "for the light of the hope which comes anew" or "for the light of new hope"?
新たなる希望の光のために。
I don't know why there is no うまく in 何がいけなかった but anyway, everything goes wrong would be 何もかも上手く行かない or somesuch. What went wrong you can also say like 何がダメだったの?Thanks. Now it makes sense.
There's a sentence in this text which eludes me.
地下より吹き出した溶岩は野原を焼きつくし、我々はその中で逃げ惑った。
何がいけなかったのだ。恵み多き国の光は突然閉ざされ、混乱の中で闇が世界を支配した。
Possibly I'm completely off on this one but reading it in the context of someone recounting for the events of a great disaster, I can speculate. There is no だろう or か etc so I don't read it as a question, but either it must be a question like roughly "what was wrong/bad?" ("why on earth have we deserved this?", or possibly "what was the forbidden action we took to cause this?") or the 何 must have a negative meaning and it turns into something like "everything was wrong" but this should require a も particle I think.
の・んだ is used to mark an explanation, or to ask for one in question form so with a shift in intonation the speaker can also use the power of this grammar to elicit an explanation within a question。"Why" or "what" questions are often asked with the expression to implicitly press for a deeper understanding or background information or to invite explanations and further clarifications, although in everyday life obviously not necessarily under the emotionally extreme or trying circumstances you describe. This structure in turn becomes convenient to respond to a question without being too direct in your remarks ( "The explanation is that ~; The reason is that ~; The fact is that ~; It is that ~" etc)Thanks for the replies. So the のだ part in the question becomes basically like "questioning in anger/disbelief/shock/affection" more than だろう which is more thoughtful or inquisitive and か which can be both equivalent to a mumbling "huh" and like a straight out question?
Also, sorry for the editing, I guess people like me are the reason some forums have time limit on editing.
I don't know why there is no うまく in 何がいけなかった but anyway, everything goes wrong would be 何もかも上手く行かない or somesuch. What went wrong you can also say like 何がダメだったの?
Yes, that's right.Thanks for the replies. So the のだ part in the question becomes basically like "questioning in anger/disbelief/shock/affection" more than だろう which is more thoughtful or inquisitive and か which can be both equivalent to a mumbling "huh" and like a straight out question?
No problem. I, too, often do the same thing.Also, sorry for the editing, I guess people like me are the reason some forums have time limit on editing.
何と言うか means "how should I express it" or something along the line. It's actually saying おまえらしい with implying being amazed.Sorry for double post but this came up in my collection of things I don't understand. Thought that it's best to ask about it before I forget.
こういうことに疎いのは おまえらしいと言うか何と言うか・・・
This と言うか何と言うか part is unfamiliar to me. I know just と言うか can be like "or should I say..." when rephrasing something but this sentence with two と言うか separated by a 何 puzzles me.
あの嵐の結界を越えたことにしても/あの嵐の結界を越えたことだって/あの嵐の結界を越えたことも、Here's one more question.
About the ことにしたって in this text. Is the って like とは rather than という in this case? Maybe the sentence has another nuance altogether from how I read it, but I tend to interpret it as "It can't be said to be anything but a miracle that you decided to (and managed to) cross that barrier of storms". If not this meaning, then にしたって should have an entirely different meaning here.
あの嵐の結界を越えたことにしたって、
奇蹟としか言いようがないもんな。
いいよ、君に悪いから「きょうデパートに行って買ってきてあげる」
「いいよ、悪いから」
「いいの、ついでがあるから」
Today I'll go to the market and buy you something on the way.
That's good. Because it is bad.
That's ok. Because I have something to do too.
Can 悪いから be translated to ''is it unconvenient?'' or something like that. I don't understand what it means.
Yeah, that's exactly why I added ことだって and ことも.あの嵐の結界を越えたことにしても/あの嵐の結界を越えたことだって/あの嵐の結界を越えたことも、
This is helpful.My first inclination for "fact that....also" would have been ことも、 as derived from ことは although だって is obvious in retrospect. But the use of にしても to me conveys the entire situation expressed by the whole sentence is still a a hypothetical situation as a condition for the clause (even if you had crossed...).
1)
大きゅう is the u-euphonic change(ウ音便) of 大きく.
e.g.
高い takai --> たかく takaku --> たこう takou/takō
甘い amai --> あまく amaku --> あもう amou/amō
大きい ookii --> おおきく ookiku --> おおきゅう ookyuu/ookyū
優しい yasashii --> やさしく yasashiku --> やさしゅう yasashuu(yasasyuu)/yasahū(yasasyū)
熱い atsui --> あつく atsuku --> あつう atsuu/atsū
重い omoi --> おもく omoku --> おもう omou/omō
And yes for "only i-adjectives". でございます is used for na-adjectives(e.g. 静かでございます).
2)
ない vs ないで
3)
The form differs between godan verbs and ichidan verbs/irregular verbs.
Japanese verb conjugation
~するようになるI'm trying to translate an ad that pops up on this forum for me.
自然な英文を書けるようになりたい人のための学習サイト
'A learning site for people who want to be able to write natural-sounding English' is what I find. What does ように do?
The answer is in the wiki page I linked in my previous post.thanks for the answer..
just on the 3rd part...
what i mean is the combination of causitive and passive, when you use it do you usually use
the shortened form or what's casually used by locals???
like for example --> 買わせられる vs 買わされる
which between the two would a local prefer using?? the shorter one or the longer form?
There is NO i-adjective that ends with -ei. That's the reason.I just realized this just now...
is there an i-adjective that ends in "ei"
like kirei(i know this one is a na-adj but just for example)
and if there is how will it be conjugated in i-adj + gozaimasu???
this question might sounds silly, but just in case there is...
because I only know a handful of Japanese adjectives (hope you understand my situation)
It's not surprised that おぼつく isn't in dictionaries, since it desn't exist. It's mistakenly made from おぼつかない. Here's an explanation.Here is a verb I read as おぼつく and can't identify or find in a dictionary. Chances are I might have misspelled it when transcribing the text. From context I'm guessing it must have a meaning similar to "get close to", "touch at", "return", "reach" or something, but the exact meaning is not known to me. The こともできはしない part to me gives a feeling that not even a fraction of what desired can be achieved, like it's "impossible" etc.
いかに我々が刻をかけ、再興を成し遂げようとしても、かつての繁栄におぼつくこともできはしないだろう。
おぼつくとは - 日本語表現辞典 Weblio辞書おぼつく
誤って「おぼつかない」の原型と考えられている表現。「おぼつかない」は「おぼつかない」で一つの形容詞を成す。
That's an irregular use of 刻, which is from the meaning below.As for the 刻をかけ part, is it an older way of saying "spending/investing time"? The 刻 refers to a time unit? I found nothing about this noun+verb combination as a fixed expression either, but I learned 刻 once could refer to time so from that I came to this conclusion. If not time, does it refer to effort?
刻(こく)の意味 - goo国語辞書こく【刻】
㋒一昼夜を12等分した一。午前零時を子(ね)の刻とし、以下順次丑(うし)の刻、寅(とら)の刻のように十二支に配する。時(とき)ともいう。1刻をさらに四つに分け、丑三つなどといい、また、1刻を上・中・下に3分し、寅の上刻、寅の下刻などの言い方をする。