lemonworld
後輩
- 7 Nov 2011
- 11
- 1
ディスクだけが買いたいです。それから、3000円で送りつけりますか。ありがとうございました。I'm planning to order some DVD from Yahoo Auction, but it comes with a big box. I want to ask the seller if he can just sell me the disc without the box and shipping. How do I ask? "I want to disc only. Can you do 3000 yen including shipping? Thanks."
I'm planning to order some DVD from Yahoo Auction, but it comes with a big box. I want to ask the seller if he can just sell me the disc without the box and shipping. How do I ask? "I want to disc only. Can you do 3000 yen including shipping? Thanks."
First of all, Yahoo Auction Japan page always has an information whether the seller can ship it or not. How about your seller's? (I suppose most sellers don't accept the order from outside of Japan.)I'm planning to order some DVD from Yahoo Auction, but it comes with a big box. I want to ask the seller if he can just sell me the disc without the box and shipping. How do I ask? "I want to disc only. Can you do 3000 yen including shipping? Thanks."
I know. My friend is Japan is buying it for me.
Isn't that 聞いただけでうは(without は right after で)?
"うはwww頭いかれてんじゃないのwww" is a quotation.
聞いただけで「うはwww頭いかれてんじゃないのwww」と言いたくなるような modifies 事柄
It is him to pull off such things ~ seriously. = He can pull off such things ~ seriously.
Hmm, yeah, I think so. 聞いただけでは doesn't fit the context.The は right after the で is in the original text, it could be a typo?
Right.The "www" are like the Japanese version of "lol" right?
Hmm, yeah, I think so. 聞いただけでは doesn't fit the context.
The subjects of 聞いた and 言いたくなる are "people/one", and the object of 聞いた is 事柄.
それを聞いただけで、人が「うはwww・・・」と言いたくなるような事柄を・・・
He can seriously pull off such things that one will want to say "Ha, you must be crazy!" just hearing that(= such things).
Right.
I would be very glad if someone could help with a translation of the sentence:
"The old man could not cross the dried out lake."
It's for a homework, but it seems as if I bit off a little more than I can chew.
Yea, I came up with a similar sentence. I'm just not sure if it expresses the impossibility of crossing the lake, or if it only says that "he did not cross the lake". But thanks a lot for your input!I'd wait for someone more experienced to chime in but I want to take a very basic shot at it:
じいさんは乾燥した湖を渡れなかった。I'm sure there's more to it than that, though.
Yea, I came up with a similar sentence. I'm just not sure if it expresses the impossibility of crossing the lake, or if it only says that "he did not cross the lake". But thanks a lot for your input!
I'm not sure since I'm not familiar with that verb-form. I searched around a little more though and found something about the help verb かねる that supposedly expresses the impossibility of performing an action. The sentence would then be something like おじいさんは乾燥した湖を渡りかねなかった。Do you think 渡れてしまいませんでした could work, to express a regret that he couldn't cross/an absolute fact that he couldn't cross the lake and that's that?
I'm not sure since I'm not familiar with that verb-form. I searched around a little more though and found something about the help verb かねる that supposedly expresses the impossibility of performing an action. The sentence would then be something like おじいさんは乾燥した湖を渡りかねなかった。
You have a point, I'll have to take all the alternatives in to consideration.Yea, there's more than one layer to it, whereas you could plainly state as a fact that he couldn't cross the lake or you could add a little more emotion or strength to it. As far as I can see, there's not any problems with おじいさんは乾燥した湖を渡れなかった/渡れていませんでした。