It's not categorized in adverbs in Japanese grammar. It's just a conjugation of adjectives; the adverbial form or the adverbial usage of a form(中立形, ク形). But, it's reasonable to think of the form as an adverb in English, as in your translations.Does using an adjective to modify a verb turn it into an adverb?
As in 静かな部屋で静かに過ごす=> "I spend time quietly/peacefully in a quiet room"?
静かに would be quietly/peacefully?
And 速い車で速く走る => "I travel quickly in a fast car"?
速く = quickly?
How would one say:
Thank you for never failing to make me smile.
The auxiliary verb in general linguistics is almost equivalent to 補助動詞 in Japanese grammar. One of the definitions of 補助動詞 is that the verb follows the -te form of a verb.Could either of you direct me toward a resource that would inform me more of auxiliary verbs?
I feel like that would be too much to cover here...
Yeah, I think that's pretty good.I'm going to try this as no one has answer it yet... but tell me if I'm wrong!:?
いつも私に微笑ませてくれてありがとう。
This is more like... Thank you for always making me smile. (I think.)
I feel like this would make more sense ~.~
いつも私に微笑(み)くれてありがとう. Does this always mean the other person is smiling ?Yeah, I think that's pretty good.:emoji_thumbsupいつも私を微笑ませてくれてありがとう would be more natural, though. :emoji_wink:
The literal translation 微笑ませることを失敗しないでくれてありがとう/失敗することなく私を微笑ませてくれてありがとう sounds too much literal.(The latter one is more likely "Thank you for always making me smile without failing".)
Kiyo90,
Without fail in the sense of never missing or consistently practiced is more naturally "kanarazu" or "kitto" /itsumo etc.
いつも私に微笑(み)くれてありがとう. Does this always mean the other person is smiling ?
Are these the correct kanji for each:
必ず?
屹度?
Kiyo90;675350 said:What is the difference between the two?
Is 必ず more definitely/confident sounding than 屹度?
Kiyo90;675350 said:Also, for いつも、it can mean never or always, right? I'm slightly confused on this point.
So:
いつも私にいてくれる。(You) are always (here) for me.
いつも私にいてくれない。 (You) are never (here) for me.
Is that correct?
いつも私に微笑(み)をくれて/微笑んでくれてありがとういつも私に微笑(み)くれてありがとう. Does this always mean the other person is smiling ?
In addition, きっと can't be used for unchanging truth, on the other hand, 必ず is hardly used for guess.Are these the correct kanji for each:
必ず?
屹度?
What is the difference between the two?
Is 必ず more definitely/confident sounding than 屹度?
[用法] かならず・きっと――「この薬を飲めば必ず(きっと)病気が治る」「勉強すれば必ず(きっと)合格する」など、両語とも可能性の強い状態を表すが、「必ず」のほうが確率的により高い場合に使う。◇両語とも「この借りは必ず(きっと)返す」のように決意を表す語としても用いられる。◇「三に二をかけると必ず六になる」「太陽は必ず東から昇る」など、不変の真理を表す場合には「きっと」は使わない。逆に「彼はきっと帰ったんだろう」など、推量の気持ちの強いときには、「必ず」は使わない。
いつも私のそばにいてくれる/いつも私のそばにいてくれない can be alternatives to 私と.Also, for いつも、it can mean never or always, right? I'm slightly confused on this point.
So:
いつも私にいてくれる。(You) are always (here) for me.
いつも私にいてくれない。 (You) are never (here) for me.
Is that correct?
I bet it's 刺激 or "stimulus".Alright so, I'm reading this comic that's has some dialogue about tattoos, but it's hand written, so it's hard to read.
日本の古いじじいには__激が強いですね
I'm not sure about the kanji where the blank is, but it looks like it could be either 溂 or 渕.
When I looked it up there wasn't any word for 溂激 or 渕激
Anyone have any idea as to what it might be? Any thoughts are helpful.
I bet it's ナスhナ槌 or "stimulus".;-)
I tried to attach a picture.I think we may need to see a scan of it to be sure, but I thought the same thing Toritoribe did upon reading your initial post.
@Glenn:@sl89
It does look a lot like 刺 with シ, but that character doesn't seem to exist. I don't know.
@Kiyo
と is like "with". It's reciprocal, whereas に is more like "to", and is just one direction.
@sl89
For the kanji on the left hand side...
住、伴、作、任、件。。。These are the closest (of the 220+ that I looked at with that radical) that I found that looks like the image... but all of them aren't the one in the image. I can't figure out what the scribbles in that sentence are suppose to be, so couldn't attempt to translate the sentence to see which one of them makes the most sense.
That person needs better handwriting >.>
OK, that makes sense. I know the giver is "you" because of 私に and くれて but there are times that "make me/force me" overlaps with "give me" - at least in colloquial English.いつも私に微笑(み)をくれて/微笑んでくれてありがとう
The giver is "you" because of 私に and くれて.
いつも私に微笑ませてくれてありがとう is not incorrect. This expression focuses more on the causee or "私", i.e., it has a nuance that 私 is the doer(smiler). Whereas 私を is more on the causer "you" or the fact that you make me smile; "I have an appreciation to あなたが私を微笑ませてくれること". This would be more suitable to the contect, I suppose.
@Glenn:
Hmmm... so the sentence with be more like... "You're always here with me"?
What do you mean by reciprocal? That the verb taking on that particle is reciprocal?
I mean, I get the basic usage of the two... but a lot of times, in certain examples, they don't make sense to me.
日本のタトゥーイメージって良くないですね。体に傷もつきますしねえ。
That's the part outside the bubble. I still can't figure out what's before the 激, though. We may need some Japanese eyes on that one.
By the way, I found 溂 ( ラツ) via a Chinese dictionary, so I knew it existed (although it said the meaning was yet to be determined...), but that's not what the character before 激 looks to be. It looks like 刺 with シ, which is different from 束+刀 with シ.
日本のタトゥーイメージって良くないですね。体に傷もつきますしねえ。
That's the part outside the bubble. I still can't figure out what's before the 激, though. We may need some Japanese eyes on that one.
By the way, I found 溂 ( ラツ) via a Chinese dictionary, so I knew it existed (although it said the meaning was yet to be determined...), but that's not what the character before 激 looks to be. It looks like 刺 with シ, which is different from 束+刀 with シ.