Apple Bomb
先輩
- 8 Mar 2004
- 46
- 1
亡くなってしまった may be for especially tragic cases or someone that has put up a courageous but ultimately unrewarded fight for life. From what I understand, the feeling is not that much different than the regular usage just that it may not be appropriate for certain situations.I would guess the same about adding しまった. Probably I think too much about this stuff sometimes (isn't it unfortunate when most people die? Does leaving out that suffix imply you don't care? etc.)
http://appsv.main.teikyo-u.ac.jp/tosho/mkimura23.pdf昨年段階ですでに気づいていたが、近頃とみに「亡くなる」ということばが多用されている。昨年ではまだ「死亡した」ということばも使われていたが、今年は「死亡した」という言葉を聴くと「アレッ」と思うほどである。私自身は「亡くなる」は「死ぬ」の尊敬語だと思っていたので、何でもかんでも「亡くなる」というのはおかしいと思っていた。特に、身内が死んだときに「亡くなる」を使うことには、ずっと以前から違和感を抱いていたが、老若男女の別なく、現在は「亡くなる」が使われている。
「死ぬ」ではあまりにも直接的で何とかやわらかく婉曲に言いたい気持ちがあって、ていねい語のつもりで「亡くなる」を使うのだろうが、どんな対象に対しても無差別に使うことは、私には耐えられない。たとえば、本年7 月に聞いた例に「(犬の)クロが悪性腫瘍のために亡くなりました」がある。犬にわざわざ「亡くなる」と言うことはないと思う。また小学生の子供が東京大空襲のビデオを見せられた後「(あんなふうに)自分が亡くなったらいやだと思った」といっていたが、子どもが、自分が死ぬことを「自分が亡くなる」ということに違和感を覚えないか。多くの言葉には同じ意味を持つ複数の言葉があるが、「死ぬ」に相当するやまとことばは思いつかない(輸入された中国語である漢字の熟語には、死亡、死去、逝去、他界、鬼籍に入る、薨去、崩御等がある)。このことが「亡くなる」の多用につながってると考える。そういえば、2 ~ 3 年前に新聞の広告に某タレントとそのペットの話が出ていたが、そのペットの経歴が最後に「~年~月、逝去」と出ていたので、新聞社に抗議した記憶がある。しかし、漱石が「我輩は猫である」のモデルの猫が死んだとき、友だちにあてた死亡通知に「逝去」と書いてあることから、猫には「逝去」を使ってもよいのだろうか。
岩波国語辞典によると「亡くなる」は「死ぬ」の婉曲表現とあり、新明解国語辞典でも「死ぬ」の婉曲表現で例文として「親が亡くなる」と書いてある。新潮国語辞典の例文にはすでに古今集で「親が亡くなる」との例文が出ている(とすると、昔から親が死んだときでも「亡くなる」が使われていたなら、私が考えていた「亡くなる」は尊敬語というのは間違いということになる)。そこで、誰かが「死ぬ」ではあまりにもむきつけすぎるので、丁寧にいうつもりでだれかれかまわず「亡くなる」といったところ、人々が早速それにとびついて使い始め、あっという間に(この一年で)広まったと考えられる。
FYI, a passage from Mitsuko Kimura's 最近気になる日本語:
http://appsv.main.teikyo-u.ac.jp/tosho/mkimura23.pdf
I agree. I hate it when people use Japanese incorrectly. I hate it even more that they don't realize it.Thank you for quoting the interesting article!
I think the same goes with あげる/やる to pets or one's own children...
Hear, hear! Can't agree with you more!!I agree. I hate it when people use Japanese incorrectly. I hate it even more that they don't realize it.
Another one that makes me want to strangle people is
おられる。
I understand what the person is trying to say, but there is a word in the language for that: いらっしゃる. If you don't like that, there's おいでになる.
The worst thing is that these people think that they're being polite, but you if you say that a dog 逝去s on the same level that you do to be polite to a person, you are calling people dogs. How is that polite?
(sorry for the short rant)
It's a really interesting phenomenon. I try to resist using あげる for anyone's kids, but it can't even really be called 'incorrect usage' anymore. More a change in the language that has made it firmly established as a woman's word over a period of like fifty or sixty years. ☝I think the same goes with あげる/やる to pets or one's own children...
Elizabeth,It's a really interesting phenomenon. I try to resist using あげる for anyone's kids, but it can't even really be called 'incorrect usage' anymore. More a change in the language that has made it firmly established as a woman's word over a period of like fifty or sixty years. ☝
Oh, OK I hadn't realize that distinction previously. This was the 1989 textbook definition I was going by:Elizabeth,
undrentide said it in reference to "one's own" pet or children. I would use "ageru" to children of others, too, but not in reference of my own.
Another one that makes me want to strangle people is
おられる
頭を合わせずソッポを向いたまま、もちろん握手もなしに初めざるをえなかったインタヴューは、最初の30分間はただ質問を揶揄されるのみ
I think it's most likely a mistake for 顔を合わせず, which is basically the same thing anyway saying "Without looking me in the face (meeting face to face) they turned away from me....""The interview, which I had to start with their backs turned to me, not having made eye contact, and of course without having shaken hands, was nothing but having my questions ridiculed for the first 30 minutes."
Not sure exactly what 頭を合わせる means here, so I took at stab at it with "make eye contact." Of course, the translation is sloppy, but it should give you something to work with at any rate.
Yeah, I know you weren't sure about the phrase, what I was trying to say was that I'm not sure 頭を合わせる is legitimate to begin with. At least it hasn't come up in anything I've been able to search or the native speakers I've been able to ask about it.Er... that is what it is in the original. I just used the base form to show it was the phrase I wasn't sure about, not the conjugation.
"頭を合わせずソッポを向いたまま、もちろん握手もなし に初めざるをえなかったインタヴューは、最初の30分間はただ質問を揶揄されるのみ.
"頭を合わせずソッポを向いたまま、もちろん握手もなし に初めざるをえなかったインタヴューは、最初の30分間はただ質問を揶揄されるのみ。" This should read like this, "顔を合わせずソッポを向いたまま、もちろん握手もなし に始めざるをえなかったインタヴューは、最初の30分間はただ質問を揶揄されるのみ。""The interview, which I had to start with their backs turned to me, not having made eye contact, and of course without having shaken hands, was nothing but having my questions ridiculed for the first 30 minutes."
Not sure exactly what 頭を合わせる means here, so I took at stab at it with "make eye contact." Of course, the translation is sloppy, but it should give you something to work with at any rate.
Interesting article, however I don't find it to be a good resemblance of how society is currently thinking in regards to this. Just my opinion.FYI, a passage from Mitsuko Kimura's 近頃気になる日本語:
http://appsv.main.teikyo-u.ac.jp/tosho/mkimura23.pdf
"頭を合わせずソッポを向いたまま、もちろん握手もなし に初めざるをえなかったインタヴューは、最初の30分間はただ質問を揶揄されるのみ。" This should read like this, "顔を合わせずソッポを向いたまま、もちろん握手もなし に始めざるをえなかったインタヴューは、最初の30分間はただ質問を揶揄されるのみ。"
"初め" should have been "始め".
I was going to ask on the times being referred to, also. Like with あげる、 the language has become 丁寧すぎる (too soft and 'nonoffensive') to the point that what used to be standard cannot be dealt with normally so is naturally perceived as 乱暴すぎる (excessively harsh and unseemly)。Interesting article, however I don't find it to be a good resemblance of how society is currently thinking in regards to this. Just my oppinion.
Hello everybody, just a quick question.. recently I've been hearing people saying ひょとして a lot.. especially in anime. Does it have the same meaning as "まさか" or such?
Searched google for "hyotoshite", only one result, but "ひょとして" gets heaps more results.. Does anybody know?
Thanks
In what regards is this used?At the moment there are a whole heap of possibilities that could be thought of, please elaborate.Takuminotsubasa
Can someone change that into Kanji. Please and thanks