Glenn;399757 said:
Ah, so it can't be the speaker saying it? I had initially thought that, but then it seemed like the speaker could be saying it. For instance, if the conversation leading up to this point was some sort of misunderstanding, could the speaker say ๆฉไผใใใใใพใใใใพใๆใใฆใใใ ใใใใจ็ณใใฆใใใพใ ("what I'm saying is that I'd like for you to teach me again if I have the opportunity.") to clear up the misunderstanding?
No, because ็ณใใฆใใใพใ is only used to quote someone else's speech.
If the speaker is talking about himself (i.e. his own wish, opinion), then he should say:
ๆฉไผใใใใใพใใใใพใๆใใฆใใใ ใใชใใงใใใใใ
ๆฉไผใใใใใพใใใใพใๆใใฆใใใ ใใใใจๆใใพใใ
ๆฉไผใใใใใพใใใใพใๆใใฆใใใ ใใๅญใใพใใ
Glenn;399757 said:
Also, I'm assuming it's the speaker's in-group's ๆฉไผ in this instance, due to the lack of ใ and the verb ใใใใพใ (i.e., if it were the listener it would be ใๆฉไผใใใใใซใชใใพใใใ, right?).
I think ใใใใพใ here is just a polite form of ใใ.
The subject of the verb ใใ is ๆฉไผ, not the person or something that belongs to the person, so if I were to mention the opportunity for the listener, I would say either
ๆฉไผใใใใพใใใ
or
ๆฉไผใใใใใพใใใ
because to use honorific sounds very strange to me...
(And somehow ๆฉไผ is just there, does not belong to anyone.)
It would be different with the word ๆ้, though, as it is very close to "to have". Then when I want to be very polite, I'd say either
ๆ้ใใใใใพใใใ
(to refer my time)
ใๆ้ใใใใใงใใใ
(to refer the listener's time)
The more I think about it, the more complicated I realize it is!
That is ๆฌ่ช...
The above is just my idea, so other member may have different opinion.