undrentide
Japa'n vagyok
- 18 Jan 2006
- 3,652
- 310
yorkii said:where did you hear あばよ?
One might say it when leaving the scene in bad mood.
Yes, "te" forms can also indicate the means by which an action or operation was executed. Nicely fitting the pattern I'm sure you already know of phrases like 車に乗っていきます。(Go by car) or 建築家によって設計された (designed by an architect) once you stop and consider it. ☝Fuumei said:"Gurin(green: as in a golf area) wa suna(sand) to sekiyu(oil) o katamete tsukurimasu"
I'm curious as to the usage of "tsukurimasu" here. Does this mean "made by hardening"? I see it as "hardens and is made", but that is definitely not the proper way to see it. Does "tsukurimasu" have another usage like "iku"? as in ex: "umai iku" or "susunde iku".
KrazyKat said:こんにちは みなさん。
今日の問題はこれです。 たまには「しょうがない」をどう訳すればいいか分かりません。
たとえば:
おじいさんは、怖くてしょうがなかったが、楽しげなお囃子に合わせて体を動かしているうち、だんだん調子が出てきました。
この「なになにしてしょうがいない」の句の意味がしっかり掴めないのでしょう。
よろしくお願いします。
Elizabeth said:Yes, "te" forms can also indicate the means by which an action or operation was executed. Nicely fitting the pattern I'm sure you already know of phrases like 車に乗っていきます。(Go by car) or 建築家によって設計された (designed by an architect) once you stop and consider it. ☝
Unless there is some unwritten context, I would read the first sentence about overtime not being ordered from the company side as saying that the company is not to blame....Whether the 担当者 changed the scheduling doesn't seem to be the fault of the company. ☝KrazyKat said:Thanks Elizabeth.
Now for today's problem.
「一昨日の新聞で読んだけど、運転手が過労運転になったのは本人が悪いからだなんていってるそうじゃないか」
(略)
「超過勤務を会社側から命じていたわけではないと、強制していたわけではないといったわけです。特に梶川運転手のほうは、タイムチャートを作る担当者に、自分の乗務を増やしてもらうように頼んでいたという事実があります」
「本当かな (略) 休まないで働きたいと思う人間なんかいるかなあ」
「いえ、 本当です」
Now, from the context it seems that the speaker is trying to say that the company that the driver worked for was at fault, but that sentence seems to say to me that they are saying that the driver was at fault. (A bus drove off a cliff because the driver was overtired) What am I missing?
It is hinted by the words なんて, which implies the speaker's negative feeling - scorn, distrust, etc.KrazyKat said:Ah, so it definately seems that I have a problem understanding this sentence.
運転手が過労運転になったのは本人が悪いからだなんていってるそうじゃ ないか
They(newspapers) say that it is the driver's own fault that he was driving when overtired, isn't that right?
I don't see how this implies that the company was forcing him to work too much. Which part am I misunderstanding?
undrentide said:It is hinted by the words なんて, which implies the speaker's negative feeling - scorn, distrust, etc.
Together with the words showing cross-examination ないか, one feels that the speaker is trying to say "of course what the papers are saying is wrong".
I think the lawyer is just practicing rhetoric, since an open accusation that the driver is at fault may result in the statement being used against the company at court. He probably is saying the article was misleading in that the company is "not necessarily accusing the driver" of the accident.KrazyKat said:Ah, so the actual article in the paper sides with the tranpost company, not the person making those remarks.
However, then there is one more part that I'm not quite sure on. The lawyer defending the company says this:
先日の新聞報道について少し誤解されている意見が出ましたので
So they are saying here that although the article was correct, it is being misunderstood by this person. However if they are disagreeing with the newspaper, isn't that different from misunderstanding. I'm confused. :?
Besides undrentide's keywords like "nante" and "naika," overlooked by me as wellKrazyKat said:Ah, so it definately seems that I have a problem understanding this sentence.
運転手が過労運転になったのは本人が悪いからだなんていってるそうじゃ ないか
They(newspapers) say that it is the driver's own fault that he was driving when overtired, isn't that right?
I don't see how this implies that the company was forcing him to work too much. Which part am I misunderstanding?
Thanks, KK, I suppose I start trying to examine each part when people ask me what the meaning of each word in itsu made mo is... when I realise I only know what the meaning of itsu mo and itsu made mo... is. Yes, I've read too that o-suffix is used more by women and children. Thanks again.KrazyKat said:osewani narimashita. Doesn't really translate very well into Englsih. Its kind of like saying thanks for all of the help that you gave me. I recommend just remembering the general intention behind teh phrase and when to use it, than worrying about what the exact meaning is.
making it into nattimasu only means that they are continuing to be recieving help/being indebeted.
There are less used o- (and go-) prefix words giving women a chance to express their femininity, like "oniku" or "osakana" (??) although most are everyday and unisex for traditionally 'unclean' categories of things (food (gohan, onaka), drink (ocha, osake), money (okane), bathroom (otoire)...yukio_michael said:Thanks, KK, I suppose I start trying to examine each part when people ask me what the meaning of each word in itsu made mo is... when I realise I only know what the meaning of itsu mo and itsu made mo... is. Yes, I've read too that o-suffix is used more by women and children. Thanks again.
So if I wanted to be brief, and round out the informality of dropping the subject particle, I could say, otoire doko desu ka!?... can you save rough sounding speech w/ a bit of honorifics?Elizabeth said:There are less used o- (and go-) prefix words giving women a chance to express their femininity, like "oniku" or "osakana" (??) although most are everyday and unisex for traditionally 'unclean' categories of things (food (gohan, onaka), drink (ocha, osake), money (okane), bathroom (otoire)...