A Japanese person would be able to understand the following string of Korean without any Korean knowledge for example if hanja is used. 會社에 電車로 通勤합니다
I don't think you should be doing this kind of reasoning: I'm as affected from the grammar the same way someone is when they are learning to speak Japanese. Instead, I should have less work to do because you need a major understanding of the rules to speak about something rather than to read about something in the same language (if a Japanese reader read 僕は生徒会長です, they will understand it as long as they know the words in it, and writing the same phrase would be easy, as long as you know the particle は. However, a much harder phrase wouldn't be as easy to write, but much easier to understand. One might understand 私はそれを食べるつもりはない as long as they know the words in it, which are all pretty basic, but might not be able to build the phrase from simple recalling of the rules. Heck, the first phrase is most likely understandable even without knowing what は means).Im afraid you're going to feel overwhelmed easily with that method, even if you break the kanji barrier, grammar will put you on your knees
Ah, re-reading the OP I realized I must have given the wrong idea. Of course I mean to study words which aren't written with a kanji and learn how to conjugate.Looking only at the individual words and ignoring the grammar that connects them won't get you very far. Take this: もう母さんに納豆を食べさせられたくない. With your method, you might conclude that 母さん is (or is not) eating 納豆, but nothing is further from the truth.
会社に電車で通勤する
会社に電車で通勤しない
会社に電車で通勤できる
会社に電車で通勤できない
会社に電車で通勤したい
会社に電車で通勤したくない
etc etc etc
Not sure what your point is Mike. Knowing you have zero knowledge in the other Asian languages, not sure if you know what u r on about.
I forgot that native Japanese speakers all learn Hangul. How silly of me.
Oh, I see. Thanks for the explanation.Nope
食べる -> to eat
食べさせる -> causative, "to make someone eat" (or "to let someone eat" depending on the context)
食べさせられる -> passive causative, "to be made to eat by someone". The "someone" is marked by に in passive sentences (like the "by" in English).
食べさせられたい -> <verb stem>たい form of the above, "wanting to be made to eat"
食べさせられたくない -> negative of the above
もう can be used as an interjection to express frustration, but it is also a word that means "already" in affirmative sentences and "anymore" in negative ones.
So the end result is: "I don't want to be made to eat nattou by mom anymore."
Don't underestimate the importance of grammar.
U kinda remind me of fw with better Japanese. But still a tool.
Instead if trying to understand the point you nitpick with limited knowledge you have without understanding the bigger picture only shows your lack of knowledge rather than anything else. Do you really think I was implying that one can understand 100% Korean only knowing Japanese? Only ppl like you who wants to score cheap intellect points would do that.
I only need to learn the most common kanji and most of the rules,
I partly agree with what you said: knowing the pronunciation is important even when reading, but it's not vital. Point is, puns are for intermediate/advanced Japanese, and I'll be nowhere near by the time I reach my goal. As for kanji written with hiragana or katakana, lucky side is that I'm on my computer, I can easily type "hontou" and get 本当, and then link it to what I know it means. What's more, I'm bound to understand the pronunciation little by little, so by starting with the basics I think I can work it out. I'm aiming at a short term goal which could, in the future, become something more ambitious.
It's not like this is going to be easy, but at least much easier than taking on the whole challenge.