- 22 Feb 2008
- 18,266
- 4,926
Actually, たり is a particle (接続助詞 conjunctive particle). This is a bit confusing, but たり is originally from a classical auxiliary verb たり, and this auxiliary verb is also the etymology of た in the past form. In the grammar taught in Japanese school(国文法/学校文法), which is different from the one non-native learners usually learn, きい is treated as a conjugation form(連用形) of きく. It's better for non-native learners to remember "the past form of verb/adjective + り" as a special expression, so your understanding "a particle that's used in combination with the -ta form" is not so bad, even though り is actually not a particle.Ah so the り is not really part of the conjugation, it's more like a particle that's used in combination with the -ta form.
Check the pattern of each definition. Specifically, in what definition "personにきく" can be used.How can I be sure about the meaning of きく? It can even mean "to ask", "to follow", "to learn". Those are quite distinct verbs.
I do have the habit of just checking one-word definitions instead of taking the time to look how it fits in context. I'll work on that.(1) always use dictionaries that provide example sentences (as Toritoribe-san emphasized above), so you're not just seeing an English word and assuming the Japanese word has the same range of meanings
I was about to say it's not in my dictionary but I just looked in my particle book and it is there. "Describes simultaneous or consecutive actions".Actually, たり is a particle
と conditional expresses habit or repeatedly occurred things, so the nuance is closer to "when" than "if" there.「オレ わからないことが あると
ときどき そこの フランクリ先生にきいたりするんだ」
"If I don't understand something, I'll sometimes ask this Frankly professor for explanations [and things like that]."
You can omit it for natural translation, if you already get the nuance of たり.Should I add: "and things like that" to convey the たり construction? (Inexhaustive listing of actions or states)
一番 is an adverb there. Look up another meaning in the dictionary.一番:first
"Don't put the red medicine on the first [spot] on the right."
The definitions I have for 一番 are:一番 is an adverb there. Look up another meaning in the dictionary.
セットサレタ = セットされたやっとせした:This one is giving trouble. I think 「やっと」 is finally. Is せした some sort of past inflection?
そそいで (this is just a typo)そそいて:ーて form of 注ぐ, "to pour"
He wasn't talking about anything else. It was his initial comment. So I guess it just means Frankly's place then.How about そこの in my previous post?
Ahhhh! Ok. That's the thing when everything is in かたかな, it makes it difficult to figure out 外来語.セットサレタ = セットされた
I see. Then, そこ means "there". Probably the speaker is saying it with pointing to the place or doing like that. In this case, そこの means そこに住んでいる "living there".He wasn't talking about anything else. It was his initial comment.
セット is a noun in Japanese, so セットする works as a verb "to set".So it's セット+する... like "making a set".
I believe you can get it by yourself. :emoji_wink:Which inflection of する is that by the way?
The -te form is used to connect clauses in the temporal order, thus ボタンをおして、くすりをそそいでください means "Press the button and pour the medicine"."Press the button where the beaker has stopped in order to pour the medicine"
セットされた modifies くすり.I know I'm making to "to make a set" here but I don't see how it fits in.
The -te form is used to connect clauses in the temporal order
Exactly.:emoji_thumbsup:Could された be the past passive?
(される in the past?)
So push the button and the medicine was set...? It doesn't make sense.セットされた modifies くすり.
So push the button where the medicine was set? Doesn't make sense either.As I wrote, セットされた modifies くすり, as same as とまった場所.
かいだんをのぼった先にある modifies トビラ.
Ah yes, of course it's not. It's the polite form of 認める, isn't ("to recognize)?In your most recent post, みとめ is not a noun, as you have listed.
ズバッと is more likely "clearly/with no doubt" here.ずばっと:without hesitation, frankly.
~てくる can have two meanings; "to continue doing" and "to do and then return". However, it can't have these two meanings at the same time, thus, "continue your investigation and return" can't be correct. Actually, it's "to search and return".さがして:ーて form of 探す, "to search". So here I had my doubt that this was some kind of construction (with くる) I mean and I was right. So basically, continue your investigation and return
It's a nominalizer.こと:intangible thing again perhaps?
It's the polite form of the volitional form.Ah yes, of course it's not. It's the polite form of 認める, isn't ("to recognize)?
1. So just to be sure:It's a nominalizer.
if I wrote:continue your investigation and return" can't be correct. Actually, it's "to search and return".
Yes. This is common phrasing to say something like "I'm going to lunch."if I wrote:
食べてくる would it mean "eat and return" then? As in -te form+kuru?
These are two separate sentences and it appears you're mixing them up.「ずばっと さがしてくるのです
そうしたら キミが 犯人でないことを
みとめましょう」
"Search and return and then we'll no doubt recognize you as person who doesn't commit crimes/as not a criminal."
Better?
こと nominalizes the clause キミが犯人でない. Remember that を is attached to nouns, so you need to nominalize it in order to use as the object of 認める. It's like "I recognize that [a clause]" in English.1. So just to be sure:
こと:nominalizes 犯人でない. So a person who isn't a criminal.
That's right. Your understanding is correct.2. In this:
ビーカーがとまった場所のボタンをおして、セットされたくすりをそそいでください
So basically the ーて of 押して links two clauses namely:
「ビーカーがとまった場所のボタンをおして」
Press the button at the place where the beaker has stopped
&
「セットされたくすりをそそいでください」
Pour the medicine in the medicine that was set.
Correct? You were able to parse the two clauses that way by being able to figure out what was the main verb in both clauses I understand. If that's what it is, then I understand.
ズバッと modifies さがしてくる, not みとめましょう, as already pointed out. "Unerringly" might be more appropriate there.Another try:
「ずばっと さがしてくるのです
そうしたら キミが 犯人でないことを
みとめましょう」
"Search and return and then we'll no doubt recognize you as person who doesn't commit crimes/as not a criminal."
Better?
Yeah I know but I couldn't figure out how to plug ズバッと in the first sentence which is why:ズバッと modifies さがしてくる, not みとめましょう
So the こと here is really just to be grammatically correct so that it's accordance with the purpose of を.こと nominalizes a clause キミが犯人でない. Remember that を is attached to nouns, so you need to nominalize it in order to use as the object of 認める.
No, I didn't say I lived in Japan.@mdchachi: Wow, you have a house in Japan? Did you win the lottery?: When I was in Japan I couldn't sit in my tub.
That's a strange way to put it. It's there to make the sentence comprehensible and usually the best way to do that is to follow the rules of grammar.So the こと here is really just to be grammatically correct so that it's accordance with the purpose of を.
I thought you said you read Tae Kim's guide twice.もってない人: a person who doesn't have. How would you define もってない here? It's like verb which qualifies a noun.
Note, you can't tell if it's plural people or singular somebody from this sentence alone."What? There are some people without tickets?!"
It's the quotative と. It should be in your grammar or particle dictionary.と: 助詞:does the 「と」there have a specific meaning since it's a final particle or is it the usual 「と」that just so happens to be at the end of a sentence?