Society Japanese beauty ideals

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,053
Reaction score
18,908
I just stumbled across an interesting piece on Nippon.com on (the maybe not so) evolving Japanese beauty standards. The original interview with Prof Harashima was conducted in 2009 but seems to be as accurate today as it was when it first appeared:

A beautiful face might seem eternal, but standards of beauty change over time. In recent years, Japan has idealised the "small face" (小顔 kogao) for both women and men. Prof Harashima Hiroshi (原島博), 79, received his doctorate in engineering from the University of Tokyo and has been a visiting researcher at Stanford University and a professor at the University of Tokyo. He founded the Japan Academy of Facial Studies in 1995. In the interview, he discusses how facial characteristics have changed in Japan in line with societal changes and evolving ideas about beauty.

Beauty standards have changed significantly:

In terms of the general image, the Jōmon physiognomy is boldly chiseled and sharply defined, while Yayoi features are flatter and more subtle. You might say the Jōmon face has a more Western flavor and the Yayoi a more Eastern flavor. The Mongolian wrestlers who have become so dominant in professional sumō of late have typical Yayoi faces.

And the face of modernisation is altogether different:

One aspect of daily life that has changed dramatically is diet. Since the end of World War II, the Japanese diet has become heavily slanted toward soft foods. In earlier times, people would take about an hour to finish an average meal in order to chew their food well, as everyone was told to do. These days you need no more than five or ten minutes. The amount of chewing that we do has decreased drastically. Things like hamburgers hardly require any chewing, so our masticatory strength has declined, and our jaws don't grow as large as they used to. I was wondering what people's faces would look like a hundred years from now if current trends continued, so I collaborated with the anthropologist Baba Hisao to generate a computer simulation. The result is a bit different for men and women, but one thing both have in common is smaller jaws. Men's faces become triangular. Women's faces, which are rounder than men's to begin with, end up rounder still because of the smaller jaw.

The emergence of the "small face":

[...] women's magazines these days are full of makeup and hair tips for making one's face look smaller or thinner. I can think of a number of explanations. One has to do with fashion in clothing, and the fact that the Japanese now wear Western-style clothes instead of traditional Japanese attire. With Japanese-style clothing, a larger face is more becoming. But a smaller face looks better with Western clothes, because they're designed for Westerners, who have smaller faces. Another key point about the term kogao is that it suggests not only a physically small face but a childlike face. The craze for kogao is in part a craze for cute faces, reflecting our society's bias toward the cute and childish as opposed to the mature. At some level, I think it's closely intertwined with the infantilization that we see throughout our society.

Three-second vs thirty-year beauty:

My own theory is that feminine beauty can be classified according to a time scale, ranging from three seconds to thirty years. A three-second beauty is someone who makes you turn your head involuntarily when you see her on the street and think, "Wow, what a beautiful woman!" This is almost completely superficial. In fact, it may have more to do with her figure and how she's dressed than her face. Next is the three-minute beauty. A typical example would be a receptionist, someone with whom you communicate for about three minutes. She presents you with a professionally arranged countenance and deals with you across a counter that creates an impassable barrier. Next comes the thirty-minute beauty. When you talk with someone for thirty minutes, her true countenance comes through, and you find beauty not in her superficial features but in the natural charm of her facial expressions. With a three-day beauty, the beauty you perceive is a product not just of her countenance but of her values and her outlook on life. Finally, there's the thirty-year beauty. This is the woman who has been with you over the years, through thick and thin, and even though you may have cheated once or twice, in the end you know she's the one for you.


If you're interested in why effeminate men (such as K-pop and J-pop celebs) and masculine women (Takarazuka, female wrestlers) are all the rage, read the entire interview here:

 
A male engineering professor, who is that old, would not seem to be a credible source when expounding on beauty, and its evolution, k-pop, j-pop, diet, and really, only five or ten minutes now to finish a meal? Tell me you're out of touch without telling me you're out of touch.

I was once told, by a woman, that women look at women more than men look at women. I can't remember a woman I've mentioned that to who hasn't agreed with it.

And how about that "infantilization that we see throughout our society"? Does that come from the engineer, or his anthropologist collaborator?

I'll make a wild guess--although they went to different universities (U-Tokyo vs Waseda), Professor Harashima probably crossed paths with Mr. Mori.
 
A couple of things caught my eye, but this one I'm still ruminating over
With Japanese-style clothing, a larger face is more becoming.
Hmm. Sounds like something an old dude would say.

And for some reason, the 3-second beauty "theory" makes me cringe, but I can't explain why. It sounds like something you'd say with your male friends down at the pub, after a few beers. It's vaguely objectifying, and it's not really saying anything or than "hot girls are hot, but you feel a different kind of affection for your wife of 30 years". Is there a Nobel prize for Obvious Statements?
Next is the three-minute beauty. A typical example would be a receptionist, someone with whom you communicate for about three minutes. She presents you with a professionally arranged countenance and deals with you across a counter that creates an impassable barrier.
This kind of sentence seems impossible in the US. Its not just the outdated role model of the beautiful young receptionist, but its the scholarly presentation of this cliche, followed by the regretful-sounding "impassable barrier" that makes me cringe. Or, as the kids say, it gives me the ick. Like, "excuse me professor, but what are you intending to do with that beautiful receptionist were it not for that impassable barrier?"
 
it's not really saying anything or than "hot girls are hot, but you feel a different kind of affection for your wife of 30 years".
"This is the woman who has been with you over the years, through thick and thin, and even though you may have cheated once or twice, in the end you know she's the one for you."

Sounds like true love.
 
Even though you may have cheated once or twice with that hot chick at the receptionist's desk...
 
Back
Top Bottom