Are you talking about in the example of traveling (overseas etc) へ is more likely than に帰る ?Yes, へ would be more common, but you can use に, too.
～ので : to state the reason (sentence + ので）
～にいく : go to ～
e.g.
図書館に勉強しに行く go to the library to study
散歩に行く、散歩しに行く go for a walk
Ah, that is what I was thinking but I couldn't make the sentence out fully.As a friend of mine is going back to his country
I went to the airport to see him off.
☝Many things to look up in the dictionary and mull over.One of the meanings of 送る：
去って行く人と一緒に行く。
(accompany someone who is leaving, often to see off the person.)
(ア)去って行く人に、途中まで、あるいは目的地までついて行く。
e.g.
「駅まで送って行く」「車で家まで送る」
(イ)去って行く人に対し、別れる地点で名残を惜しんだり別れの挨拶したりする。
e.g.
「成田空港で両親を送った」「 A 君を送る会」
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn/24717/m0u/送る/
Cool!Yes, へ would be more common, but you can use に, too.
まで indicates a destination; not only "temporal"(i.e. "until") but also "spatial."
As undrentide-san explained, 送りに行った is an ambiguous expression. It can be interpreted both as 見送りに行った and 送って行った.
空港まで見送りに行った。
I went to the airport to see him/her off.
空港まで送って行った。
I took him/her to the airport.
Makes sense to me! (for now)The reason "I" went to the airport was "a friend of mine will go back to his/her own country," or s/he hasn't gone back yet at that time. That's why the present form is used here. See below. "I" felt lonely AFTER s/he went back.
友達が国へ帰ったので、寂しくなった。
I felt lonely, because my friend went back to his/her own country.
Hmm, I do some research, and yes, 窶堙 is more often used in a corpus. They would be basically interchangeable.Are you talking about in the example of traveling (overseas etc) 窶堙 is more likely than 窶堙俄?ｹA窶堙ｩ ?
Because I somehow end up seeing 窶堙 much more that that for everyday activities (going back to a house, hometown, back to someone, etc.)
窶倪?披?堙≫?堙?行窶堋ｭ is not same to ﾅ陳ｩ窶倪?披?堙ｩ. 窶ｹﾃｳﾂ港窶堙懌?堙??倪?披?堙≫?堙?行窶堙≫?堋ｽ just means that "I" dropped him off at the airport, so "I" might leave him and might not see him off.I wonder, why can't you say 窶ｹﾃｳﾂ港窶堙俄?倪?披?堙≫?堙?行窶堙≫?堋ｽﾂ？So ﾅ陳ｩ窶倪?披?堙ｨ means "to send someone off" according to WWWJDIC. Hm.
Yes. 窶ｹA窶堙≫?堙??堋｢窶堙ｩ often has a nuance of "they will return here."窶認窶傳窶堋ｪﾂ坂?倪?堙問?ｹA窶堙≫?堙??堋｢窶堙ｩ窶堙娯?堙?，ﾅｽﾃ｢窶堋ｵ窶堋ｩ窶堙≫?堋ｽﾂ。
Would this translate to, Because my friend went back to their country, I was lonely?
Both are viable pronunciations with slightly different meanings attached. そうさつ is when two people kill each, and both end up dying simultaneously ? お互いに殺し合うI don't know if the OP will read this, but here's my take on it anyway.
There are not too many shortcuts around this problem. It's a matter of just understanding lots and lots and lots of word. Even the Japanese stumble on them sometimes (eg. 相殺 is pronounsed sousai, but many of the uninitiated would incorrectedly pronounce it sousatu)
Both are viable pronunciations with slightly different meanings attached. 窶堋ｻ窶堋､窶堋ｳ窶堙 is when two people kill each, and both end up dying simultaneously ? 窶堋ｨﾅ津昶?堋｢窶堙嫁ｽE窶堋ｵﾂ坂?｡窶堋､
ﾂ債｡窶敕凪?堙坂?堙昶?堙ｱ窶堙遺?堋ｳ窶堙ｱ
That may be best for now.As per -窶堙寂?堋ｩ窶堙ｨ and -窶堙??堋ｱ窶堙ｫ my professor told me to just consider them the same thing as to relieve my mind.
Right, I was told to think of it as a pronoun. Unfortunately, the sentence structure I am used to is the object being introduced, THEN the 窶堙個。For example, ﾅｽ窶樞?堋ｪﾂ青ｶ窶堙懌?堙ｪ窶堋ｽ窶堙懌?堋ｿ窶堙債坂?塲ｽR窶堙??堋｢窶堋､窶堙娯?堙??堋ｷ is perfectly understandable for me.
Yes, in the red boxes I interpreted everything before the 窶堙娯?堙 as being the subject of being rude.
So that 窶堙?窶堋｢窶堙ｩ is 窶堙?ﾂ：also and 窶堋｢窶堙ｩﾂ：is (exists)? Maybe like ﾅｽﾂｩ窶彎ﾅｽﾃ披?堋ｪ窶堋?窶堙ｩﾂ。ﾅｽﾃ披?堙?窶堋?窶堙ｩﾂ。ﾂ？
Oh, I forgot about that problem I had with 窶堙娯?堋ｱ窶堙ｫﾂ。That was a hassle and a half. It turned out that he told me that 窶堙寂?堋ｩ窶堙ｨ was treated like a noun, or something of that nature. I think I can get it now but it is extremely shaky.
No, the expression 窶堙娯?堋ｲ窶堙ｫ doesn't exist. It's only 窶堙娯?堋ｱ窶堙ｫ.From what I understand, nouns take 窶堙娯?堋ｱ窶堙ｫﾂ／窶堙娯?堋ｲ窶堙ｫ whereas verbs do not have a 窶堙個，much like 窶堙??堋ｫ (ﾅ?wﾂ青ｶ窶堙娯?堙??堋ｫﾂ／窶堋ｽ窶堙冷?堙ｩ窶堙??堋ｫﾂ）ﾂ。
図書館へ行かないで家で勉強する学生もいる。So that もいる is も：also and いる：is (exists)? Maybe like 自転車がある。車もある。？
No, not always. 窶堋ｲ窶堙ｫ is used with temporal/time-concerning words, as I wrote.I see. So the no koro is turned to goro.
The former is for the progressive or "the one who is committing a crime."窶敕?催溪?堙ｰ窶堋ｵ窶堙??堋｢窶堙ｩﾂ人 / 窶敕?催溪?堙ｰ窶堋ｷ窶堙ｩﾂ人
If these two sentences are gramatically correct, would this mean "A person committing crimes" and "A crime committer"?
No. The pronoun should be 窶堙??堋ｱ窶堙ｫ for that case. The 窶堙 in 窶愬停?ｹﾅｾ窶堙坂?堙俄?堋ｬ窶堙｢窶堋ｩ窶堙遺?堙娯?堙??堋ｷ is interpreted as the explanatory 窶堙啓/url], as same as the 窶堙 in ﾅｽ窶樞?堋ｪﾂ青ｶ窶堙懌?堙ｪ窶堋ｽ窶堙懌?堋ｿ窶堙債坂?塲ｽR窶堙??堋｢窶堋､窶堙娯?堙??堋ｷ.Is this sentence acceptable?
窶愬停?ｹﾅｾ窶堙坂?堙俄?堋ｬ窶堙｢窶堋ｩ窶堙遺?堙娯?堙??堋ｷﾂ。(窶堙個?‖notherﾂ 窶愬停?ｹﾅｾﾂ）
:?You meant 窶堋ｨ窶堙ｧ窶堙ｪ窶堙ｩ, by any chance?I'm also reading about ﾂ降窶堙ｨ窶堙ｩ...isn't 窶堋ｨ窶堙ｨ窶堙ｩ also a honorific verb?
[url]https://jref.com/showthread.php?p=633252#post633252
Since it is 窶堙債。ﾂ。ﾂ。窶堋?窶堙ｨ窶堙懌?堋ｷ instead of 窶堋ｪﾂ。ﾂ。ﾂ。窶堋?窶堙ｨ窶堙懌?堋ｷ it is like what was mentioned a few pages ago, not saying "There is ... that exists" but the fact it is located there, right?
You need to think about it in Japanese. For instance, ﾋ?ｪﾅｽﾅｾﾅ?ﾃ板出窶堋ｩ窶堋ｯ窶堙??堋｢窶堋ｽ is far more common than ﾋ?ｪﾅｽﾅｾﾅ?ﾃ板出窶堋ｩ窶堋ｯ窶堋ｽ.I have trouble with "I went out for an hour"...it works? Is it because it's not an "activity", but it is a change?
What about sleep? Isn't that a huge change? You go from sleeping until you are awake....
So if I were to say that PF窶堙坂?怒窶堙ｰﾅｽﾃ倪?堙ｨ窶堙??堋｢窶堙懌?堋ｷ...what would it mean? Does it mean that he is borrowING the book?
How about 窶彭ﾅｽﾃ披?堙ｰﾂ湘ｦ窶堙≫?堙??堋｢窶堙ｩﾂ？
And how would you say "he is crossing the street"?
Why is ﾂ住窶堙ｱ窶堙??堋｢窶堙ｩ not a "continous action Group 1" verb?
Difference between yoko/よこ and tonari/となり--
Reviewing Genki I. Came across something interesting.
PF窶堋ｳ窶堙ｱ窶堙更窶堋ｳ窶堙ｱ窶堙娯?堋ｱ窶堙??堋ｪﾂ好窶堋ｫ窶堙??堋ｷﾂ。ﾂ（Romantically)
ﾆ馳ﾆ停?懌?堙哉弾ﾆ置ﾆ停?ｹ窶堙啓B]窶堙ｦ窶堋ｱ[/B]窶堙??堋ｷﾂ。ﾂ（Not 窶堋ｻ窶堙 or 窶堙??堙遺?堙ｨﾂ）
That should be 窶彭ﾅｽﾃ納COLOR="Red"]窶堙閏/B][/COLOR]ﾂ湘ｦ窶堙≫?堙??堋｢窶堙ｩ. This isn't Korean.窶彭ﾅｽﾃ披?堙ｰﾂ湘ｦ窶堙≫?堙??堋｢窶堙ｩﾂ？
Actually, that's the opposite.;-)I actually forgot how to say, "I can speak better in English than Japanese".
ﾅｽ窶樞?堙坂?ｰpﾅ津ｪ窶堙ｦ窶堙ｨ窶愿ｺ窶怒ﾅ津ｪ窶堙戸彙窶堋ｹ窶堙ｩ窶堙娯?堙吮?堋､窶堋ｪﾂ湘｣ﾅｽﾃｨ窶堙??堋ｷﾂ？ Sounds very wrong.
Almost.I think this is incorrect.
窶啖ﾅ椎ｽ窶啖窶愿ｺ窶堋ｲ窶堙ｫ窶愿ｺ窶怒ﾅ津ｪ窶堙娯?｢ﾃ冷?ｹﾂｭ窶堙ｰﾅｽn窶堙溪?堙ｦ窶堋､窶堙?ｽv窶堋｢窶堙懌?堋ｷﾂ。