- 23 Sep 2005
- 1,295
- 76
Are you equating abortion to dropping a live baby into a toilet and drowning him?Consider abortion is common in Japan ... erh ... no surprise
Are you equating abortion to dropping a live baby into a toilet and drowning him?
...what? How is early termination of a pregnancy the same concept as carrying a child to term in secret, then purposefully drowning the child AFTER it has been born and surviving outside of the womb? Only the means differ a LITTLE? What an outrageous statement.Well the concept is the same. Only the means differ a bit.
What punishment, she was acquitted of all charges.Anyhow, stupidity and the lack of healthy selfishness always receives its punishment, this case is no different. The child died, its sad yeah. Not that im particularly surprised about all this, this wouldn't be the first time, nor the last.
What punishment, she was acquitted of all charges.
However, the police seem to appeal to a higher court.
Hiroyuki, I think you will find 遺棄致死罪 is "Reckless abandonment resulting in death, involuntary manslaughter".If I examine her crime characteristics,
By a Japanese law,
1. When she killed a baby with the urge to kill,
Murder is applied.
2. When she has killed a baby in an accident at the time of the birth in a lavatory,
Protection person in charge involuntary homicide
An abandonment fatal crime
3. When a baby already died at the time of the birth,
Innocence
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/news/20080313-OYT1T00556.htm
Eighteen is old enough to know the consequences of your actions, she choose not to tell anybody, she choose not to seek professional help for her and her child...at what point is a person responsible for their own actions?
She had nine months to make a decision about what to do and in the end she choose the path that ended up killing the baby. If that isn't at least pre-meditated reckless endangerment I don't know what is. I'm not saying she should be punished, necessarily, but she shouldn't be able to just walk away.