Is it really a legal "obligation?" If so, I believe they will try to get the money deducted from the paycheck like the rest of the taxes. I believe NHK's fee is for people who actually watch those programs. Since it is impossible for them to track down who watches those programs, NHK just goes after everyone who has TV "assuming" those people will watch NHK. Assumption does not go well in the legal terms.By the way, it is a legal obligation; a kind of tax, if you will.
Like Mikawa san said unless you can prove you dont have a TV technically you are required to pay for the service.Just say you don't have a TV or whatever. It's not like you're breaking a law or something.
There actually were plans last year to introduce a bill in Parliament making payment mandatory after too many subscribers stopped in protest citing a series of embezzlement scandals involving NHK higher ups....In the end, though, it was withdrawn after those misappropriations plus other crimes and cases of questionable ethical judgement made it too embarrassing even for supporters to champion.In my years in Japan this never really came up as an issue for me, so i'm not sure what i would have done - my apartments had had gaijin residents before me, (who had presumably refused to pay), so the NHK man never called.
I suppose many would say that morally one should pay the subscription. However, there's obviously a real problem with the law here if nothing can be done if someone refuses to pay. Why, I wonder? Are there any plans afoot to toughen up the laws?
And "we" gaijin wonder why we get a bad name? I don't agree with the forced fee, but that is the way it is. Just pay it, its only 4000 yen.
Oh and BTW, the "I don't watch TV" line is a load of crap, b/c how much of the tax that you pay to the government is used that will never, ever benifit you or used to build a building/facility that you will never use?
I don't know if the collectors are paid on commission like traditional sales people, but I wouldn't be surprised if they're getting a handsome cut of their day's bounty.Dave sir, it's not forced in the sense that there seems to be no real legal weight behind it. And I was never asked for it at all when I lived in Japan! I can see it's forced in the sense that, by some accounts, some collectors can be extremely persistent or even become unpleasant, but that is even more reason for me not to play along with a system I think is at best deeply flawed.
Dave sir, it's not forced in the sense that there seems to be no real legal weight behind it. And I was never asked for it at all when I lived in Japan! I can see it's forced in the sense that, by some accounts, some collectors can be extremely persistent or even become unpleasant, but that is even more reason for me not to play along with a system I think is at best deeply flawed.
To paraphrase your post, imho it's not 'nonsense' to argue the 'I don't watch TV' line. Here in the UK, if you can prove that your TV isn't capable of receiving live broadcasts (for example if you modify your set) then you don't have to pay. From what some posters have written, it seems you might be able to do the same thing in Japan. But really, when there is no comeback, why go to the trouble of modifying your TV or removing any sort of antenna from your premises - just don't watch TV, and refuse to pay on that basis when the collector knocks. The Government have made it that easy for you!
The comparison with tax again doesn't work on that basis. Taxes are most certainly backed up by the full force of law - and if they weren't i'm sure you'd find plenty of people would stop paying them. Still, some folk refuse to pay taxes they disagree with as a matter of principle, and are imprisoned!
Elizabeth san many thanks for that information, it's very interesting to read about why many Japanese refuse to pay the fees.