Chiaki 4 L1fe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chiaki_Kuriyama_Fan
  • Start date Start date
she was good in Ju-on too but i want her in a movie where she isnt killed!
 
can't rember but i have screenshots if you want them
 
Chiaki Kuriyama

I'm sure there are people here that will know this.

Is it true that the nude photos of Chiaki Kuriyama were taken when she was 13?
I haven't seen the photos myself.
But surely if she was only 13...then that's illegal, even in Japan. I heard that the rumour was bullsh!t and she was really 18.
 
I've also heard that she wasn't 13 - and I think I read in some homepage on her that she wasn't, that she was really anout 17 years old.
People might think she's 13, especially people who aren't used seeing the very small japanese women, she looks very young, and... um.. petite.
The pictures are nice, I'm a girl, so I might watch them in a different way... but they're all artistic and nicely shot.
Do you really think taking nude pictures of a 13 year old would be illegal in Japan? 12 years old is the age when they can have sex legally... or am I wrong?
 
if the legal age is 12 then i withdraw my comment...but that does seem really young. i do know that places in south american have a very low legal age.
Chiaki_Kuriyama_Fan: if the fotos were taken aged 13, and seeing that you are 13...is there a difference between someone your looking and 'enjoying' the fotos and someone my age or older? in your opinion of course.
it raises the question that if you are of a similar age to the 'model'...if she is young it may be legaly wrong but is it morally wrong?...if you see what i mean.
for me to look at fotos of a 20 year old is fine both legally and morally...for someone aged 60 to look at the same fotos would be legally ok - but morally, well, people would refer to them as dirty or peverted. and turning that on it's head...someone aged 13 looking at someone of the same age is legally wrong, but what about moralality?
 
so me looking at them, doesnt mean i masturbate over them now does it.....but it probally is legaly wrong, so is it illegal for someone my age to look at porno of a 20 year old????
 
At your age, in this country, it is illegal for you to purchase, or attempt to purchase porn. It is also illegal for anyone to sell you porn.You must be 18.
The soft porn you get in newspapers, such as The Sport is probably legal.
As for in the privacy of your own home, I think you can nick your brothers or dads (that's if you have an older brother)
:-) 🙂 :-)
 
well, those pictures really isn't PORN, they are just nude, artistic pictures. Nude and porn are two different things. Also it depends a lot on who watches them - some pervert could make porn out of it, but I guess perverts could make porn out of anything... 😲
 
haha but you are a pervert Liam. And a backstabber! *she didn't forget the killing*
 
Chiaki_Kuriyama_Fan said:
so me looking at them, doesnt mean i masturbate over them now does it.....but it probally is legaly wrong, so is it illegal for someone my age to look at porno of a 20 year old????
you misunderstand me...
technically it is illegal because you aren't 18. morally i wouldn't say it was wrong. i not going to pretend that when i was your age i didn't look at pornographic material. and whether you maturbate or not is your business my friend 😌

isayhello said:
well, those pictures really isn't PORN, they are just nude, artistic pictures. Nude and porn are two different things. Also it depends a lot on who watches them - some pervert could make porn out of it, but I guess perverts could make porn out of anything... 😲
i don't think it's a case of whether it is porn or not.
look at it this way if you will...(a hyperthectical theory)
there's a photo on the internet of someone who looks like Chiaki Kuriyama, in the same pose, revealing the same amont of her body, she is also 13 (assuming that the photos of C K are when she was 13). but the photo is taken in the girls bedroom on a regular digital camera or polaroid, it's not taken by a professional photographer and it's published on the net for everyone and anyone to see.
in this situation would you look at it in the same way as the photographs of Chiaki Kuriyama?
would you think; 'she's hot' or 'the photos are beautiful and tasteful and not pornographic' or would you think 'that's sick' or 'perverted'?

i can see this thread is getting a little like the prosecution for the michael jackson trial, so feel free not to reply and it'll be left alone.
 
I can see your point, smoke - speaking of your theory, if I ever saw those pictures I'd say they were sick and wrong. The only difference is Chiaki is a celibrity, and when someone is famous we tend to look upon them differently, ne?
So you might be right. But the question still remains wether she really IS 13... I still don't believe it, I think she's older. And there's a lot of difference between a 13 year old and a 17 year old...
Anyways, I wonder in what purpose they were taken... that's also something that could put the pictures in a different light. If she did them for some male-magazine, I'd definitely think it was porn - but in case it's some artist who did it for some museum exhibition, I don't know... In theory, the pictures will always remain nude pics, but you can look upon it in many different ways, right?
 
smoke said:
speaking of porn...my last post was my 69th
kinda fitting!

hehe haha VERY fitting... hm.. 😌
Anyways, do think the nude pictures are wrong in any way?
 
btw i found out that most female actors in japan do these shoots, kinda like manifestos this is how directors decide to give them a start up career..=)
 
just trying to find the site, i think it might have been on the chiaki fandom....
 
heh-he. Cool. So to become a famous female celebrity in Japan, one has to do nude photographs? What about the MALE actors? 😍
 
whoa! HOPE THEY DO! There are sooooo many japanese male actors I want to see nude. *dies in a puddle of nosebleed*
 
lol ;: pokes ::, but don't japanesme ne have tiny dicks?
 
Back
Top Bottom