9.0 Earthquake/Tsunami/Fukushima

I am due to attend a wedding celebration in kyoto in early april. the actual wedding happened in china 2months ago.
I am thinking this would be a bad time to come to kyoto and osaka for a holiday and we should cancel.
my partner is desperate to go as it is her son and she sees little of him
what are the pros and cons to help me decide?
carl in north wales uk

My opinion is to go. Kyoto is a long way away from the affected areas.

Go and celebrate if the occasion calls for it. A unfortunate event like this will not cause the Japanese people to lose all ability to feel joy. If anything it's a good thing to have a celebration, it's a reminder that life goes on.
 
I live in Morioka, about 150km north of Sendai. At the time of the quake, I happened to be in a conference in Downtown Sendai. After spending 4 nights in an evacuation camp, I managed to make my way back home.

During my stay in the camp, I got hired by Skynews crew as a local guide/translator, which brought me to coastal villages such as Natori, Iwanuma, Tagajo, and Sendai Port, all hard hit by the tsunami. When we visited a neighborhood of 105 families in Iwanuma, rescue workers were not there yet, as a result I had to witness unclaimed bodies while the crew filmed the place.

I worked for them because there was no gasoline in the city (unless you wait in queue a whole night), and had no means of getting out of the city to head for Morioka. So I thought I should be doing something more productive while being an evacuee myself. It turned out they were not really interested in getting the words out simply, but rather looking for "beautiful" destructions, "fantastic footage" of a grief-stricken lady looking for her 99 year old mother in the ruin.

Back in Morioka, economic activities are almost at halt, as there is simply no fuel at pumps. In Sendai, you could try waiting for 10 hours at gas stations, and you had a chance. In here, there is no chance so there is not even a queue.
 
There's another way to look at it. The people of Japan need some joy. Sometimes the only way to do so is to live vicariously through others.

As part of your celebration, why not donate to the relief effort?

Incidentally, from the people I am in contact with, that part of the country was not greatly affected by the recent catastrophe.
 
Analysis: Warning raises fears

Over the days of the Fukushima crisis, attention has switched from reactor 1 to reactor 3, to 2, back to 3 - and now, to 4.

This is a surprise.

Reactors 4, 5 and 6 were shut down at the time of Friday's earthquake, with some or all of their fuel rods extracted and left in cooling ponds that each reactor building has under its roof.

Once a reactor is turned off, radioactivity and heat generation in the rods die away quickly; down to 7% of the original power within a second of switch-off, 5% within a minute, 0.5% within a day.

Transferred to the cooling pond, allowing technicians to do routine maintenance on the reactor, the rods are supposed to sit quietly until the time comes for their re-insertion or their journey towards disposal.

The tops of the rods are supposed to be about 5m (16ft) below the water surface.

The water keeps them cool and also blocks the release of gamma rays that would harm people in the vicinity.

So why is it that the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) has warned: "The possibility of re-criticality is not zero"?

If you are in any doubt as to what this means, it is that in the company's view, it is possible that enough fissile uranium is present in enough density to form a critical mass in the cooling pond - meaning that a nuclear fission reaction could start in the building, outside the containment shield that surrounds the actual reactor.

If it happened, this would lead to the enhanced and sustained release of radioactive materials - though not a nuclear explosion.

Full Story;

Surprise 'critical' warning raises nuclear fears
 
Interesting question round is going on at the reuters website. People can post questions to nuclear engineering expert Dr. Yaron Danon, Director of the Gaerttner LINAC laboratory and his colleague Dr. Peter Caracappa, who is a radiation safety expert.

Japan earthquake
 
What the hell is going on with the Fukushima nuclear power plant? It's gone from bad, worse, and now to this. That which I do not have a word for.
 
I've become completely confused by this now, and I have no idea what is happening anymore. This is what happens when I decide to sleep at night.
 
Over the days of the Fukushima crisis, attention has switched from reactor 1 to reactor 3, to 2, back to 3 - and now, to 4. This is a surprise.

Yes, it is a surprise.

Reactors 4, 5 and 6 were shut down at the time of Friday's earthquake, with some or all of their fuel rods extracted and left in cooling ponds that each reactor building has under its roof.

This is correct.

Once a reactor is turned off, radioactivity and heat generation in the rods die away quickly; down to 7% of the original power within a second of switch-off, 5% within a minute, 0.5% within a day.

This is not correct. The reactors (No.1, 2 and 3) were turned off simultaneously on earthquake of last Friday, but heat generation in the rods did not die but continued as ordinary cooling system collapsed + backup system failed (I don't know how may backups though), due to Tsunami.

Although I am not familiar with nuclear plants, heat generation does not die quickly even in the normal situation. But it will take some "YEARS". That's why we need to transfer the rods to the cooling pond for a period of some months, and then moved to storage for further cooling and sealing.

Problem is .... failure of the cooling system, affected by Tsunami. For this reason, we are seeing problems one after another. And if we cannot stop heat generation of fuel rods .... melting of rods/nuclear fuels .... and in the worst case, self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction.

Melting of rods/nuclear fuels produce radioactibity, which may cause problems of human health, but as we are exposed with radioactivity even in ordinary life. Radioactivity itself is not fatal, but level is important.

Tokyo is 200km away from Fukushima Nuclear Plant. Evacuation is not necessary so far.
 
... and in the worst case, self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction.

When it happens, then catastrophy, as it produces very very very strong radiation ray (not the same as ordinary radiation ray such as X-ray).

But the odd is low, I believe.
Because the reactors had already been turned off 5 days ago and the rods have somewhat been cooled in water/seawater, while self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction needs very very high temprature.

Plant engineers are battling now, and I believe they can overcome difficulty and succeed in cooling.
 
Hi,
I want to show in Germany on a just-started action. All tweets and Facebook likes Japan provide an iodine tablets. Take a look at
xpaket.de/jodtabletten-paket-fur-japan/
 
"Tokyo Electric Power: Japan's BP?"

The unfolding disaster at Japan's Fukushima nuclear power complex has focused attention on the site's operator - the Tokyo Electric Power Company.

It is hard not to have some sympathy for Tepco, as the company is known, as its engineers are racing to avoid catastrophic meltdowns at nuclear plants in Japan.

Much like oil giant BP - which found itself at the centre of a storm when a blast at a rig killed 11 people and caused the worst oil spill in US history off the Gulf of Mexico - Tepco finds itself struggling to cope with a situation it never saw coming.

Public relations must rank low on the list of priorities as it battles to contain the unimaginable amid the devastation caused by a massive earthquake and the subsequent tsunami.


Full Story;

Is Tokyo Electric Power becoming Japan's BP?

"In pictures: Japan on edge";

In pictures: Japan earthquake

Meanwhile, survivors of Friday's earthquake and tsunami are enduring snow and freezing temperatures, as supplies begin to reach the worst affected areas;
BBC6-1.webp
 
Last edited:
"Anger over Japan nuclear exodus";

The governor of the region at the centre of Japan's nuclear crisis has criticised official handling of the evacuation of the area around the stricken Fukushima Daiichi power plant.

Fukushima prefecture governor Yuhei Sato said: "Anxiety and anger felt by people have reached boiling point."

Engineers are racing to avert a nuclear catastrophe at Fukushima Daiichi, badly damaged by Friday's quake and tsunami.

The government has declared a 20km (12-mile) evacuation zone around it.

Another 140,000 people living between 20-30km of the facility were told on Tuesday not to leave their homes, while the US embassy has advised American citizens living within 80km of the plant to evacuate or seek shelter.

Mr Sato said centres already housing people who had been moved from their homes near the plant did not have enough hot meals and basic necessities such as fuel and medical supplies. "We're lacking everything," he said.

Full Story;

Japan earthquake: Anger over Fukushima evacuation plan
 
Other Updates;

1825: Reuters reports that the quake has led to the shutdown of roughly one third of Japan's oil refining capacity of 4.5 million barrels per day. More than one fifth of its nuclear capacity, estimated at 49 gigawatts, is also believed to have been cut off.

1823: Our correspondent says there is also growing suspicion that the government and the Tokyo Electric Company (Tepco) are not telling the whole truth about the danger to the public. "We don't trust them," one young mother told him. "They want people to stay calm so they cover up the truth. We are all very afraid she said and we want to find a way to leave the country."

1821: The BBC's Rupert Wingfield-Hayes in Tokyo says there were hundreds of people in the main train station on Wednesday afternoon trying to board bullet trains heading south to Osaka and beyond. "Many were families with young children. They said they wanted to get far away from Tokyo and the radiation danger," he says.

1818: The US Environmental Protection Agency says it is increasing its monitoring of radiation along the western coast and Pacific territories, AP reports. However the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has said it does not expect harmful levels to reach North America.

1810: The legal exposure limit for the workers was raised on Wednesday from 100 to 250 millisieverts, a move officials said was "unavoidable". Most individuals will absorb 6 millisieverts a year, AP reports.

1809: "I don't know any other way to say it, but this is like suicide fighters in a war." That's how Keiichi Nakagawa, associate professor of the Department of Radiology at the University of Tokyo Hospital, described the 180 workers battling flames at Fukushima.

1806: The British embassy reports that there is still "no real human health issue that people should be concerned about". But the statement continues: "Due to the evolving situation at the Fukushima nuclear facility and potential disruptions to the supply of goods, transport, communications, power and other infrastructure, British nationals in Tokyo and to the north of Tokyo should consider leaving the area."

1803: The UK is advising its citizens to consider leaving northern Japan, Reuters reports.

1759: The embassy says there are "numerous factors in the aftermath of the earthquake and Tsunami, including weather, wind direction and speed, and the nature of the reactor problem that affect the risk of radioactive contamination within this 50 mile (80 km) radius or the possibility of lower-level radioactive materials reaching greater distances."

1757: This is an extract is from the US embassy's advice to its citizens in Japan: "Consistent with the NRC [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] guidelines that apply to such a situation in the United States, we are recommending, as a precaution, that American citizens who live within 50 miles (80 kilometers) of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant evacuate the area or to take shelter indoors if safe evacuation is not practical."

1755: Earlier on Wednesday, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said the team had been sent home because they were not integrated into the wider rescue effort and had not brought their own logistical supplies.

1752: Mr Gray said the fault lay with the embassy. "The Japanese government issued a permit but we needed a letter from the British embassy to get the permit. They said because we weren't part of the British response, we're a non-government organisation, we couldn't have a letter."

1750: The International Rescue Corps has returned to the UK after it was sent back from Japan. Team leader Ray Gray said he was disappointed to be home so soon. "We flew over there with the intention of doing what I thought would have been a good job and a worthwhile job at the request of the Japanese government, and we've spent two days in an airport because we couldn't get a permit to get on the road from the British embassy."

1743: The Swiss foreign ministry said it would lay on charter flights if necessary to bring Swiss nationals home.

1742: Switzerland has also advised that its citizens leave north-east Japan and Tokyo. "At the moment, the development in the damaged nuclear facility is unpredictable and aftershocks are possible," said Swiss president Micheline Calmy-Rey.

1738: The US is advising its citizens living within 80km (50 miles) of Fukushima to evacuate or stay indoors.

1735: The Fukushima plant has a total of six nuclear reactors - all of which have been affected to varying degrees. Our annotated aerial picture shows the layout of the site and outlines what workers are facing at each reactor.

1720: Kyodo reports that the US military is to fly an unmanned plane over Fukushima, equipped with infrared sensors, to give an aerial view of what is going on.

1702: Mr Ellmann tells the BBC World Service that the embassy is taking calls around the clock, "receiving more than 1000 calls a day". A 114-strong French rescue team "is now in Sendai helping the Japanes search and rescue teams", he adds.

1701: France is arranging for extra planes to take their nationals home from Japan on Thursday. Julian Ellmann, spokesman for the embassy in Tokyo, says the advice for French citizens in the capital is "to go the south of Japan, to Kyoto, for example, and for those who want to, come back to France".

...

...

...

1649: On Tuesday, Mr Oettinger had said Japan was facing an "apocalypse".

1645: A spokeswoman for EU Energy Commissioner Guenther Oettinger has clarified his earlier remarks that "further catastrophic events" were expected. "He just wanted to share his concern and that he was really touched by all the images of people and the victims," said Marlene Holzner. "In this sense, he said that according to we have seen in the media, it seems that in the nuclear power plants at the moment we do not have technical control."

1640: The number of dead is expected to rise. The mayor of Ishinomaki said earlier than 10,000 people were thought to be missing in his town alone and a similar number was given in Minamisanriku.

Etc.

LIVE: Osama Bin Laden dead

BBC7-1.webp

(^ The Fukushima nuclear power complex)

1837: Gregory Jaczko, head of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has said there is no water left in the spent fuel pool in reactor four, adding: "We believe that radiation levels are extremely high." Mr Jaczko was speaking to Congress in Washington and it was not immediately clear where his information had come from.

1832: The AP news agency is quoting Tepco as saying a new power line is almost ready which could end the crisis. The disruption of power to the pumps which send coolant through the reactors is what led to their overheating.
 
Last edited:
Japan earthquake: Foreign Office updates British advice

The Foreign Office has advised Britons to consider leaving Tokyo and north-east Japan following Friday's quake, tsunami and subsequent radiation fears.

Full Story;

Japan earthquake: Britons told to consider Tokyo exit

1900: Mr Jackzo said the high radiation levels would make it very difficult for workers to get near the reactor. "The doses they could experience would potentially be lethal doses in a very short period of time," he said, but added that the NRC's information on the situation was "very limited".

1859: More from NRC chair Gregory Jaczko. He told Congress: "We believe that secondary containment has been destroyed and there is no water in the spent fuel pool and we believe that radiation levels are extremely high which could possibly impact the ability to take corrective measures."

1854: He told the BBC: "We are informed by the science, and the science says that outside the 30km exclusion zone there should not be a threat to human health. If we thought there was a threat to human health of a severe level in Tokyo we would have much stronger advice at this stage, saying that people should leave with immediate effect. What we are saying is that people should consider leaving Tokyo and northern Japan."

1853: Mr Browne said trains and planes were available at the moment for people wishing to leave, but that "if the capacity needs to be increased by the British government we will do that".

1851: UK Foreign Office minister Jeremy Browne has said the advice to British nationals is "not an order" but that given the situation "British nationals should consider leaving Tokyo and northern Japan and that the capacity exists for them to do so".

1843: White House spokesman Jay Carney has said the latest US evacuation order does not signal a lack of confidence in the Japanese authorities, AP reports. He said US officials were basing their recommendations on what they would do if such an incident happened at home, and that they had consulted with the Japanese government before issuing the advice.
 
Last edited:
Fukushima plant 16/03/11

An Aerial View of the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Situation (image taken 16/03/11);

After the earthquake and tsunami hit Japan, there have been fears of radiation leaks from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. The aerial image below, taken on 16 March 2011, clearly shows damage to three of the six reactors and smoke pouring from a fourth.

BBC8-1.webp

(Click to enlarge)

The four central reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power station were the most badly damaged by the tsunami.

Although the reactors all shut down automatically after the quake, problems soon emerged with the cooling systems that keep the fuel rods cool.

A power outage prevented nuclear workers from pumping water through the cooling system. The fuel rods overheated, causing a series of major problems.

Radiation has leaked from the plant, though it is not clear from exactly where. Reactors 2 and 3 are thought to be the most likely candidates however.

Efforts are continuing to cool the reactors to reduce the risk of any further leaks.

BBC9-1.webp

(Click to enlarge)

Reactor 1

Explosion on 12 March, ripped off roof.

Reactor 2

Explosion on 15 March, some internal damage, most likely source of radiation spike that day.

Reactor 3

Explosion on 14 March, roof damaged. Fears damage may have led to radiation spike on 16 March - although later reports said it was unclear what caused the leap in levels.

Reactor 4

Under maintenance at time of quake. At least two fires reported since.

Reactors 5 and 6

Under maintenance at time of quake. Fears overheating may lead to explosions.

Japan nuclear plant: See the damage
 
BBC News Videos 16/03/11;

"Japan earthquake: Struggle of the survivors in cold conditions";

Japan survivors struggle in the cold

"Water drop at Fukushima Daiichi power plant stopped";

Water drop at nuclear plant stopped

"Japan earthquake: Charity helping children in Japan";

'Anxiety and fear' for Japan's children

"Japan earthquake: Father's search for missing wife";

Father's search for missing wife

"Fukushima governor says Japan earthquake victims need help";

Fukushima governor: We need help

"Japan earthquake: Emperor 'deeply worried'";

Japan's emperor 'deeply worried'
 
"Nuclear crisis: Inside Fukushima's exclusion zone";

Inside Fukushima's exclusion zone

"Japan earthquake: Ofunato rescue team search for bodies";

Ofunato rescue team search for bodies

"Evacuees face food and medicine shortages in Japan";

Evacuees facing hardship in Japan

"Food shortages start to hit Japanese shops";

Basic supplies run low in Japan shops

"Japan earthquake: 'Desperate measures' to cool reactors";

Japan's battle to cool reactors

"Recovery in the stock market but life worsens around quake zone";

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/12756772
 
All our thoughts from here are constantly with everyone in Japan, from a family that hold the country and its people very dear in their hearts.

My opinion is to go. Kyoto is a long way away from the affected areas.

I think you're going to have to wait and see what's appropriate, or even possible. It's too early to plan right now I'd say.

I live in Morioka, about 150km north of Sendai. At the time of the quake, I happened to be in a conference in Downtown Sendai. After spending 4 nights in an evacuation camp, I managed to make my way back home.
During my stay in the camp, I got hired by Skynews crew as a local guide/translator, which brought me to coastal villages such as Natori, Iwanuma, Tagajo, and Sendai Port, all hard hit by the tsunami. When we visited a neighborhood of 105 families in Iwanuma, rescue workers were not there yet, as a result I had to witness unclaimed bodies while the crew filmed the place.
I worked for them because there was no gasoline in the city (unless you wait in queue a whole night), and had no means of getting out of the city to head for Morioka. So I thought I should be doing something more productive while being an evacuee myself. It turned out they were not really interested in getting the words out simply, but rather looking for "beautiful" destructions, "fantastic footage" of a grief-stricken lady looking for her 99 year old mother in the ruin.
Back in Morioka, economic activities are almost at halt, as there is simply no fuel at pumps. In Sendai, you could try waiting for 10 hours at gas stations, and you had a chance. In here, there is no chance so there is not even a queue.

Thanks a lot for posting. I'm so sorry for your situation, and dearly hope things will improve for everyone very soon. I'm also sorry to hear of the attitude of the Sky News crew, please don't think they represent the feelings of anyone else from the UK or other countries. It sounds like they were incredibly insensitive and rude.
 
Tokis my friend (long time no speak!) I know you mean the very best, but is there much point posting long lists of links that can be found on the same website? They take up so much space on the pages here, and more personal posts can be somewhat lost. Just my humble opinion (others may well disagree with me) :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom