OK, I get の then, but could you explain why に is required here?4. Think of it as the phrase 持って歩く + の + に. の here is a nominalizer, like こと.
You can also think it as 日本語・日本文化の、この十四年間の(/における/の間の)変化.2. また、この十四年間の日本語、日本文化の変化にはめざましいものがあった。
I assume this is talking about the remarkable changes that have occurred in Japanese culture and language over the fourteen years in question, but I don't really understand the grammar. How does the clause この十四年間の日本語 grammatically relate to the next part? There don't seem to be any of the linking words that I am used to seeing.
This is a widely-spread misinterpretation.;-) 連用形 is not from the word 連用する or "to use continuously", but from 用言に連なる形 as the opposite to 連体形 or 体言に連なる形.That's why it's called the 連用形.
連用形 - Wikipedia連用とは「用言に連なる」という意味であり、用言(動詞・形容詞・形容動詞)の前で現れる語形をもとに作られている。
I did read that once before, actually, but, I'm sorry, I don't fully understand it how it relates to my problem. Do you mean mean that I inadvertently inserted a half-width character somewhere in my sentence? Can you tell which character it is? And this seems to be different from saying that the forum automatically inserts a half-width space character that messes things up. If the forum does this, then will anything more than 25 characters always be messed up? If so, how is that tolerable?It's the forum that's the problem, and it's insistence on inserting a half-width space every 25 characters. Japanese text is full-width, so if a half width space will end up getting inserted in the middle of a full-width character, resulting in 窶「ツカナスナ。窶ーツサ窶堋ッ. There's a link about it in my sig.
Oh, so do you mean the half-width characters are the "1. ..." at the start of the line? I was looking for something embedded in the Japanese script.文字化け is occurred when you mix half-size fonts and full-size fonts(kana, kanji) in a paragraph.
the source of your trouble
"1. ..." + "我々の二年生のレベルで…."
You can avoid it adding a half-size space " " after the half-size font.
Toritoribe said:This is a widely-spread misinterpretation. 連用形 is not from the word 連用する or "to use continuously", but from 用言に連なる形 as the opposite to 連体形 or 体言に連なる形.
The way I understand it, though I am happy to be corrected, is that the space is always being inserted. If it gets inserted "in the middle" of a Japanese character then it messes up that character, but if it gets inserted at a character boundary then it doesn't, it just appears as a space. For some reason the character counts are being treated differently in my examples, even though the number of characters appears to be the same. This causes the space to be inserted at a different point.However, there's no space there in the last one. This difference causes something.
Oh, sorry for misunderstanding.I was actually thinking 用言に連なる形 when I wrote that, and was thinking that it was opposed to 体言に連なる形 (連体形). That's actually how I learned to keep them straight. But, I was wondering just what 用言 it was attached to. I guess it's the one at the end of the sentence, or it's the group of all of them together (although your quote says it just appears in front of another 用言). To be honest, I never learned the translation of it.
I feel a bit confused, though, because like I said, I learned it by opposing it to 連体形, so it feels like it should be modifying something, and that something would be the following phrase, or just the predicate of it. But I guess that's not quite right. Bleh, it's been a long day, and I'm tired.
Interesting. So the space is automatically inserted even in Roman letters.It occurred to me later that this probably has nothing to do with "paragraphs", but everything to do with what the software considers unbroken "words". For example, in the following it has inserted a space after 50 characters (equivalent to 25 double-width Japanese characters) in the two 60-character "words" (consisting of all digits) and left the rest alone.
aaaaaaaaaaaa 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 bbbbbbbbbbbbb cccccccccccc ddddddddddddddd 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
When it hits a bunch of Japanese with no spaces, the software probably thinks that it's all one "word" and that it needs to insert a space, probably as a kludge to allow line-wrapping to happen because the software doesn't properly handle long unbroken character strings.
It seems so. My guess is that the messed-up Japanese text is simply an unanticipated side-effect of a horrible programming hack designed to fix problems with the display of long unbroken strings of single-width characters.Interesting. So the space is automatically inserted even in Roman letters.