Thanks for your help! I think verb+ている and noun+でいる are two different constructs.maybe trying to humanize Honda a little bit by using いる
Must what is before で which is a state be a noun or a な-adjective?で is a particle to indicate a state in your example
Is な-adjective like 元気 supposed to be 元気に before the verb? Is 元気 here a state so a noun is used hence 元気で?元気で過ごしていますように
Is 元気 here a noun too, 元気で?元気でいます
Are the く-form adjectives above considered states?優しくして、激しくふり回った、潔く死んだ
As I mentioned, the use of na-adjective+で is like i-adjectives in the 〜く form, think of it more as an adverb, describing the way the verb is performed.Thanks!
Must what is before で which is a state be a noun or a な-adjective?
Is な-adjective like 元気 supposed to be 元気に before the verb? Is 元気 here a state so a noun is used hence 元気で?
Is 元気 here a noun too, 元気で?
Are the く-form adjectives above considered states?
Do you think 元気に is an adverb too?元気になる
Not in this case, it's a state you have transitioned/are transitioning into, so the directional particle is used. When you use で you are already genki, and so the action you pair with 元気で is performed with the quality of the na-adjectiveThanks!
Do you think 元気に is an adverb too?
Yes.Must what is before で which is a state be a noun or a な-adjective?
It differs depending on the relation between the verb and the word before で/に in meaning. See the following examples.Is な-adjective like 元気 supposed to be 元気に before the verb? Is 元気 here a state so a noun is used hence 元気で?
Is 元気 here a noun too, 元気で?
I have been thinking hard the difference, if any, in meaning or nuance between the choice of で and that of に especially for the same state/condition with the same verb but I fail.〇元気でいる
〇元気に過ごす
〇元気で過ごす
I don't quite follow this. Is whatever described before で, be it a noun or na-adjective, we call it a state? What do we call that is described before に? I guess what is described before でいる has to be a state and いる has to go with で. Am I correct?This is grammatical, but で is the -te form of copula here, i.e., 元気で doesn't express how/in what state the subject moves.
No, of course not. You can see the reason in the following easy-to-understand examples. (The first two are examples of "the -te form of copula", and で expresses the reason in the last one.)I don't quite follow this. Is whatever described before で, be it a noun or na-adjective, we call it a state?
It depends on the function of the word. If you are talking about 元気に過ごす or 静かに動く for example, it's usually interpreted as an adverbial form of na-adjective.What do we call that is described before に?
No. It seems to me that the key point of your confusing is that でいる is not a set expression, as I already pointed out.I guess what is described before でいる has to be a state and いる has to go with で. Am I correct?
I guess the で above is part of です, where just get truncated while in the middle of a sentence. Am I correct?彼は元気で、毎日よく動く。
彼は学生で、東京にいる。
Could 乗り継ぎ be considered as a state?彼はこの空港には乗り継ぎでいる。
I have ALWAYS taken them all as adverbs. What else could there be?it's usually interpreted as an adverbial form of na-adjective
I think you mean でいる is to be interpreted as で+ いる, not でいる altogether, so で and いる can vary with the situation in hand. Am I correct?でいる is not a set expression
In general I believe I understand how ~にいる and ~くに+verb work. It's ~で+verb which is still a puzzle to me. ~にいる as per your examples seem to indicate the whereabouts of the subject while ~でいる to me is like a state. Do I get them right?examples where に can be used with いる
×元気で動くThis is grammatical
Were you saying 元気で動く is equivalent to 元気です、動く?but で is the -te form of copula here
Re:×元気で動く元気で doesn't express how/in what state the subject moves.