Thank you. よしのん is the puppet of the 精霊 called よしの (who wears the puppet on her hand). The protagonist and よしの are in a big department store and they are talking. A troop is waiting outside. Once the 精霊 comes out, the troop will kill her.
So it's "if the troop is drawn to this world..."? I would think it means "if the troop is drawn to the department store, they will attack me immediately."
By the way, does the 出て mean "appear" (instead of "come out")?
You misinterpreted the subject of 引っ張られる and 出てくる. It's "I/we", i.e., よしのん (and よしの/ハーミット). Also, ～と conditional is more likely "when", not "if", here.
Then you should probably review the use of the conditional と. The nature of と along with the usage of the -てくる forms makes it almost impossible to interpret 出てくる and 攻撃してくる as having the same subject.
The above are just hypothetical examples where the implied subject is the same, but neither of these make logical sense, right?
The only rational interpretation is "When X is pulled from somewhere and comes out here, Y comes in and attacks them.", where X and Y (the two subjects) are different, no?
Not to put words in his mouth, but I believe Toritoribe-san's point is that the two terms are synonymous and describe the exact same action. The only difference is how you're expressing it in English.
The subject was somewhere else and now they've come out/appeared here. That's the meaning of 出る／出てくる. How you'd choose to render it in English depends on your personal preference, but surely the meaning of the verb itself is clear, no?
士道は、精霊がこの世界に現れようとする際に、空間震が起こるものと認識していたのだ。 だけれど十香の話が本当ならーーこの世界に現れることすら自分の意思ではないというとこになる。 ならば空間震というのは本当に、事故のようなものではないか。 ーーその責任までも十香に、精霊に問おうというのは、いくらなんでも理不尽に過ぎる。 Hi. Why is もの in red in used here? Can’t we use こと? Thank you.