Hi. I think we can also use さながらの in the underlined part. But I'm not sure about the さながらに. Does the の (if used) modify 剣呑 while the に modify であった?
Thank you.
While you're correct that the difference between に and の would indeed be that the former connects to a predicate and the latter to a noun, 剣呑 is a な-adjective, not a noun, so they would not be interchangeable here. (If it were 猛禽さながらの剣呑さ, or the like, that would be a different story.)
In a case where you have a noun and a predicate to connect to, a situation like the one you describe could occur, like in the following example sentence from this page:
Well, I'm not just trying to discredit or disparage your dictionary, but if you don't tell me what dictionary it is or cite any specific examples it gives showing 剣呑 used as a regular noun, there's really nothing I can say, right?
Without any specific evidence to the contrary, I'm inclined to trust the Japanese-Japanese dictionaries that specifically list the word as a 形容動詞 with 剣呑さ being the related noun form. (Which is the only usage that I have personally encountered the word as well, though again, I'm not a native speaker, so perhaps my experience is limited.)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.