Elizabeth
先輩
- 22 Apr 2003
- 9,839
- 135
The title of a new 溝口 book, "Kabukicho―Yabasa no Shinso" (Kabukicho―The Truth of Its Dangerousness). My first thought at the English was odd things that lose in translation. 
The difference between dangerousness and danger in the nominative case as I see it is that the former speaks to a quality or level of vulnerability/not being safe while 'danger' is the source of threat itself or exposure to a harmful situation.
So since they're basically interchangable but in English we talk of "Real truth of it's Dangers/Risks/Perils" and "The Truth of its Dangerousness" sounds more like criminal law texbook than anything a normal person want to run out and grab, it really would be very, very odd. Most Americans are probably not even positive that dangerousness is a valid word. The communication is transferred starkly but there is no emotion or cultural understanding behind it.
And because finding equivalents that work best in a given context is of course the essence of good translation, after that shock wore off, it made me wonder....are there any particularly critical differences in the choice of ヤブさ as opposed to much more common 危険性、あぶなさ、etc ? Does ヤバさ restore a colorfulness or even sensationalism for a naming that would otherwise feel rather cold and distant? Objectively it's a decision for those who really know the market--the editor and the author. I'm not contesting that, only asking about the connotations language-wise.
【レビュー・書評】歌舞伎町・ヤバさの真相 [著]溝口敦 - 新書の小径 - BOOK:asahi.com(朝日新聞社)
The difference between dangerousness and danger in the nominative case as I see it is that the former speaks to a quality or level of vulnerability/not being safe while 'danger' is the source of threat itself or exposure to a harmful situation.
So since they're basically interchangable but in English we talk of "Real truth of it's Dangers/Risks/Perils" and "The Truth of its Dangerousness" sounds more like criminal law texbook than anything a normal person want to run out and grab, it really would be very, very odd. Most Americans are probably not even positive that dangerousness is a valid word. The communication is transferred starkly but there is no emotion or cultural understanding behind it.
And because finding equivalents that work best in a given context is of course the essence of good translation, after that shock wore off, it made me wonder....are there any particularly critical differences in the choice of ヤブさ as opposed to much more common 危険性、あぶなさ、etc ? Does ヤバさ restore a colorfulness or even sensationalism for a naming that would otherwise feel rather cold and distant? Objectively it's a decision for those who really know the market--the editor and the author. I'm not contesting that, only asking about the connotations language-wise.
【レビュー・書評】歌舞伎町・ヤバさの真相 [著]溝口敦 - 新書の小径 - BOOK:asahi.com(朝日新聞社)