How to ask "Does that make sense?"

Ryuk

スパ外国人
Joined
25 Dec 2007
Messages
122
Reaction score
1
The title says it all really. I just want to know, when I am practicing speaking Japanese and I want to make sure I have said something correctly, is there the Japanese equivalent of "Did that make sense?"?
The first thing that would come to mind to say would be "Wakarimashita ka" but I was wondering if there is a politer way to say this.

Also, would it be correct to use "Mou ichido itte kudasai" to ask someone to repeat themselves (equivalent to "Pardon?" in English) and could this be reduced to "Mou ichido itte" if you were speaking to someone familiar?

Many thanks :-)
 
Wakarimashita ka sounds polite enough in my opinion. Can't think think of any politer way.
 
"Wakarimashitaka" is not incorrect, but it sounds as if you're questioning the listener's comprehension ability (like "do you understand?") rather than asking if your speech makes sense.
To me "wakarimasuka" would sound better. :)
 
"Wakarimashitaka" is not incorrect, but it sounds as if you're questioning the listener's comprehension ability (like "do you understand?") rather than asking if your speech makes sense.
To me "wakarimasuka" would sound better. :)
Imi ga wakarimashitaka? I think is also very clear. :-)
 
Arigatou gozaimashita :-)

Elizabeth, I like that way of putting it. I will try next time I speak to my Japanese contacts :D
 
IMHO, "wakarimashitaka," whether it is combined with "imi ga" or not, is condescending toward the listener. I wouldn't use it to my friends or family unless I'm angry or am talking as a teacher to a neophyte or a child... 😅
 
IMHO, "wakarimashitaka," whether it is combined with "imi ga" or not, is condescending toward the listener. I wouldn't use it to my friends or family unless I'm angry or am talking as a teacher to a neophyte or a child... 😌
It depends a lot on the tone but personally I think it's fine from a foreign learner. No one I've ever asked about the difference has said that they thought it was condescending.

No matter what you say, though, the answer will come back :

Imi ga wakaranai...

(Imi ga/wa) wakarimashita/wakarimasu. 😌
 
It depends a lot on the tone but personally I think it's fine from a foreign learner. No one I've ever asked about the difference has said that they thought it was condescending.

No matter what you say, though, the answer will come back :

Imi ga wakaranai...

(Imi ga/wa) wakarimashita/wakarimasu. 😌

I agree with epigene.
As mentioned earlier, whether it is the past tense or present tense makes big difference semehow.
While "wakarimasuka" sounds like asking whether the speaker is conveying the right message, "wakarimashitaka" sounds rather angry/menacing/accusing, like "did you get it?" (are you really listening? Did you really understand?, etc.)

Maybe "it is OK from a foreign learner" but I personally think it is safe to know the politer expression to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding...
😌
 
I agree with epigene.
As mentioned earlier, whether it is the past tense or present tense makes big difference semehow.
While "wakarimasuka" sounds like asking whether the speaker is conveying the right message, "wakarimashitaka" sounds rather angry/menacing/accusing, like "did you get it?" (are you really listening? Did you really understand?, etc.)

Maybe "it is OK from a foreign learner" but I personally think it is safe to know the politer expression to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding...
😌
It may be safer. It may be safer. I haven't used "(chanto) wakatta (no)??" unless it was clearly in a joke or lighthearted spirit, for instance, after it was corrected to "wakarimashitaka? or wakarimasuka?"



All I meant to put out was that the people I've asked have always said there is a very subtle difference, more dependent on the situation than the words themselves so not to worry about it and that they didn't feel offended when the context was clear (ie. from anyone concerned about their unnatural grammar). Maybe because the tone I convey is always so far from accusatory....:p
 
Last edited:
Well, people, for the most part, are forgiving of foreign speakers giving an honest effort, so they know you may have meant something else.

"Imi ga tsujimasuka?" is like when you want to make sure if the WORD/PHRASE makes sense.

"Wakarimasuka?" is like "Does that make sense to YOU"? It's relevant to one's comprehension level or depth of knowledge.

 
Well, people, for the most part, are forgiving of foreign speakers giving an honest effort, so they know you may have meant something else.
Yes, of course. Native speakers are not considering when asked that a beginner is trying to indimidate them. :p If miscommunication happens, clearly the listener in that case is never at fault.
 
意味が通じますか? imi ga tsuujimasuka?
I don't think this is right, or at least very common at all.

Maybe you were thinking of 通じますか?通じましたか?
Do/Did I make myself clear/understandable ? Still fairly odd I think.


Anyway, 通じる isn't really specific to a particular word or phrase but more like how well the person is getting through overall. :-)
 
I don't think this is right, or at least very common at all.

Maybe you were thinking of 通じますか?通じましたか?
Do/Did I make myself clear/understandable ? Still fairly odd I think.


Anyway, 通じる isn't really specific to a particular word or phrase but more like how well the person is getting through overall.
:)
I googled 意味が通じますか?:geek:

意味が通じますか - Google 検索


映画のDVDを友達の韓国人にあげようとおもいますが韓あ 糟黷フ入っているDVDを購入したいのですがis there a Korean subtitle in this dvd?で意味が通じますか

以下の英文で意味が通じますか?またはもっとわかりやすい言い方をご教授願えますで しょうか…

アジア、北米でRaamen(ラーメン)は意味が通じますか

1)の 「わたしは 彼を見た。」は、 意味的に通じますよね。 おそらく誰にとっても、この文は意味が通じるはずです 。 2)の 「わたしは 彼を作った。」は、どうでしょうか。意味が通じますか


「げんさい」「げんよう」で 意味が 通じますか
 
Last edited:
the difference between 通じますか? and 通じましたか?

通じますか?:
the form to ask if the words generally make sense or not

通じましたか?:
the form to ask if what I want to say is conveyed to you or not


自信のない表現を使ったあと、「今のは/今ので通じますか?」と聞くと「今の使い方は正しいですか?/通用しますか?」と同じ意味になり、「今のは/今ので通じましたか?」と聞くと「あなたに伝わりましたか?」と同じ意味になります。
つまり、「通じますか?」と聞かれた場合は「日本語として正しい表現かどうか」を聞かれているわけだから、表現が間違っていれば相手は例えば「こういう言い方のほうがいいですよ」という風に答えてきますし、「通じましたか?」と聞かれた場合、文法的に正しい表現じゃなくても意味が伝わってさえいれば、相手は「はい。ちゃんとわかりましたよ」という風に返事してくるでしょうね。
だからRyukさんの求める文脈だと「通じましたか?」は使えないと思います。


If I would say,

今の言い方であってますか?
Ima no iikata de attemasu ka?

今の言い方で通じますか?
Ima no iikata de tsuujimasu ka?
:)
 
Last edited:
the difference between 通じますか? and 通じましたか?
通じますか?:
the form to ask if the words generally make sense or not
通じましたか?:
the form to ask if what I want to say is conveyed to you or not
自信のない表現を使ったあと、「今のは/今ので通じますか?」と聞くと「今の使い方は正しいですか?/通用しますか?」と同じ意味になり、「今のは/今ので通じましたか?」と聞くと「あなたに伝わりましたか?」と同じ意味になります。
つまり、「通じますか?」と聞かれた場合は「日本語として正しい表現かどうか」を聞かれているわけだから、表現が間違っていれば相手は例えば「こういう言い方のほうがいいですよ」という風に答えてきますし、「通じましたか?」と聞かれた場合、文法的に正しい表現じゃなくても意味が伝わってさえいれば、相手は「はい。ちゃんとわかりましたよ」という風に返事してくるでしょうね。
だからRyukさんの求める文脈だと「通じましたか?」は使えないと思います。
If I would say,
今の言い方であってますか?
Ima no iikata de attemasu ka?
今の言い方で通じますか?
Ima no iikata de tsuujimasu ka?
:)

説明してくれてありがとうございます!今は、残念ながら、その書き込みをゆっくりと読む時間がないですけど。。。まだ、「意味が通じる」という言葉も分からないのですが。。。

書いた日本人も この表現を聞いただけで不自然というより、ちょっと変だ
といっていましたよ。 もちろん、同じような感じで使われる「言葉が通じる」はとても普通ですね。
 
the difference between 通じますか? and 通じましたか?
通じますか?:
the form to ask if the words generally make sense or not
通じましたか?:
the form to ask if what I want to say is conveyed to you or not
自信のない表現を使ったあと、「今のは/今ので通じますか?」と聞くと「今の使い方は正しいですか?/通用しますか?」と同じ意味になり、「今のは/今ので通じましたか?」と聞くと「あなたに伝わりましたか?」と同じ意味になります。
つまり、「通じますか?」と聞かれた場合は「日本語として正しい表現かどうか」を聞かれているわけだから、表現が間違っていれば相手は例えば「こういう言い方のほうがいいですよ」という風に答えてきますし、「通じましたか?」と聞かれた場合、文法的に正しい表現じゃなくても意味が伝わってさえいれば、相手は「はい。ちゃんとわかりましたよ」という風に返事してくるでしょうね。
だからRyukさんの求める文脈だと「通じましたか?」は使えないと思います。
If I would say,
今の言い方であってますか?
Ima no iikata de attemasu ka?
今の言い方で通じますか?
Ima no iikata de tsuujimasu ka?
:)
良くわかっていらっしゃいます。:-)

「通じますか」と「通じましたか」の違いは、「わかりますか」と「わかりましたか」のとほとんど同じでしょうね。その上、「わかりますか」と「わかりましたか」という二つの単語の解釈は、それが使われている文脈で決まることが出来ますね。

そして、Ryukさんの書いた文章を訂正していただく日本人だったら、「(意味は、)わかりました」、「わかります」など。。。どちらでもいえますね。

気軽な会話的表現だったら、「わかった?」を使っても良いでしょう。。。:P
 
Back
Top Bottom