- 20 Aug 2003
- 4,910
- 416
Nisei88 wrote:
pipokun wrote:
ArmandV wrote:
Pachipro wrote:
Re: Japan signing the non-discrimination treaty
I'm not avoiding what you wrote above. I simply chose to address a huge number of other points. Look at this post of mine alone. I answered four posters! Please give me a gentle nudge when I overlook some things, and I will discuss them. You make it seem like I do this a lot, when that is not the case. I visit half a dozen forums or more daily, moderate two, and hold a full-time job. I think I can be given some leeway now and then.
As to your point above, I agree. Foreigners should learn better how to conduct themselves. If you look at the history of my posts on teaching forums, you will see that I often write about how many newbies here are undisciplined hedonistic types whose attitudes put many of us more serious teachers in a bad light. As a result, many posters/flamers choose to put me down with silly-arsed nicknames and remarks about a "doom and gloom" or "negative" attitude meant to keep newcomers out of Japan.
One problem with foreigners and their poor attitudes is that they may have visions of coming here only for a year or two. They don't care about what wreckage they leave behind. Perhaps asking for more teaching qualifications would help to minimize this damage and help to promote less juvenile types. It won't eliminate it, but any reduction is welcome! Another problem is a chicken-and-the-egg thing, in that language schools here don't often want experienced teachers; they'd prefer a newcomer who is fresh from his country, whether to show a more fresh outlook on it, or just because the employer doesn't want a savvy long-termer to see through some shady contract clause. When the newbie comes, however, he gets a bad taste, may ditch the company early, and only perpetuate the feelings that foreigners are untrustworthy, so why treat them well or fairly. Is there a permanent change in sight? I don't think so. I've been posting on teaching forums for 10 years. Not much has changed for the better, and in fact, some things have gotten worse. It seems that there are more people out there who figure that they can get (and are deserved!!) teaching jobs by sheer virtue of their native English speaking ability. Yeah, right.
Have a good break. I'll be working most of the time.
Right. I agree. But, you can use the laws as a starting point to educate people, and that may eventually change their minds. Even if it doesn't, it is a step towards recognizing human rights beyond just signing a treaty and ignoring it thereafter.You can not legislate out racism.
pipokun wrote:
The plaintiffs I do not know, other than know OF Debitou Arudou, and you would have to speak to him to decide whether he is "happy" or not. After all, he has become naturalized. As for no "serious hate crime", I might agree with that, but you would have to define it.The plaintiffs, presumably they are happy to live here even as a political/cultural supporter or dissident, are the good example that no serious hate crime is here.
ArmandV wrote:
We are humans who deserve human rights and fairness, especially from a country that outwardly claims to support both. (Don't give me the tatemae and honne jazz, either. Japan needs to be held accountable for its actions.)This sign is very common in the U.S. So, to play Devil's Advocate, who are we (Americans) to complain about Japanese discriminatory practices?
Pachipro wrote:
The fact that people put us signs by and of itself is not a legal ethic or an established right for them to do so. Secondly, many of the implications behind those signs is that they reserve the right to refuse people with bad manners or reputations in that particular establishment, not people based on their nationality. Even in the US, you'll catch legal flak for that sort of stuff!Then, as Tokapi mentioned above, how do you explain the signs in US establishments that say, "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone? It is their right as business owners IMO.
Ban all foreigners because only one bunch caused problems? Racial profiling at its finest. The law saw things otherwise, thankfully, so you should take heed of that. It's your choice to walk the other way and ignore the problem, too. If everyone did that, the problem would stay buried and never have attention drawn to it, and never stand a chance of being defeated.To stop further trouble, it is probably best that they ban all foreigners as many do not understand the customs. Again, I say it is their right. So what if they lost? Big deal. I wouldn't patronize that place anyway. It's not as if that's the only onsen in Hokkaido.
Re: Japan signing the non-discrimination treaty
And this makes it all right? Stupid reasoning. Signatures on treaties mean nothing? That's your opinion, and I politely disagree. Hold Japan accountable, or live with the problem (and to heck with ya when you face it).So what? The US, among many others, signed the Geneva Convention and still torture goes on.
No I don't. You go ahead.Name one country on the face of the planet that does not discriminate in one way or another. One just has to learn to live with it
Good, because you would lose. Yes, I'm white, but there are plenty of white people fighting discrimination problems for themselves as well as for non-whites.It's funny how the white man, who receives the least discrimination of all the races, cries bloody hell when he experiences it in a foreign country and demands that they change while denying that it exists in his own country or that a treaty was signed. (I'm not pointing a finger at you Glenski).
The tattoo issue stems from yakuza influence. Refusing to serve people under 30 is astonishing (whatever the business may be; can you elaborate). And, I can sympathize with apartment owners refusing service to college kids. The fact that all of these exist does not justify them. Racial discrimination is a more powerful thing, so it gets more attention.I've seen places/signs that refuse entry to ANYONE wearing a tatoo. I know of business establishments that will refuse service to people under 30 or to other than salarymen; I know of apartment complexes that will refuse to rent to college students. It exists in Japan for the Japanese also if you look hard enough.
Good, and if they ask to see your passport, I hope you refuse because they are not legally obligated to ask you for it. Please be sure to report on this. Don't let them tell you otherwise. It's a pile of manure.I also made my own reservation, in my own gaijin name, at an Onsen in Atami in English (and not one that foreigners frequent) and had no problem.
Pachipro,Glenski, I find it very interesting and revealing how you pick and choose things to argue about while completely ignoring and not commenting on the other aspects of the debate that one makes, such as my last paragraph above:
Originally Posted by Pachipro
If foreigners want this discrimination to decrease, maybe they should learn how to conduct themselves in public or in their apartments/houses and learn a little about the customs and languages. Then and ONLY then may change take place. After all, who would want to lose business and money even from foreigners? It is only based on their experience that they probably realize that they will lose more money (in the long run) and customers by allowing the rowdy and rude foreigner in. It's a matter of business.
I'm not avoiding what you wrote above. I simply chose to address a huge number of other points. Look at this post of mine alone. I answered four posters! Please give me a gentle nudge when I overlook some things, and I will discuss them. You make it seem like I do this a lot, when that is not the case. I visit half a dozen forums or more daily, moderate two, and hold a full-time job. I think I can be given some leeway now and then.
As to your point above, I agree. Foreigners should learn better how to conduct themselves. If you look at the history of my posts on teaching forums, you will see that I often write about how many newbies here are undisciplined hedonistic types whose attitudes put many of us more serious teachers in a bad light. As a result, many posters/flamers choose to put me down with silly-arsed nicknames and remarks about a "doom and gloom" or "negative" attitude meant to keep newcomers out of Japan.
One problem with foreigners and their poor attitudes is that they may have visions of coming here only for a year or two. They don't care about what wreckage they leave behind. Perhaps asking for more teaching qualifications would help to minimize this damage and help to promote less juvenile types. It won't eliminate it, but any reduction is welcome! Another problem is a chicken-and-the-egg thing, in that language schools here don't often want experienced teachers; they'd prefer a newcomer who is fresh from his country, whether to show a more fresh outlook on it, or just because the employer doesn't want a savvy long-termer to see through some shady contract clause. When the newbie comes, however, he gets a bad taste, may ditch the company early, and only perpetuate the feelings that foreigners are untrustworthy, so why treat them well or fairly. Is there a permanent change in sight? I don't think so. I've been posting on teaching forums for 10 years. Not much has changed for the better, and in fact, some things have gotten worse. It seems that there are more people out there who figure that they can get (and are deserved!!) teaching jobs by sheer virtue of their native English speaking ability. Yeah, right.
Have a good break. I'll be working most of the time.