Brooker said:bossel wrote....
Also, the official name of Mexico is "Los Estados Unidos de Mexico" which means "The United States of Mexico" because Mexico is also made up of many states. So it could also be accurate to call Mexico "The United States".
Weird, huh?
As for the reading of Paris Fr. /pari/ ~Eng. /pae'r@s/, couldn't it be the case that the borrowing of the place name 'Paris' occurred before French underwent the change in speech habit of muting stops and fricatives in the word-final position ? Or that since the Norman French were established a tradition of enunciation took root thus disregarding the innovations experienced by Parisian French later ? (When did the final stops/fricatives become mute actually ?)ToMach said:In general, for the names of forign places, we should consider 4 categories:
1) Ancient names with a history behind it : names borrowed at ancient times, when maybe the original name was more or less different. This is the case of English names for Korea, Japan, China, etc.
2) More recent borrowings, which underwent a process of adaptation : some words cannot be correctly pronounced by the speakers of the borrowing language, or they are reshaped to meet the rules of one language. This is why a lot of places end in -ia in English
3) Spelling pronunciations : place names are read with the rules of the borrowing language. For example, Paris is read in English as it is spelled, "parisss", but the original pronunciation is "pari". See also "Mexico".
4) New creations, like "Indonesia", "Micronesia", "Australia", "America".
Of course some place names can combine these processes.
Forgive me if I'm wide of the mark here, but it's always been my understanding that the Japanese were trying to pronounce "English", not "England" when they created the word "igirisu". This would certainly be more plausible given that the sound is much closer.Brooker said:Once again, that's the best pronunciation the Japanese could come up with using their alphabet and it's still obvious that they were making an effort to pronounce "England".
Silverpoint said:The real problem with "igirisu" is that it is freely used by Japanese people to mean England, Great Britain or the United Kingdom, all of which of course are different entities. However, this is not a problem which is limited to Japan. The majority of people from other countries (including English speaking countries such as the US or Australia) don't seem to know the difference either.
Just a little fact for you. the official title for the UK ("The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland") is the third longest country title in the world. The one with the longest is Libya which is:Silverpoint said:The difference between Great Britain and the UK? That's correct yes. Although most people refer to us as British, for many official purposes, UK is used. For what its worth the full name of our country as it appears on my passport is "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"
On September 4, 1781, the Pobladores, a group of 12 families - 46 men, women and children led by Captain Rivera y Moncada - established a community in the area discovered by Portola, and named it El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reyna de Los Angeles de Porciuncula, after the nearby river. Over time, the area became known as the Ciudad de Los Angeles, "City of Angels," and on April 4, 1850 became the City of Los Angeles.
I usually refer to the USA as the US, but I am guilty of refering to US citizens as Americans. What would you prefer Americans or United Statians, or even Statians. Look on the bright side, I read that the early congress once debated to use Freedonia, then you would be Freedonians or freedishBrooker said:On a bit of a tangent... I always thought it was strange that America doesn't really have a name, it has more of a description. For example, Canada, Panama, those are names just like Steve or Bill, but U.S.A. just means that we have (50) states, which are united, and we're in the continent of America.
Also, the official name of Mexico is "Los Estados Unidos de Mexico" which means "The United States of Mexico" because Mexico is also made up of many states. So it could also be accurate to call Mexico "The United States".
Weird, huh?
Igirisu is a Japanese attempt at pronouncing the Portuguese word "Inglez."Silverpoint said:Forgive me if I'm wide of the mark here, but it's always been my understanding that the Japanese were trying to pronounce "English", not "England" when they created the word "igirisu".
There's a big difference. One is a huge landmass occupying two continents, the other is a country within that landmass. I try to make it a point to refer to my home country as ニ但ニ陳?椎?ニ谷ツ坂?。ツ衆ツ坂? whenever it won't get in the way of the conversation. Unfortunately for the time being, "American" is the only reasonable word for someone from the US and it will have to serve the dual purpose of meaning "americano" and "estadounidense."I remember some Japanese people being confused about the difference between America and The United States, when, for practical purposes, there is no difference, but I can see how it's a little unclear. It's just two versions of the same full name, "The United States of America."
At least japan has a name for England, I've yet to meet a Japanese who knew of scotland or even what to call it....i guess we get lumped together in Ingirisu.senseiman said:I think it is an interesting subject too. There are a lot of interesting historical connections that explain how countries are called in different langauges.
The Japanese do this just as much as anybody else too. The Japanese word for England is "Igirisu", which doesn't even come close. I don't see the big deal. The very name of my home country (Canada) comes from a similar mistake, it was the name of a small Algonquin (I think) village that some early Europeans mistook for the name of the entire land.
If we all used standardized "correct" names for each others countries around the world I think we would all be loosing an interesting part of our linguistic heritage.