Japan and the United States agreed in 2004 to return the area, and the handover of the entire district was completed on June 30. Yokohama City has outlined plans for the former site, including attracting university research facilities and developing park space.
A total of about 1,200 hectares of land in Yokohama, including central areas, had been confiscated by the GHQ, which the local government has blamed for hindering the port city's development. Among areas already returned is the Kamiseya communications site spanning about 242 hectares that came back in 2015. Defense Minister Shinichiro Koizumi hailed the "historic significance" of the move, telling a press conference that he hopes the Negishi site will be used efficiently by the local community. Yokohama is considering using the land for a university medical school, research facilities and housing. The site is a mixture of state- and privately owned land, and the land development project is expected to take at least a decade to finish. Calling the land return the city's "long-held wish," the Yokohama mayor said his government hopes to meet residents' expectations and accelerate efforts to utilize the area.
Honestly. Its quite the opposite. Trump think USA spend more on defending other countries, than they get money in return, when it comes to US military. So the idea of countries needing to be less dependant on US military. Or at best pay USA? Is likely a good outcome for himGood thing Trump didn't get wind of that. He'd have tried to stop it and make plans for Trump branded towers and golf courses.
Giving up anything of value -- even if he has no rights to it -- is not something Trump would normally do. That's why I suggested he would normally prefer to keep it or somehow get Japan to pay him for it. Look at what he tried to do with the new Detroit-Windsor Bridge by demanding that the U.S. should own half of it despite it being entirely funded by Canada and all ownership/operational agreements having been made years ago. Or look at the Greenland fiasco.Honestly. Its quite the opposite. Trump think USA spend more on defending other countries, than they get money in return, when it comes to US military. So the idea of countries needing to be less dependant on US military. Or at best pay USA? Is likely a good outcome for him
I can see your point.Giving up anything of value -- even if he has no rights to it -- is not something Trump would normally do. That's why I suggested he would normally prefer to keep it or somehow get Japan to pay him for it. Look at what he tried to do with the new Detroit-Windsor Bridge by demanding that the U.S. should own half of it despite it being entirely funded by Canada and all ownership/operational agreements having been made years ago. Or look at the Greenland fiasco.
Wait.. waaait, Frank you were a spy??Brings back memories of when they closed my spy base in Fukuoka in 1972. It seemed fitting they turned part of the base into an amusement park.
How did they find out all that?? Isn't that stuff super classified and limited to very few people? Also, why would they do that in the first place, were they really that clueless? Or was it done on purpose by someone with a grudge against US bases on Japanese soil?I think it was "The Japan Times" newspaper that was printed in English back then. They shocked our security system with a 4 page article on Hakata Base's spy works. It named officers names. It gave exact info on what equipment we used. It gave our shift schedules and explained the different buildings and what they did. The article was like the NSA published it , it was so detailed with true info.
How did they find out all that?? Isn't that stuff super classified and limited to very few people?