The results will be converted to a score of 20, which is included in the overall score of 1,020 in the spring's entrance exams for Tokyo metropolitan high schools.
Is that better, worse, or just as bad as everyone being the "same" for everything. What I have seen with my kids in school, here in the US, is that everyone has to be the same. Those who made the effort and those who didn't. No one "wins" or "loses" anything anymore, its medals/awards for everyone. I'm not convinced that is a better situation.The obsession over measuring performance through tests and using it to separate kids into winners and losers is driving people mad.
I do wonder how that would be graded. There is so much room for interpretation/inference there.I wonder if you get bonus points for creativity.
View attachment 91416
"I was going to practice playing the piano. So I went to get my favorite songbook of Marilyn Manson ballads.
I couldn't find it at first but suddenly an evil spirit pushed it so that it fell on my head.
If that wasn't strange enough, when I opened it I found that it contains hardcore pornography that my brother must have hidden in there."
College seems like a better place to have the test in the first place. Or at the end of high school at least.It should be pointed out that attempts have also been made to include English speaking tests in entrance exams at the college level, but these attempts have all been defeated so far.
'Stop messing around': Japan univ. test takers express rage, joy over shelved English tests
"TOKYO -- Many youths voiced anger and confusion after the education ministry abruptly announced on Nov. 1 that the introduction of private English tests to university entrance exams would be postponed, while some expressed relief."
(cont.)
'Stop messing around': Japan univ. test takers express rage, joy over shelved English tests - The Mainichi
TOKYO -- Many youths voiced anger and confusion after the education ministry abruptly announced on Nov. 1 that the introduction of private English tesmainichi.jp
I'm guessing the ones who expressed rage are the ones who spent a million yen on private English lessons to prepare.It should be pointed out that attempts have also been made to include English speaking tests in entrance exams at the college level, but these attempts have all been defeated so far.
'Stop messing around': Japan univ. test takers express rage, joy over shelved English tests
"TOKYO -- Many youths voiced anger and confusion after the education ministry abruptly announced on Nov. 1 that the introduction of private English tests to university entrance exams would be postponed, while some expressed relief."
(cont.)
'Stop messing around': Japan univ. test takers express rage, joy over shelved English tests - The Mainichi
TOKYO -- Many youths voiced anger and confusion after the education ministry abruptly announced on Nov. 1 that the introduction of private English tesmainichi.jp
College seems like a better place to have the test in the first place. Or at the end of high school at least.
In the U.S. we have regular standardized testing but it's only to benchmark where students are at, not as a gate to get into high school.It is a fascinating question, whether suddenly introducing an English speaking test is more 'fair' if it is done at the high school or college level. But the real issue goes much deeper.
I have seen this a few times, where a college's English teaching is a disaster, based on disastrous policies at the government and society level. (The same thing is happening, to a lesser extent, in colleges and high schools in China.) One way that schools choose to 'deal' with such a disaster is to suddenly throw a test at it, not giving students enough time to prepare for it, and not making any attempt to link the test to ongoing curriculum. The idea is to use such a test to evaluate how well specific language objectives are being taught in the school's curriculum, but this is definitely not what happened to the 67,000 middle school students in Tokyo, without any warning and without giving them any time to get ready. Japan needs to look at how its English curriculum is failing its students, put together a new curriculum to fix the problem, then evaluate how well the new curriculum is working, not the other other way around. "Bad curriculum? We'll just throw another test at the students, then it's up to the students to figure out what to do."
Another thing is to 'grandfather' everyone already in the system. Japan needs to start with clear English speaking objectives for today's elementary school first graders and work with them as they grow up going through various grades, not suddenly dump this on today's ninth graders without any warning.
Of course, none of this will happen in Japan, and things will continue to get worse, not better.
Singapore is multicultural though so they need a lingua franca and English makes a lot of sense.For example, Singapore is well-known for having the best EFL programs of any country in Asia. What is Singapore doing right? Can Singaporean ideas be successfully used in Japan? Can teaching ideas from America, Europe, etc., be used in Japan? The research and implementation just hasn't been done.
True but there's a lot more opportunity to get exposure to English in Japan than, say, French in the U.S. Also I think they get six years of English and even get some exposure in elementary school don't they? My current company was a domestic-focused company that bought a U.S. company. So it has many people who surprisingly are not equipped to work in English even in written form. Some of them literally write in Japanese and convert to English using DeepL or something in order to communicate by email. Lucky for them online translation is pretty decent these days. Of course it's helpful for me too. But if I'm writing to them in Japanese, I usually write in Japanese first and then auto-translate to English to confirm the meaning is what I intended.I also find language teaching in the US to be terrible. I took 5 years of French but did not come out near fluent in French. I also had Chinese and that was not great either. I guess the difference is English being the international language we don't feel we need to teach other languages to any usable level as we expect everyone to speak to us in English. My Japanese actually came from a private tutor myself and another at my company way back when used that was of course very different than a classroom setting. In the end I guess I want to say language teaching is no better in US schools.
In my view, Japan cannot get rid of the weakness about spoken Japanese till they depend on Katakana for English words. Just my two centsAn attempt is being made to include an English speaking test in a high school entrance exam in Tokyo. Some parents are not happy. (It will become just one more thing to spend more money on for juku classes.) This could have huge implications for the English-teaching industry in Japan.
FOCUS: Trial of English-speaking test for Tokyo high schools raises eyebrows
"A private-sector English-speaking test will be introduced at the Tokyo metropolitan high school entrance exam for the first time in Japan this month, but the initiative to nurture "speaking skills" faces stiff opposition from some parents and education experts questioning its fairness.
"The test will be implemented for the entrance exam on Nov. 27, targeting almost 80,000 third-year middle school students in the capital who wish to attend metropolitan high schools from next April. Speaking test scores will be added to the overall scores of the entrance exams, being held next February.
"Some parents and experts are demanding that the test be called off due to the need for more transparency on who will score it and the standard for deducting points.
"Meanwhile, some junior high school classes in Tokyo have started preparing for the speaking test. In mid-October, third-year students at Konan Junior High School took part in improvised skits in English."
(cont.)
FOCUS: Trial of English-speaking test for Tokyo high schools raises eyebrows
A private-sector English-speaking test will be introduced at the Tokyo metropolitan high school entrance exam for the first time in Japan this month, but the initiative to nurture "speaking skills" faces stiff opposition from some parents and education experts questioning its fairness.english.kyodonews.net
Oops, I meant spoken English.In my view, Japan cannot get rid of the weakness about spoken Japanese till they depend on Katakana for English words. Just my two cents
I agree entirely. I'm learning Welsh at the moment, which is a difficult language to pronounce for English speakers, containing many sounds that don't appear in English.In my view, Japan cannot get rid of the weakness about spoken Japanese till they depend on Katakana for English words. Just my two cents