I believe its' still "aoi" for 'Aoi desu' (or in a question form, 'Aoi desu ka').
For colors especially, 'i' must be added since colors describe something. The only exception I know of is "midori" wich already has an 'i', so no extra 'i' is added.
In Japanese, the four colors (赤[aka], 青[ao], 黒[kuro], 白[shiro]) are special. They are nouns, and can be used as i-adjectives, too. Also, 黄色[kiiro] "yellow" and 茶色[chairo] "brown" can act as i-adjectives as well only when with 色[iro.]
So, both "aoi desu" and "ao desu" are correct.
as a noun:
その車は何色ですか?[Sono kuruma wa nani iro desu ka?]
What's the color of the car?
青です。[Ao desu.]
It's blue.
as an i-adjective:
その車は青いです。[Sono kuruma wa aoi desu.]
The car is blue.
Yes. As I wrote in my previous post, they (akai, aoi, kuroi, shiroi, kiiroi, chairoi) are all i-adjectives. So, of course, they conjugate as i-adjectives like "akai," "akakunai," "akakatta," "akakereba"...
みどり doesn't have an い, actually. This is one of the dangers of using rômaji. Remember that consonants must be followed by a vowel in Japanese (with the exception of the very exceptional ん), so there is no Japanese equivalent of "m" or "r," for example.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.