- 8 Mar 2005
- 2,139
- 89
Yes, and what does this have to do with Asylum? Oh yes, Asylum seekers are simply criminals... I'll tell that to the fellow I know whose children are dead in Iraq because a bomb fell upon his house... I know he WOULDN'T be welcome in Japan.No doubt that the Japanese should be less discriminatory to foreigners.
I beg YOU to procure the source of any sort of data, study, or essay, even a rant that suggests this somewhere, anywhere... Just who is wanting them to be multi-cultural "new york"...? I'll remind you, when you walk off the plane in New York, Japanese or not, English speaking or not, and you begin living in New York--- you're considered a "New Yorker"... quite the contrast to how foreigners are treated in Japan.But I beg to differ with you … some people are asking them to become merely another multi cultural new york.
The problem is, that you don't seem to be understanding what complaints there are that people are actually levying.... You think that people want Japan to be one big melting pot, and by far, I've seen the opposite rant, that Japan is becoming "Too Westernized", and this is from foreigners...My feeling is that this would so change the character of japan that it would not be a good thing. But The japanese can decide for themsleves ...
How is the equitable treatment of legal foreigners in Japan NOT my business...? Nobody is asking Japan to let MORE foreigners in, just to treat the ones there in a fashion that respects their attempts at become a part of Japanese society... and further and to the main point of this thread, to accept asylum seekers, even if to Japan, they are simply unwanted as an undesirable race.I find westerners who criticize them for not doing so extremely arrogent and I feel they need to be taken down a notch or two for meddling in things which they have no business.
In short, nobody has ever said this, in the history of anything I've read on the problems of discrimination and immigration in Japan... it's just an utter falsehood, much like the majority of your assumptions.In short, if the japanese wish to become like multicultural new york that is their business -- but it is not ours.
Yes, and what does this have to do with Asylum? Oh yes, Asylum seekers are simply criminals... I'll tell that to the fellow I know whose children are dead in Iraq because a bomb fell upon his house... I know he WOULDN'T be welcome in Japan.
I beg YOU to procure the source of any sort of data, study, or essay, even a rant that suggests this somewhere, anywhere... Just who is wanting them to be multi-cultural "new york"...? I'll remind you, when you walk off the plane in New York, Japanese or not, English speaking or not, and you begin living in New York--- you're considered a "New Yorker"... quite the contrast to how foreigners are treated in Japan.
The problem is, that you don't seem to be understanding what complaints there are that people are actually levying.... You think that people want Japan to be one big melting pot, and by far, I've seen the opposite rant, that Japan is becoming "Too Westernized", and this is from foreigners...
How is the equitable treatment of legal foreigners in Japan NOT my business...? Nobody is asking Japan to let MORE foreigners in, just to treat the ones there in a fashion that respects their attempts at become a part of Japanese society... and further and to the main point of this thread, to accept asylum seekers, even if to Japan, they are simply unwanted as an undesirable race.
In short, nobody has ever said this, in the history of anything I've read on the problems of discrimination and immigration in Japan... it's just an utter falsehood, much like the majority of your assumptions.
No, it's not. There aren't millions of asylum seekers... there aren't millions of immigrants either... the society isn't set at 99% Japanese, 1% foreign (the bulk of which are Asian), for no particular reason.Whether you call it immigration or asylum is mere semantics.
No, it's not. There aren't millions of asylum seekers... there aren't millions of immigrants either... the society isn't set at 99% Japanese, 1% foreign (the bulk of which are Asian), for no particular reason.
They're firm on Immigration (which is their business), and rank poorly on Asylum issues, you have to get these two very distinct words seperate... I don't know why you can't see this.
Immigrant = Someone who may be skilled or unskilled who wished to migrate to a perspective country to better their financial situation, or simply because they wish to enjoy the benefits (whatever they see them to be) of a particular country, etc...
Asylum Seeker = Someone who's life and the lives possibly of his or her family are in grievous danger should he or she remain in his or her own country who seek refuge from possible death or torture should they remain in their own country.
It's very simple. And there are millions of neither.
That unlivable America is much more confortable than present Japan.
The people who have presided over the disintegration of America's schools have been the "western liberal humanists" and their programmes. They have been firmly in charge for 50 years. These would be the same people who would have a mindset that Japan needs to accept millions of immigrants and assylum seekers from around the world-- is it any wonder I am sceptical ?
Many people could disagree with me, but an example is the overwork culture. These people work a whole lot of time and the new iniciative to once again increase the school week to 6 days a go certainly does not help. Japanese are humans, and humans have a boiling point and it's no wonder the pressure is the cause of many suicides among other social ills
It's too early to discuss immigration policy of Japan because Japan is already enough populous with some 130 million inhabitants.
It is true that Japan is fastest ageing country and labor shortage may become more serious. BUT Japan is developing more intelligent robots, which may replace manual labor. I personally believe that some 50 million people are enough for this tiny islands, and Japanese should use more robots than human being to maintain our economic prosperity.
lol ....
Good lord,bumped an old thread to vent.
Apparently,U only come here to whine about America is gradually becoming a third-worlder populated country ( me,agree tho ).If so discontent with present living situations in America,WHY NOT emigrate elsewhere
3 out of 10 national top high schools are in California.
It's too early to discuss immigration policy of Japan because Japan is already enough populous with some 130 million inhabitants.
Japan really is overpopulated as it isツ… a decline of 20, 30 even 40 million would not be disastrous if you focused on bringing out quality from your people.
Not "may", but will. This has already been reported by many sources, so to brush it aside as a "maybe" is just putting on blinders to reality.It is true that Japan is fastest ageing country and labor shortage may become more serious.
Automation helps and is on the rise, but we don't live in the world of Star Trek or The Jetsons. Farming is a serious concern as much (or more so) as industry, and automation is not destined to improve the situation there with the population demographics going the way they are.Japanese should use more robots than human being to maintain our economic prosperity.
Well, yes, but history has shown this not to be the case, especially in recent years. "Japan, Inc." is not alive and well anymore.if you focused on bringing out quality from your people...
Look around! Japan is already a NY in a sense with the immigrants brought in (often illegally) to do precisely that dirty work!I doubt she [Japan] needs to turn into a new york city so that the ツ"dirty workツ" gets done.
Many of the older population feel that way, especially those in the inbred halls of government. But it is rapidly becoming more than a mere matter of choice.I however think the japanese people should be able to choose whether they want a multi-cultural multi ethnic society... if so then fine ... but it is not our place to tell the japanese what they need to do. My feeling is that the majority of the japanese people do not want it which I think is a perfectly legitimate choice.
I think that the problem of the population decline has nothing to do with immigration
it is kind of propaganda..
today, populationツ is not equal to power of country.
I think As for the Japanese population, the present half is proper.
Well, economists and politicians around the world disagree with you. Immigration is not the whole issue, but it is definitely the one most people focus on.I think that the problem of the population decline has nothing to do with immigration
Thankfully, this is not colonialist times, or countries nearby would be in fear of the so-called peaceful Japan mentioned earlier (here or on another similar thread). However, if there is no one at the wheels of corporate industry because the number of people is so low, how can you even have any trade running?It is not the time of colonialisim, but the time of globalization & free trade.
Gee, if you don't like it there, to use your own words, why don't you leave?In the USA we are stuck in vicious circle of political correctness and we are diluting what our country was founded on. It's not a melting pot and never will be one. That's a myth and it wouldn't happen in Japan.
IMO, and in the opinion of many, the problem with the above notion stems from politicians and the police. It's widely known that the police publish skewed reports about foreign crime (presumably to get more money for their own coffers), and this horrific advertising every year (or is it twice a year?) http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20031231b3.html .I know there is a resistance of change and conflict but, honestly, is Japan such a delicate flower that they would crumble and die at the first major conflict? Methinks not. The only problem really lies with the Japanese people themselves. I don't know what they've seen of the US or Canada that makes them so scared of turning into a multi-cultural society (maybe someone living in Japan could tell me) but I'm sure that wont be the case.
Gee, if you don't like it there, to use your own words, why don't you leave?
As for melting pot, I'm curious as to why you think the USA is not one. What support do you have for that?
Thankfully, this is not colonialist times, or countries nearby would be in fear of the so-called peaceful Japan mentioned earlier (here or on another similar thread). However, if there is no one at the wheels of corporate industry because the number of people is so low, how can you even have any trade running?
Just what is globalization to you, Astroboy?
US is not a melting pot. You have big getthoes where African Americans live in 3rd world conditions with a soaring crime rate. US prisons is over populated by African Americans and Latinos. It is not a melting pot at all. Each ethnicity live in their getthoes.
It would be better to compare Japan to an European country because both Japan and Europe is populated by more or less by the indegenous people where as US killed most of the indegenous people and was founded by immigrants. Japan, Europe have more than 1000 years of history. Anyhow. In Europe people are complaining about too many immigrants already. I have a feeling that Americans are more open to immigrants than both Europe and Japan maybe...? this is due to the fact that the country is founded by immigrants.
If this trend continues there will be no people left in Japan but this means that this trend has to continue for a couple of centuries so Japan will manage with or without immigrants. It should be up to Japan to decide when and how many they should take and US should most certainly not be a model to follow.
Globalization to me is when a country wages war on countries to be able to rape the country for natural resources.