These people/men aren't just rare, they are quite numerous.) and don't see the hypocrisy in preaching multiculturalism and open borders while at the same time having been drawn to a foreign country because of the country's unique ethnic character traits.
What the hell? Just because a man may move to non-multicultural country does not not mean he has rejected multiculturalism!
There are many things I enjoy about Japan, but its points of insularity I do not. Not to say Japan is totally insular now or ever has been. But where they are I tend to disagree.
For example, they decided to attempt a sort of insular multiculturalism by opening the door to Japanese descended Brazilians (blood and DNA) rather than open the door to people based on their individual merit. It did not work out too well. Just another fine example of how racial and ethnic purists are dumb.
---------- Post added at 16:14 ---------- Previous post was at 16:02 ----------
I have read many articles in japanese by japanese about the japanization of american, european and chinese culture for example and how it's not the same as just pouring in a lot arabs and letting them do whatever they want. You can't fool me that Japan is similar to Europe in terms of irresponsible multiculturalism.
Well I cannot deny that Europe foolishly opened a floodgate of ill-advised immigration with a sort of starry-eyed hippie zeal.
I wish you would focus more on that being the problem than all this stuff about Muslims and gay rape. Its just that the M.E. and North Africa are culturally very different from Europeans and you cannot absorb hoards of them overnight and expect a smooth transition.
Also most importantly, Japan does not accept refugees from for example Somalia and Syria. This is a huge difference. These refugees are thrashing Sweden.
Well I don't know about Sweden getting thrashed. But I do agree that refugee policies need adjustment. Refugees should be accepted only if said refugees agree to certain terms and obligations. And I don't mean things that could get them arrested. I mean just swearing them to certain oaths, such as to uphold principles of church and state, to attempt to integrate, to accept that the country granting them refuge can and is doing so because said country embraces principles their home country does not, and to never attempt to deny their children from integrating or inter-marrying.
On many points, if people just cannot accept the backwardness of their own culture and country that led to their own refugee status, they should simply stay home.
I consider myself a sort of refugee from America!
---------- Post added at 16:28 ---------- Previous post was at 16:14 ----------
As for the middle easterners. I just don't like their behaviour, and the hypocrite gaybashing/male-on-male sex-combo is part of what annoys me.
As well it should, if it exists, to the degree you seem to want us to believe it exists. You have definitely not proved your case in my mind.
Mostly what I see is such backwardness on the subject that its less like any sort of intentional hypocrisy and more a jumbled mess of poorly constructed conceptualizations the matter. Of course that means conflicts and hypocrisy too, but its much more than that. Its like their heart and mind are not in the debate about these things at all, because their mind was already made up for them by their holy book. But rigid adherence to their holy book would lead to widespread injustice and contempt of the book and ultimately to chaos. So thought and reality don't quite match, but there is no heart to fix it.
But you have not proven your case very well and you have exaggerated so many things. Using words like "exterminate" for example.
---------- Post added at 16:41 ---------- Previous post was at 16:28 ----------
If you want some M.E. and North African hypocrisy, one that strikes me is the insistence that girls be virgins until married (and I have heard very, very harsh opinions from them on this) yet men don't need to be virgins.
One has to be very very whacked out of his own skull to not see what will be the real world results of such a conflicted policy, and yeah, one of them may well be more frequent cases of male homosexual activity (including rape) since women have more sexual restrictions placed on them and men are freer.