With 時 vs 時間, there is room for interpretation, especially depending on the context of what the original poster was trying to say. But I still think that if you are going for the strict concept of "time", then 時 is your best bet, especially in the context of a name or title.時 is normally more like "when" or "the time that..." as "point/moment in time or in life." Are you thinking of a particular set phrase it can be put into like "Time flies like an arrow" 「(時、時間はやのように過ぎ去る」...but even that is slightly unnatural.
時間 expressions of the concept of time are more wider ranging it seems to me. (Time is precious, don't waste time, make time, spend time...etc).
I would just use the normal 知識 which represents purely awareness /understanding/familiarity of a subject area(s) without overtones of other aspects such as wisdom and intelligence etc. Perhaps 学問 for academic scholarship or learning.
☝Could it be this one? 忍 It would be close to "bear" in the verb sense.
Do you have an example of how 時 could be brought into such a context ?With 時 vs 時間, there is room for interpretation, especially depending on the context of what the original poster was trying to say. But I still think that if you are going for the strict concept of "time", then 時 is your best bet, especially in the context of a name or title.
As I said originally, 時間 often refers to a slice of "time", such as in how long it takes to do something. This applies to the examples you gave: time is precious, don't waste time, make time, spend time...etc. So if you are trying to point out time as an idea, then 時 is a bit more appropriate.
Wisdom is not the same as knowledge, though. And 知識 can work as a broad statement of fact to describe a target state (person situation /concept) without being modified or limited to a particular function or area of understanding. 彼は非常に知識のある人、わずかな知識は危険なものである、And I don't think 知識 or 学問 are going to work in the context of the poster's text. 知識 alone doesn't stand very strong compared to 知恵, which flat-out means wisdom or knowledge. 知識 often requires a bit of context ("technical knowledge", "knowledge to accomplish tasks A and B", etc), but 知恵 stands strong on its own. And 学問 leans much closer to academics or a trade than pure knowledge.
Sure.Do you have an example of how 時 could be brought into such a context ?
In this case, 時間 is used for the scientific notion of time (contrasting with space). 時の物理学 sounds wrong because it is incorrect.時間の物理学 (The physics of time). Looking at it in isolation, 時の物理学 doesn't make sense to me in the same way at all.
We certainly make a distinction between these in English, but can we instantly assume that when translating the same distinction can--or even should--be made?Wisdom is not the same as knowledge, though.
☝
That would be it...hm,I typed in shino and shinobu and that wasn't an option
so that one does mean "bear" in the sense of "to bear a burden"?
thank you for the help
Although I believe for most, if not all, of these expressions 時間 is either more common than 時 or a very close second.Sure.
時が流れる
時の流れ
時の果て
時を刻む
Your issue is apparently unique in that case because the native speakers I have asked don't have a problem with any of the above presented suggestions. As might be expected, they are also much more humble about their ability to divine a singularly intended context or appropriate translation from that single phrase.As I mentioned before, 知識の支配者 (or whatever variant we end up with) sounds odd to my ears because there is no context (ある事項について知っていること) for 知識.
出口汪
What does it mean? I saw it in language textbook titles.