This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

My grammar questions

I just want to say thanks to all of you for helping me out so much. Recommending Genki, answering all my questions, and supporting me. I really do appreciate it. :notworthy:
 
ใ“ใ‚“ใซใกใฏใ€‚็š†ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚็งใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ€‚ไปŠๆ—ฅใฏๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใ‚‚ไผ‘ใฟใงใ™ใ€‚

Today I learned how the past affirmative can be the present perfect and past. The way to tell the two apart seems to be certain words and context.

ๅ…ˆ้€ฑใฎๆœจๆ›œๆ—ฅใซ็งๅฎฟ้กŒใ‚’ๅ‹‰ๅผทใ—ใพใ—ใŸใ€‚ I studied my homework last Thursday. This action is done and is not connected to the present.
ใ‚ฑใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใฏ่ปŠใ‚’ใ‚‚ใ†ๆด—ใ„ใพใ—ใŸใ€‚Ken already washed the car. This is connected to the present. I am not sure what the exact implications of this difference are. Could someone please explain a little?

Next is how to form the difference when negative. The ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ form is used for the present progressive form.

็งใฏๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใพใ›ใ‚“ใงใ—ใŸใ€‚I did not eat sushi. This is not connected to the present.
็งใฏๅ…ฌๅœ’ใงๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใฆใ„ใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚I have not eaten sushi in the park yet. Again, this form is connected the present.

Next is how to form relative clauses. You just form a clause and attach it to a noun. The verb must be in the short form.

ๅคงๅญฆใฎๅ‰ใงๆœฌใ‚’่ชญใ‚“ใงใ„ใ‚‹็”ทใฎไบบใฏ็งใฎๅ‹้”ใงใ™ใ€‚The man reading a book in the front of the college is my friend.
ๆ‰‹็ด™ใ‚’ๆ›ธใ„ใฆใ„ใŸๅ…ˆ็”Ÿใฏใ‚นใƒผใƒ‘ใƒผใซ่กŒใใ€‚The teacher writing a letter will go the the supermarket.
็›ฎใŒๅคงใใ„ๅฅณใฏๆ—ฅๆœฌไบบใงใ™ใ€‚The woman with big eyes is Japanese.
My question is can I combine the third sentence's attribute clause with a normal clause?
็œผ้กใ‚’ใ‹ใ‘ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€้ซชใŒ้•ทใ„ๅฅณใฎไบบใฏ่ฒทใ„็‰ฉใซ่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใชใ„ใ€‚The woman wearing glasses, with long hair, has not gone shopping yet..

And the last thing for today is about ใ‹ใ‚‰. It means "because" or, more closely, "therefore." The reason comes first then the result. It can be used with both the long and short form, but it must be the same throughout the whole sentence. If the first part is short then the last must also be. The long form makes ใ‹ใ‚‰ more polite and is used to make requests and suggestions.

ไปŠใฏๅฏ’ใ„ใงใ™ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ไธ€็ท’ใซ่ฑšใ‚ซใƒ„ใ‚’ใŸในใพใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ‹ใ€‚ It is cold, therefore shall we eat tonkatsu?
็งใฏๆ˜Žๆ—ฅ่‹ฑ่ชžใ‚’่ฆ‹ใซ่กŒใใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ๆš‡ใ˜ใ‚ƒใชใ„ใ€‚I am going to see a movie tomorrow, therefore I am not free.

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
ๅ…ˆ้€ฑใฎๆœจๆ›œๆ—ฅใซ็งใฏๅฎฟ้กŒใ‚’ใ—ใพใ—ใŸใ€‚
ๅฎฟ้กŒใ‚’ๅ‹‰ๅผทใ—ใพใ—ใŸ can be understandable, but sounds awkward.

The temporal adverbs are the key. The former sentence is just a description of a past event, but in the latter one, ใ‚‚ใ† suggests that he needs to wash the car by today and already did it, for instance. In these cases, ๆด—ใ„ใพใ—ใŸ is more likely the perfect tense rather than past. And this is exactly the reason why ๏ฝžใฆใ„ใ‚‹ form appears in ็งใฏๅ…ฌๅœ’ใงๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใฆใ„ใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚.

็›ฎใŒๅคงใใ„ๅฅณใฏๆ—ฅๆœฌไบบใงใ™ใ€‚
ๅฅณใฎไบบ is appropriate to avoid sounding rude.
 
ไปŠๆ—ฅใฏๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใ‚‚ไผ‘ใฟใงใ™ใ€‚

ไปŠๆ—ฅใ‚‚ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใ‚‚
Or
ไปŠๆ—ฅใจๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใฏ

็งใฏๆ˜Žๆ—ฅ่‹ฑ่ชžใ‚’่ฆ‹ใซ่กŒใใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ๆš‡ใ˜ใ‚ƒใชใ„ใ€‚I am going to see a movie tomorrow, therefore I am not free.

ๆ˜ ็”ป not ่‹ฑ่ชž

This kind of mistake is incredibly easy to make. Between this kind of error and the kind where we just assume the computer picked the right kanji for us, it is important to get into the habit of double checking.
 
ใฉใ†ใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

It looks like I got the grammar down. I will make sure to double check to avoid using the wrong kanji.
 
ใŠใฏใ‚ˆใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚็š†ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚็งใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ€‚

I learned how to make comparisons. The format is Aใฎใปใ†ใŒ๏ผขใ‚ˆใ‚Šproperty. Apparently in spoken Japanese this order is reversed.

้›ป่ปŠใฎใปใ†ใŒ่ปŠใ‚ˆใ‚Šๆ—ฉใ„ใจๆ€ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚I think trains are faster than cars.
้‡Ž่œใจ่‚‰ใจใฉใฃใกใŒๅฎ‰ใ„ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚Which is cheaper, vegetables or meat?
ไธญๅ›ฝใจใ‚ขใƒกใƒชใ‚ซใจ้Ÿ“ๅ›ฝใฎไธญใงใฉใฃใกใŒไธ€็•ชๅคงใใ„ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚Which is the biggest, China, America, or Korea?
ใ‚ขใƒกใƒชใ‚ซใŒไธ€็•ชๅคงใใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚America is the biggest. I am fairly certain that China is actually bigger.

Next I learned how a noun can be replaced with ใฎ when it is obvious what the speaker is talking about. This appears to only work when the noun is after a adjective or another noun.

็งใฏ้ป’ใ„้ดไธ‹ใ‚’ๆŒใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚็™ฝใ„ใฎใ‚‚ๆŒใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚I have black socks. I also have white ones.
็งใฎ้ž„ใฏๆœบใฎไธ‹ใซใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚ใ„ใ„ใˆใ€ใ‚บใƒใ•ใ‚“ใฎใ€ใ“ใ“ใซใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚My bad is under the desk. No it is here.

I also learned about ใคใ‚‚ใ‚Š to say that you have the intention to do X or not do X.

ๆ—ฅๆœฌใซ่กŒใใคใ‚‚ใ‚Šใงใ—ใŸใ‘ใฉใ€ใŠ้‡‘ใŒใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€่กŒใใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚I intended to go to Japan, but I have not money, therefore I will not go.
ๆฅ้€ฑ็งใฏใ‚ฑใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใจใƒฉใƒผใƒกใƒณๅฑ‹ใซ้ฃŸในใซ่กŒใใคใ‚‚ใ‚Šใ ใ€‚Next week I intend to go and eat at the ramen shop with Ken.

Next is ใชใ‚‹ which attaches to adjectives and nouns and means "To become X" and shows a change.

ๅ…ˆ้€ฑใ‚ญใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏ็ตฆไป•ใซใชใฃใŸใจๆ€ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚I think Kim became a waitress last week.
ใ“ใฎ้ž„ใฏๅ‰ใ‚ˆใ‚Š้‡ใใชใ‚Šใพใ—ใŸใ€‚This bag is heavier than before.
็งใฏๆ•ฐๅญฆใŒๅฅฝใใซใชใ‚Šใพใ—ใŸใ€‚I have grown fond of math. One note is that when ใชใ‚‹ is used with adjectives the change is ambiguous. It can be either absolute or relative. You need to specify. I know you can use the comparision format, like in my second example, to make it relative, but I am not sure how to make it absolute.

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
ไธญๅ›ฝใจใ‚ขใƒกใƒชใ‚ซใจ้Ÿ“ๅ›ฝใฎไธญใงใฉใฃใกใŒไธ€็•ชๅคงใใ„ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚
It should be ใฉใ‚Œ or ใฉใฎๅ›ฝใŒไธ€็•ชๅคงใใ„ใงใ™ใ‹. ใฉใฃใกใŒ is for comparing two things, and can't be used for three or more things.

ใ„ใ„ใˆใ€ใ‚บใƒใ•ใ‚“ใฎใ€ใ“ใ“ใซใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚... No it is here.
Do you mean ใ„ใ„ใˆใ€ใ‚บใƒใ•ใ‚“ใฎใฏใ“ใ“ใซใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚ (No, Zuba's is not here)?

ๆฅ้€ฑ็งใฏใ‚ฑใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใจใƒฉใƒผใƒกใƒณๅฑ‹ใซ้ฃŸในใซ่กŒใใคใ‚‚ใ‚Šใ ใ€‚
ๆฅ้€ฑ็งใฏใ‚ฑใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใจใƒฉใƒผใƒกใƒณๅฑ‹ใซ่กŒใใคใ‚‚ใ‚Šใ ใ€‚
ๆฅ้€ฑ็งใฏใ‚ฑใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใจใƒฉใƒผใƒกใƒณใ‚’้ฃŸในใซ่กŒใใคใ‚‚ใ‚Šใ ใ€‚
ๆฅ้€ฑ็งใฏใ‚ฑใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใจใƒฉใƒผใƒกใƒณๅฑ‹ใซ้คƒๅญใ‚’้ฃŸในใซ่กŒใใคใ‚‚ใ‚Šใ ใ€‚

It's common to go to a ramen shop and eat something (mostly ramen) there, ใƒฉใƒผใƒกใƒณๅฑ‹ใซ้ฃŸในใซ่กŒใ sounds somewhat repetitious. If what you are going to eat is not ramen, you need to mention it.

I know you can use the comparision format, like in my second example, to make it relative, but I am not sure how to make it absolute.
Isn't there any example in the book?
 
ใฉใ†ใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

ใ„ใ„ใˆใ€ใ‚บใƒใ•ใ‚“ใฎใฏใ“ใ“ใซใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚Yes, I meant to put that. Oops.

The use of ใฉใฃใก is something I did not know. Thanks a ton for that piece of info.

There are no examples on how to make a absolute statement using ใชใ‚‹. There was a example on how to use it relatively. Which is how I made my second sentence.

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
What is the exact explanation about that usage in the textbook?
 
ใ“ใ‚“ใฐใ‚“ใฏใ€‚็š†ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚็งใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ€‚

"When a adjective is used with naru, a question arises whether the sentence describes an absolute change or a relative change. naru sentences are ambiguous in isolation. If you want to make clear that you are talking in relative terms, you can use the pattern for comparison with naru." That is from the book.

One thing I forgot to mention in my last post was that I learned how to use ใง to indicate the tool by which you do something.

็งใฏใƒ†ใƒฌใƒ“ใงๆ˜ ็”ปใ‚’่ฆ‹ใพใ™ใ€‚I will watch a movie on the TV.
ใ‚ตใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏ่ปŠใงไผš็คพใซ่กŒใใพใ™ใ€‚Sam goes to the company by car.
้ซชใŒ้•ทใ„็”ทใฎไบบใฏ้‰›็ญ†ใงไฝœๆ–‡ใ‚’ๆ›ธใ„ใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚The man with the long hair is writing the essay with a pencil
็งใฏๆญฉใ„ใฆใ‚นใƒผใƒ‘ใƒผใซๅˆ‡็ฌฆใ‚’่ฒทใ„ใซ่กŒใใพใ™ใ€‚I will go to the super market on food to buy stamps. The ๆญฉใ„ใฆ now makes sense to me. It is basically turning ๆญฉใ into the ใฆ form which is acting like the ใง to mark "by what means."

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
Google returns this site that contains an example.
Japanese Grammar - ะ“ั€ะฐะผะผะฐั‚ะธะบะฐ ะฏะฟะพะฝัะบะธะน - I - 10-04
ใ™ใฃใ‹ใ‚Šๆš–ใ‹ใใชใฃใŸใฎใงใ€ใ‚‚ใ†้›ชใฏ้™ใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€‚
ๅ‰ใ‚ˆใ‚Šๆš–ใ‹ใใชใฃใŸใ‘ใฉใ€ใพใ ่‚Œๅฏ’ใ„ใ€‚
Hmm, I don't think the difference is significant.
 
ใฉใ†ใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

That is good, I will just not worry about it too much then.

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
ใ“ใ‚“ใซใกใฏใ€‚็š†ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚

I learned about ใŸใ„ today. It attaches to the stem form of verbs and is used to say what you want to do. It cannot be used for others. It conjugates like a I-adjective.

็งใฏ้‡Ž่œใ‚’้ฃŸในใŸใใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚I do not want to eat vegetables.
็งใฏๆญฉใ„ใฆๅฎถใ‹ใ‚‰ๅ›ณๆ›ธ้คจใพใง่กŒใฃใŸใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€็–ฒใ‚Œใพใ—ใŸใ€‚ๆฐดใ‚’้ฃฒใฟใŸใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚Because I went from my house to the library on foot I am tired. I want to drink water.

If you want to show that you have had the desire for a long time use ใจๆ€ใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™

็งใฏๆ—ฅๆœฌใซ่กŒใใŸใ„ใจๆ€ใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚I want to go to Japan.

If you want to talk about other you must use ใŸใŒใ‚‹, which attaches to the stem form of the verb.

ใ‚ตใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใŸใ ใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚Sam wants to eat sushi.

One question I have is that it says I can replace the ใ‚’ with a ใŒ when using the ใŸใ„ form. What would be the difference if I did that?

Next is ใŸใ‚Š. This is formed by just adding ใ‚Š to the short past form of a verb. It is used when listing activities and shows that the things listed are just examples and not a exhaustive list. For the last verb you place ใ™ใ‚‹ . This is used to indicate the tense of the sentence.

ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅ็งใฏๆฑไบฌใงใŠ่Œถใ‚’ๆ›ธใ„ใŸใ‚Šใ€ๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใŸใ‚Šใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚Tomorrow I buy tea in Tokyo and eat sushi, among other things.

Can I list more than just two activities with ใŸใ‚Š?

Next is when a verb in the short past form is followed by ใ“ใจใŒใ‚ใ‚‹. This shows that you did X or something happened in a earlier time.

ๅฏฟๅธใ‚’ใ‚้ฃŸในใŸใ“ใจใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ‹ใ€‚ Have you eaten sushi before?
้ฃ›่กŒๆฉŸใซไน—ใฃใŸใ“ใจใŒใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚ I have not been on a airplane before.

And lastly is ใ‚„. Which seems to be used just like ใŸใ‚Š for nouns. It shows a incomplete list of nouns. And the items listed are examples.

็งใฏ่Šฑใ‚„ๆœจใ‚’่ฆ‹ใซ่กŒใใพใ™ใ€‚I will go see flowers and trees, among other things.

Can I list more than two items with ใ‚„?

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
just typos
ใ‚ตใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใŸใ ใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚
ใ‚ตใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใŸใŒใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅ็งใฏๆฑไบฌใงใŠ่Œถใ‚’ๆ›ธใ„ใŸใ‚Š
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅ็งใฏๆฑไบฌใงใŠ่Œถใ‚’่ฒทใฃใŸใ‚Š
ๅฏฟๅธใ‚’ใ‚้ฃŸในใŸใ“ใจใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ‹ใ€‚
ๅฏฟๅธใ‚’้ฃŸในใŸใ“ใจใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ‹ใ€‚(ใ‚ is unnecessary.)
้ฃ›่กŒๆฉŸใซไน—ใฃใŸใ“ใจใŒใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚
้ฃ›่กŒๆฉŸใซไน—ใฃใŸใ“ใจใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚(ใ‚ is necessary.)

One question I have is that it says I can replace the ใ‚’ with a ใŒ when using the ใŸใ„ form. What would be the difference if I did that?
ใŒ sometimes has an emphasized/contrastive nuance; "not any other drinks but water", "not any other foods but vegetables", for instance.

Can I list more than just two activities with ใŸใ‚Š?
Can I list more than two items with ใ‚„?
Yes and yes.
 
I'll answer although I could be wrong. Other members will correct me if I am.
One question I have is that it says I can replace the ใ‚’ with a ใŒ when using the ใŸใ„ form. What would be the difference if I did that?
I don't think there's a big difference but I think using ใŒ emphasizes the object. To me
ๆฐดใŒ้ฃฒใฟใŸใ„ sounds like you want to drink water specifically. While
ๆฐดใ‚’้ฃฒใฟใŸใ„ sounds like you want to drink water but would be open to drinking something else.
But like I said, I could be wrong.

Can I list more than just two activities with ใŸใ‚Š?
Can I list more than two items with ใ‚„?
Yes to both but it sounds somewhat childish way of speaking if you go overboard with it. The only time I've encountered this is in (young) children's books.
 
ใฉใ†ใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

ใŠใฏใ‚ˆใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚็š†ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚็งใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ€‚

Sorry I have not been on for a while. I was sick. :yuck: But I feel much better now!

I read that in a negative sentence you will often find ใฏ where ใ‚’ or ใŒ would be. It says this is done because it is natural to have at least one ใฏ in a negative sentence.

ๆถผๅญใ•ใ‚“ใฏใŠ่Œถใ‚’้ฃฒใฟใพใ™ใ‹ใ€‚ Would you like to drink some tea, Ryouko?
ใ„ใ„ใˆใ€ใŠ่Œถใฏ้ฃฒใฟใŸใใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚No, I do not want to drink tea. Or ็งใฏใŠ่Œถใ‚’้ฃฒใฟใŸใใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚There is a ใฏ in this one so there is no need to replace the ใ‚’.

Next is ใ ใ‘, which follows amounts, it shows that that number of items is just enough, but the amount could have been more.

็งใฏ็ด™ใ‚’ไบŒๆžšใ ใ‘ๆŒใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚I have two sheets of paper.
ใŠ่“ๅญใ‚’ๅ››ๅ€‹ใ ใ‘้ฃŸในใพใ—ใŸใ€‚I ate four pieces of candy.

Next is ใซ which can mark the occasion you do something or the role you want something to fulfill.

็ฅญใ‚Šใซๆตด่กฃ็€ใพใ™ใ€‚I will wear a yukata at the festival.
ๅŒ็ช“ไผšใซ็œผ้กใ‚’ใ‹ใ‘ใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚I will not wear glasses at the reunion.
้‹ๅ‹•ใซไป•ไบ‹ใซๆญฉใ„ใฆ่กŒใใพใ™ใ€‚I go to work on foot for exercise.
็ทด็ฟ’ใซๆ—ฅๆœฌใฎๆญŒใ‚’่žใใพใ™ใ€‚I listen to Japanese songs for practice.

And finally is ใซใฏ when used with places. When you put ใฏ after ใซ it changes the meaning subtly. With the ใฏthe sentence is about the place.

ๅฎถใซใฏ็Šฌใจ็ŒซใŒใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚There are cats and dogs at my house.
ใ‚ใฎๆททใ‚“ใงใ„ใ‚‹ๆ–™็†ๅบ—ใซใฏๅ„ชใ—ใ„็ตฆไป•ใŒใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚At that busy restaurant there are nice servers.

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
ใŠๅคงไบ‹ใซใ€‚

Probably the explanation is for usual sentences. As for answers, it's common not to repeat things already known, i.e., ใ„ใ„ใˆใ€้ฃฒใฟใŸใใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ is the most common, ใŠ่Œถใฏ or ็งใฏ unnecessarily emphasizes the topic, and therefore ใฏ works as a contrastive marker as a result (e.g. "I don't want to drink tea, but need some other drinks", "I don't want to drink tea, but my partner wants to drink it").

็ฅญใ‚Šใซๆตด่กฃ็€ใพใ™ใ€‚I will wear a yukata at the festival.
็ฅญใ‚Šใซๆตด่กฃใ‚’็€ใพใ™ใ€‚

ๅŒ็ช“ไผšใซ็œผ้กใ‚’ใ‹ใ‘ใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚I will not wear glasses at the reunion.
ใซ doesn't work well with ๅŒ็ช“ไผš. It should be ๅŒ็ช“ไผšใซ่กŒใใจใใซ or something like that.

้‹ๅ‹•ใซไป•ไบ‹ใซๆญฉใ„ใฆ่กŒใใพใ™ใ€‚I go to work on foot for exercise.
้‹ๅ‹•ใฎใŸใ‚ใซๆญฉใ„ใฆไป•ไบ‹ใซ่กŒใใพใ™ใ€‚

็ทด็ฟ’ใซๆ—ฅๆœฌใฎๆญŒใ‚’่žใใพใ™ใ€‚I listen to Japanese songs for practice.
ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชžใฎ็ทด็ฟ’ใซๆ—ฅๆœฌใฎๆญŒใ‚’่žใใพใ™ใ€‚

As you can see these examples above, there is a limitation where ใซ works well in that function.
 
ใฉใ†ใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

It seems using ใฏ instead of ใŒ or ใ‚’ has more meaning then I am aware of.

ใซ does not work as simply as I thought. This was just a quick notes sections at the end of my lesson and I am sure they will cover all this in more detail later on.

At least two of the points I covered are correct.

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
ใŠใฏใ‚ˆใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚็š†ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚็งใฏๅ…ƒๆฐ—ใงใ™ใ€‚
Hi, everyone. Sorry I have been gone for a couple of weeks. People left work and things were really crazy for a while.

I learned about ใ‚“ใงใ™ today. It seems that when you answer with just ใงใ™ or the polite form of verbs this is just making a statement, and does not really have much emotion. When you add ใ‚“ใงใ™ it explains and seems to give emotion.

ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใƒ†ใ‚นใƒˆใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ—ใŸใ€‚I had a test yesterday.
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใƒ†ใ‚นใƒˆใŒใ‚ใฃใŸใ‚“ใงใ™ใ€‚I had a test yesterday. From what I gather this one gives more emotion and can be used if someone where to ask you what you did yesterday.

็งใฏใ‚ขใ‚คใƒชใ•ใ‚“ใจๆ˜ ็”ปใ‚’่ฆ‹ใซ่กŒใใพใ™ใ€‚I will go see a movie with Airi.
็งใฏใ‚ขใ‚คใƒชใ•ใ‚“ใจๆ˜ ็”ปใ‚’่ฆ‹ใซ่กŒใใ‚“ใงใ™ใ€‚I will go and see a movie with Airi. Again I think by adding ใ‚“ใงใ™ it seems to add more emotion and nuanced meaning depending on the context.

ใฉใ†ใ—ใฆใใฎ้ญšใ‚’้ฃŸในใชใ‹ใฃใŸใ‚“ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚Why did you not eat that fish?
ใ‚ขใƒฌใƒซใ‚ฎใƒผใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‚“ใงใ™ใ€‚I have allergies to fish.

It says that in written Japanese ใฎใงใ™ is used instead of ใ‚“ใงใ™ and in casual speech ใ‚“ใ  is used.

Next is ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ which attaches to the stem form of verbs and adjectives and means "too much or to excess." I think it has a negative nuance to it.

ใ‚ใฎ่ปŠใฏ้ซ˜ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใ‚“ใงใ™ใ€‚That car is too expensive.
ใ‚ˆใ—ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅฏใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€้…ๅˆปใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚Because Yoshi sleeps too much he is late.

ใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใงใ™ follows verbs and is used when the speaker is giving a specific piece of advice to do or not to do X and if not done a negative result will occur. What is interesting is that to give a affirmative piece of advice ใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ follows the plain past form of the verb.

ไปŠๆ–™็†ๅบ—ใฏใซใŽใ‚„ใ‹ใ˜ใ‚ƒใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ๆŽƒ้™คใ—ใŸใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚ Because the restaurant is not busy not you should clean.
ใ“ใ‚Œใ‚’้ฃŸในใชใ„ใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚ใฉใ†ใ—ใฆใ‚“ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚็พŽๅ‘ณใ—ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใ‚“ใงใ™ใ€‚You should not eat this. Why? It is too delicious.

ใฎใง works just like ใ‹ใ‚‰ to mean "because." It is was only stated that ใฎใง sounds slightly more formal.

ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใฏไผ‘ใฟใชใฎใงใ€ๅฏใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚ Because tomorrow is a holiday I will not sleep.

In the book the reason is always in the short form and the cause or result is always in the long form. Could I make the reason part long form as well?

Now up is ใกใ‚ƒใ„ใ‘ใพใ›ใ‚“ which comes after the short negative form of verbs in the their ใ form. This is used to say something must be done.

ใ‚ตใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅธฐใ‚‰ใชใใกใ‚ƒใ„ใ‘ใพใ›ใ‚“ใญใ€‚You need to go home, right Sam?
ๅฎถใฏๆฑšใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใฎใงใ€ๅฎถไบ‹ใ—ใชใใกใ‚ƒใ„ใ‘ใชใ„ใ‚“ใงใ™ใ€‚Because the house is too dirty, I must clean.

And finally is ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†. This just follows that short form of verbs, nouns, and adjectives and shows a guess.

ใ‚ใฎ็ฎฑๆ€ใ„ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ€‚ That box is probably heavy.
ไปŠๆ—ฅใ‚ฑใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใฏๅ›ณๆ›ธ้คจใซ่กŒใใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ€‚ Ken will probably go to the library today.

Thanks for all the help! ใ‚ˆใ‚ใ—ใใŠ้ก˜ใ„ใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใƒ†ใ‚นใƒˆใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ—ใŸใ€‚I had a test yesterday.

ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใฏไผ‘ใฟใชใฎใงใ€ๅฏใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚ Because tomorrow is a holiday I will not sleep.

That ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅ must be like "aloha" for breadth of meaning....

ใ‚ใฎ็ฎฑๆ€ใ„ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ€‚ That box is probably heavy.

ๆ€ใ„?

You can't trust the computer to choose the correct kanji for you.
 
ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

Thanks for spotting my typos. It is funny how I think I wrote everything fine and then all these silly mistakes start surfacing. :roflmao:

ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
ไปŠๆ–™็†ๅบ—ใฏใซใŽใ‚„ใ‹ใ˜ใ‚ƒใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ๆŽƒ้™คใ—ใŸใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚ Because the restaurant is not busy not you should clean.
ไปŠใ€ๅบ—/ใƒฌใ‚นใƒˆใƒฉใƒณใฏๅฟ™ใ—ใใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ๆŽƒ้™คใ—ใŸใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚

ใฉใ†ใ—ใฆใ‚“ใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚
ใฉใ†ใ—ใฆใงใ™ใ‹ใ€‚

ใฎใง works just like ใ‹ใ‚‰ to mean "because." It is was only stated that ใฎใง sounds slightly more formal.
Here's an explanation about the difference between ใฎใง and ใ‹ใ‚‰.

Need a word or phrase translated? | Page 336 | Japan Forum

Could I make the reason part long form as well?
Yes, ไผ‘ใฟใงใ™ใฎใง and ไผ‘ใฟใงใ™ใ‹ใ‚‰ are both valid. The former sounds rather polite.
 
ใฉใ†ใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚

Thanks so much! The difference with ใ‹ใ‚‰ and ใฎใง now makes sense.

ๆ™ดใ‚Œใงใ™ใฎใงใ€ไธ€็ท’ใซๅ…ฌๅœ’ใซ่กŒใใพใ›ใ‚“ใ‹ใ€‚Since this is a invitation I would not use ใฎใง, correct?
ๆ™ดใ‚Œใงใ™ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ไธ€็ท’ใซๅ…ฌๅœ’ใซ่กŒใใพใ›ใ‚“ใ‹ใ€‚This one is right I think.

One other things is that the short form of ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ† is ใ ใ‚ใ†. Can I use it just like ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†?

ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„ใƒใ‚นใฏๅบƒใ„ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ€‚The new bus is spacious.
ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„ใƒใ‚นใฏๅบƒใ„ใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€‚

And one last thing is that the book told me that in casual exchanges ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ† is shortened to ใงใ—ใ‚‡ and used with a rising intonation and is used to confirm with your partner what you said is correct.

ใ‚ตใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๆ–™็†ใ™ใ‚‹ใฎใŒไธŠๆ‰‹ใงใ—ใ‚‡๏ผŸYou are good at cooking, right Sam?

It seems that this short ใงใ—ใ‚‡ act a lot like ใญ. Do I have the correct understanding of this?

ใ‚ˆใ‚ใ—ใใŠ้ก˜ใ„ใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚ใ˜ใ‚ƒใ€ใพใŸใ€‚
 
Yes for ใฎใง vs. ใ‹ใ‚‰ and ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ† vs. ใ ใ‚ใ†.

The nuance of ใงใ—ใ‚‡ is closer to ใ‚ˆใญ than ใ‚ˆ.
e.g.
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใฏๆ™ดใ‚Œใงใ—ใ‚‡๏ผŸ
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใฏๆ™ดใ‚Œใ ใ‚๏ผŸ
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใฏๆ™ดใ‚Œใ‚ˆใญ๏ผŸ
ๆ˜Žๆ—ฅใฏๆ™ดใ‚Œใ ใ‚ˆใญ๏ผŸ
("Noun/Na-adjective + ใ‚ˆใญ" sounds feminine. Male usually uses ใ ใ‚ˆใญ. ใงใ—ใ‚‡ could sound feminine as well, unlike ใ ใ‚.)

This ใงใ—ใ‚‡ often has a nuance of complaint.
e.g.
ใ‚ตใƒ ใ•ใ‚“ใฏๆ–™็†ใ™ใ‚‹ใฎใŒไธŠๆ‰‹ใงใ—ใ‚‡๏ผŸ๏ผˆใชใฎใซใชใ‚“ใงๆ–™็†ใ—ใชใ„ใฎ๏ผŸ)
You are good at cooking, right Sam? (so why don't you cook?)

Note that sentence final particles are a very very complicated, hard-to-grasp issue for non-native speakers, even for advanced or fluent learners. It's the hardest one, I believe.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn moreโ€ฆ