This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Tourism Mount Fuji facing hordes of hikers - and a tourism cap

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,057
Reaction score
18,914
Poor Mount Fuji. Japan's most iconic World Heritage site struggles with crowds, the threat of eruptions--and a planned railway line.






Communities around Mount Fuji call for a cap on the number of hikers and other safety measures ahead of an expected post-COVID-19 boom in visitors to Japan's tallest mountain this summer.




Another concern is disaster prevention, as Mt. Fuji is an active volcano. A challenge that has taken on a greater urgency than before the World Heritage listing is disaster prevention at Mount Fuji, an active volcano. The 2014 eruption of Mount Ontake, straddling Nagano and Gifu prefectures, illustrated the risk of a volcanic eruption. The sudden eruption left 58 climbers dead and five missing.







And as if all this wasn't enough, the Yamanashi Prefectural government contemplates constructing a railway from Mt. Fuji's foot to the fifth station on the existing Fuji Subaru Line toll road.





 
I saw Mt. Fuji during the winter going to Yokota Air Base in the early morning riding the train. ( was living in Ikuta ) The image of this mountain still remains with me. Although I never thought of climbing it, I wonder if I would now with my travels of Japan.
 
I climbed Mt. Fuji about 20 years ago. We took a bus to possibly the 5th station and started our ascent from there. We started in the evening, slept shortly at one of the lodges, where you basically paid to sleep sandwiched between two other people on the floor. Woke up very early and finished the climb in time to see the sun rise from the summit. It was one of the most amazing experiences of my life.

People asked me if it was hard climbing that high where the oxygen was thinner. I responded that I have asthma. Thin air is my daily life. LOL

Regarding the train, I don't support its construction, but I don't oppose it either. If there had been a train at the time connecting with the shinkansen, we probably would have used it instead of the bus.
 
I guess I'd support the construction of a train.

And a train might solve the supposed hypoxia effect (or whatever it was) of someone driving away and crashing/killing someone with their car.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…