Japanese man murders hostess

Emoni · 16 Dec 2008

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2008121...rimeconvict;_ylt=AvJflRzgj_EIIAt14qTwYrBvaA8F

TOKYO (AFP) – A Japanese court on Tuesday convicted a Tokyo businessman of abducting British bar hostess Lucie Blackman and mutilating her body but not of killing her, partly reversing an earlier acquittal.

There is no change to the sentence on former property developer Joji Obara, 56, who was jailed for life last year for raping nine other women, including causing the death of one of them.

Blackman disappeared in Tokyo in 2000 while she worked as a bar hostess in Tokyo. Her dismembered body was found seven months later.

The Tokyo High Court ruled Obara kidnapped her and abandoned and mutilated her body, but said it could not prove he killed the 21-year-old.

"The court dismisses the first ruling," said judge Hiroshi Kadono, who then handed out a life sentence for crimes including the abduction of Blackman.

"The court recognises that the defendant is responsible for damaging and abandoning the body," the judge added.

A lower court last year convicted Obara of the rape of nine other women and the death of one of them, Australian Carita Ridgway.

But the lower court had cleared Obara on all counts related to Blackman due to a lack of evidence. He was accused of rape leading to her death but not of first-degree murder, which carries the death penalty.

Obara, who preyed on women in Tokyo's seedy Roppongi area, was accused of drugging his victims with chloroform, a colourless drug used as an anaesthetic in the 19th century.

Am I reading this correctly? Yeah, he kidnapped her, raped her, chopped her up, oh but he didn't actually KILL her... so he didn't get a murder count. I'm hesitant on anything regarding a death penalty (but not necessarily against it), but this is just one of those insane rulings that I don't understand how could possibly be seen as respectable.

Does anyone else have any details as to how this ruling went down and is being justified? A little voice in my mind is just screaming that there might be aspects of racism here, but I don't necessarily see and direct proof other than a laughably sick ruling.

becki_kanou · 16 Dec 2008

I don't know for sure, but I seem to remember that he was a rich guy with a lot of influence who got a good lawyer and played the system for all it was worth and that's why he got off lightly. I might be misremembering though, so maybe someone else knows the details.

FrustratedDave · 16 Dec 2008

I think it was that they could not prove that it was him who actually killed her, but it was him dispossed of the body. Sad case indeed, I feel for her and her parents.

Astroboy · 16 Dec 2008

Emoni said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2008121...rimeconvict;_ylt=AvJflRzgj_EIIAt14qTwYrBvaA8F
Am I reading this correctly? Yeah, he kidnapped her, raped her, chopped her up, ....

Joji Obara - Yes, he is a Japanese, changed from Korean nationality.

Joji Obara was born Kim Sung Jong to a Korean family in Osaka in 1952. During his youth, his father worked his way from scrap collector to taxi driver to immensely wealthy owner of a string of pachinko parlours.[1] At 15, Obara enrolled in one of Japan's most elite high schools, a prep school affiliated with Keio University. Two years later, upon his father's death, he inherited holdings in Osaka and Tokyo. After graduating from Keio University with degrees in politics and law, he became a naturalized Japanese citizen and legally changed his name to Joji Obara.
Joji Obara - Wikipedia

JerseyBoy · 16 Dec 2008

Emoni said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2008121...rimeconvict;_ylt=AvJflRzgj_EIIAt14qTwYrBvaA8F
Am I reading this correctly? Yeah, he kidnapped her, raped her, chopped her up, oh but he didn't actually KILL her... so he didn't get a murder count. I'm hesitant on anything regarding a death penalty (but not necessarily against it), but this is just one of those insane rulings that I don't understand how could possibly be seen as respectable.
Does anyone else have any details as to how this ruling went down and is being justified? A little voice in my mind is just screaming that there might be aspects of racism here, but I don't necessarily see and direct proof other than a laughably sick ruling.

I don't think Japan has the jury system like USA and other Western countries. If regular common sense people hear the case in the jury trial, that piece of shXt will get a murder conviction (and hopefully with the chair or public hanging).
(I read some articles by Japan Times that Japan may be implementing the jury trials in the future. They are saying something about making the regular folks a judge or something. what! I think they messed up the translation).

Emoni · 17 Dec 2008

A quick glance at the wiki you posted, if accurate, makes this case even more awful and pathetic...

Someone4373 · 1 Jan 2009

Japanese court system is quite ineffective in some ways. Quite a shame...

Japanese man murders hostess

Emoni

先輩

becki_kanou

Sumo Freak

FrustratedDave

先輩

Astroboy

先輩

JerseyBoy

Back in town

Emoni

先輩

Someone4373

後輩

Similar threads